No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
The Chinese scholar-official had long constituted a special type of iron-clad intelligentsia, firmly based on the Confucian tradition and accustomed to rule China with unchallenged authority. This tradition was threatened for the first time in 1838 with the outbreak of the “Opium” or First Anglo-Chinese War. Outwardly, this was a simple military defeat by a “barbarian” force on one frontier of China, remote from the capital and court at Peking. As such it was nothing new in Chinese history. Hsiung-nu, Toba Tartars, Mongols and Manchus had threatened and overrun Chinese borders through the centuries. To most articulate Chinese both this and successive assaults on China through the nineteenth century, were adequately explained by the traditional and reassuring formula.
1 Lien-che, Tu translates this “Lin, clear as the Heavens,” Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period, Arthur Hummel, W., ed. (Washington, 1943), p. 511.Google Scholar
2 Translations in Chinese Repository, v. 8 (1839–1840), pp. 9–12, 497–503.Google Scholar
3 Chinese Repository, v. 8 (1839–1840), p. 76.Google Scholar
4 Ibid, p. 77.
5 Ibid, p. 419.
6 Reviewed as “Statistical Notices of the Ocean Kingdom with Maps,” 50 ch., Chinese Repository, v. 16 (1847), pp. 417–424.Google Scholar
7 Swisher, , Earl, , China's Management of the American Barbarians (New Haven, 1951), pp. 510–511.Google Scholar
8 Ibid., p. 98.
9 Chen, Gideon, Lin Tse-hsu: Pioneer Promotor of the Adoption of Western Means of Maritime Defense in China (Peiping, 1934).Google Scholar
10 Ssu-yu, Teng, et. ah, China's Response to the West, p. 55Google Scholar; quoting Hai Km T'u Chih, of which the chapters on military affairs certainly reflect Lin's ideas and were probably written by him.
11 Ibid., p. 56.
12 Machair, H. F, Modern Chinese History, Selected Readings (Shanghai, 1923), p. 5.Google Scholar
13 Memorial of P'an Tsu-Yin, 05 28, 1858, in Swisher, op. cit., p. 680.Google Scholar
14 Hail, W. J., Tseng Kuo-fan and the Taiping Rebellion (New Haven, 1927), pp. 260–61.Google Scholar
15 Teng Ssu-yu, op. cit., p. 137.
16 Hail, op. cit., p. 333.
17 Teng Ssu-yu, op. cit., p. 126.
18 Quoted by Hail, , op. cit., p. 325, from Kawasaki, , To-ho no I-jin (Tokyo, 1890).Google Scholar
19 Chih-tung, Chang, China's Only Hope, translated by Woodbridge, Samuel I. (New York, 1900).Google Scholar
20 Macnair, op. cit., p. 575.
21 Teng, op. cit., p. 443.
22 Ibid., p. 449–450.
23 Ibid., p. 391.
24 Swisher, op. cit., p. 30.
25 Teng, op. cit., p. 414.
26 Teng, op. dt., p. 35.
27 Ibid., p. 37.
28 Hail, op. tit., p. 147.
29 Ibid., p. 347.
30 Teng, op. cit., p. 162.
31 Ch'en Tseng Kuo-fan, op. cit., p. 74.
32 Hummel, op. cit., p. XXVIII.
33 Teng, op. cit., p. 263.
34 Chih-tung, Chang, China's Only Hope, op. at., p. 75.Google Scholar
35 Teng, op. cit., p. 433.
36 Ibid., p. 489.
37 Cameron, , Meribeth, , Reform Movement in China, 1898–1912, (Stanford University Publications, History, Economics, and Political Science, v. 3, 1931), p. 27.Google Scholar
38 Teng, op. tit., p. 223–234.
39 Wieger, L., A History of the Religious Beliefs and Philosophical Opinions on China, translated by Werner, E. T. C. (Hsien Hsien, 1927), p. 241.Google Scholar