Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:39:27.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucracy, Friends, and Money: The Growth of Capital Socialism in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Frank N. Pieke
Frank N. Pieke
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since 1978, the Chinese economic reforms that Deng Xiaoping initiated have given more room to market forces, legalized private entrepreneurship, and decentralized considerable decision-making power into the hands of the directors of state-owned enterprises through responsibility or contract systems. These reforms have produced some spectacular successes. Currently, the Chinese are richer, better informed, and have more personal freedom than at any other time since the Communist victory in 1949. Yet, despite these results, there seems to be no clear-cut plan of reform. At the national level, the policies of reform are the object of constant debate and infighting between shifting coalitions of Party and state leaders. As a result, the reforms are often inconsistent and display a continually changing pattern of radicalization and retrenchment through an array of policy initiatives, experiments, and new legislation.

Type
Communist Business
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 1995 , pp. 494 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Lomnitz L. 1988. “Informal Exchange Networks in Formal Systems: A Theoretical Model.” American Anthropologist, 90:1. 42–55.Google Scholar
Bertaux, D. 1980. “L'approche biographique: sa validite méthodologique, ses potentialités.” Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, no. 69:197 225.Google Scholar
Bloch, M; and Parry, J.. 1989. ‘Introduction: Money and the Morality of Exchange,’ in Money and the Morality of Exchange, Bloch, M. and Parry, J., eds., 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Anita. 1992. “Dispelling Misconceptions about the Red Guard Movement.” The Journal of Contemporary China, 1:1. 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, K. 1989. “Revival of Religious Practices in Fujian: A Case Study,” in The Turning of the Tide: Religion in China Today, Pas, J. F., ed., 51–77. Hong Kong: Royal Asiatic Society and Oxford University Press, Hong Kong Branch.Google Scholar
Deng, G. A. 1989. “Getihude wenhua xintai (Cultural Attitudes of Individual Entre preneurs).” Shehui, 2:49. 28–30.Google Scholar
Fried, M. 1956. Fabric of Chinese Society: A Study of the Social Life of a Chinese County Seat. London: Atlantic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essay on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York,: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review, 48:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, 91:3. 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H. C. 1944. “The Chinese Concept of ‘Face.’” American Anthropologist, 46:1. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K. K. 1987. “Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game.” American Journal of Sociology, 92:4, 944–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
karmel, Solomon M. 1995. “Emerging Securities Markets in China: Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics.” China Quarterly, no. 140:1105 20.Google Scholar
King, A.Y.C. 1991. “Kuan-hsi and Network Building: A Sociological Interpretation,” in “The Living Tree: The Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today.” Daedalus, 120:2. 63–84.Google Scholar
Kornai, J. 1980. The Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.Google Scholar
Mars, G.; and Altman, Y.. 1983. “The Cultural Bases of Soviet Georgia's Second Economy.” Soviet Studies, 35:4, 546–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton, B. 1992. “Implications of the State Monopoly over Industry and Its Relaxation.” Modern China, 18:1. 14–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, V. 1989. “A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.” American Sociological Review, 54:5, 663–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for the Survey of Public Opinion, Research Institute for China's Economic Reconstruction. 1989. “The Social Psychological Environment for the 1987 Reform.” Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 22:2. 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1989. State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oi, J. C. 1990. “The Fate of the Collective after the Commune,” in Chinese Society on the Eve of Tiananmen: The Impact of Reform, Davis, Deborah and Vogel, Ezra, eds., 15–36. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, S. Q.; and Qiu, L. P.. 1989. “Preliminary Study of the Social Structure of Social Classes and Strata in China.” Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 22:2. 5–20.Google Scholar
Pieke, F. N. 1996. The Ordinary and the Extraordinary: An Anthropological Study of Chinese Reform and the 1989 People's Movement in Beijing. London: Kegan Paul. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Rofel, L. 1989. “Hegemony and Productivity: Workers in Post-Mao China,” in Marxism and the Chinese Experience: Issues in Contemporary Chinese Socialism, Dirlik, A. and Meisner, M., eds., 235–52. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Rofel, L. 1992. “Rethinking Modernity: Space and Factory Discipline in China.” Cultural Anthropology, 7:1, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. 1990. “The Rise (and Fall) of Public Opinion in Post-Mao China,” in Reform and Reaction in Post-Mao China: The Road through Tiananmen, Baum, Richard, ed., 60–83. New York,: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sachs, J.; and Woo, W. T.. 1994. “Structural Factors in the Economic Reforms of China, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union.” Economic Policy, no. 18:101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. D. 1965. “On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange,” in The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology, Banton, M., ed., 139–236. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Siu, H. 1989. “Recycling Rituals: Politics and Popular Culture in Contemporary Rural China,” in Unofficial China: Popular Culture and Thought in the People's Republic, Link, P., Madsen, R., and Pickowicz, P. G., eds., 121–37. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Walder, A. G. 1986. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walder, A. G. 1989. “Factory and Manager in an Era of Reform.” China Quarterly, no. 118:249 53.Google Scholar
Wank, D. L. 1990. “Private Commerce as a Vocation: Social Mobility and the Wholesale Trade in Urban China.” China News Analysis, no. 1424.Google Scholar
White, G. 1993. Riding the Tiger: The Politics of Economic Reform in Post-Mao China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C.P.W. 1992. “Fiscal Reform and Local Industrialization: The Problematic Sequencing of Reform in Post-Mao China.” Modern China 18:2. 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. S. 1957. “The Concept of Pao as a basis for Social Relations in China,” in Chinese Thought and Institutions, Fairbank, John K., ed., 291–309. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yang, M.M.H. 1989. “The Gift Economy and State Power in China.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31:1. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar