Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:25:17.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closed Corporate and Open Peasant Communities: Reopening a Hastily Shut Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

A. Terry Rambo
A. Terry Rambo
Affiliation:
University of Malaya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a provocatively entitled article, “Chinese Peasants and the Closed Community: An Open and Shut Case,” Professor G. William Skinner has raised a number of important issues regarding the closed corporate and open peasant community types first formulated by Eric Wolf (1955, 1957). Skinner questions Wolfs assumption (1957: 8) that closed corporate communities developed in areas where society became dualized “…into a dominant entrepreneurial sector and a dominated sector of native peasants,” whereas open peasant communities arose in the new, market-production oriented settlements budded off from Europe “ …in response to the rising demand for cash crops which accompanied the development of capitalism in Europe” (Wolf, 1955: 462).

Type
The Accommodation to Capitalism in Peasant Societies
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bernard, R. (1954) “L'évolution des sociétés du Delta Tonkinois sous l'influence de la guerre.” L'Afrique et l'Asie 27 (3): 42–48.Google Scholar
Estermann, Philip I. (1968) Revolutionary Warfare in Rural Vietnam. McLean, Va.: Human Sciences Research (Ms.).Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian C. (1968) “The significance of quasi-groups in the study of complex societies.” In Banton, Michael (ed.), The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. London: Tavistock Publications: 97–122.Google Scholar
Osborne, Milton E. (1965) Strategic Hamlets in South Viet-Nam, a Survey and Comparison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program Data Paper no. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toan, Pham Quang (1971) “Vai tró làng xā chien dãu trong chieh tranh nhân dân o miên nam.” Nghiên Cùu Lich , no. 136, Jan-Feb: 21–34.Google Scholar
Rambo, A. Terry (1973) A Comparison of Peasant Social Systems of Northern and Southern Viet-Nam. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Center for Viet-namese Studies.Google Scholar
Rambo, A. Terry and Jamieson, Neil L. III (1973) Cultural Change in Rural Viet-Nam. New York: Asia Society. SEADAG papers on Asia.Google Scholar
Skinner, G. William (1964) “Marketing and social structure in rural China.” Journal of Asian Studies, 23: 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, G. William (1971) “Chinese Peasants and the Closed Community: An Open and Shut Case.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 13 (3): 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl (1957) Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. (1955) “Types of Latin American Peasantry: a preliminary discussion.” American Anthropologist 57: 452–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. (1956) “San Jose: Subcultures of a traditional coffee municipality,” in Steward, Julian (ed.) The Peoples of Puerto Rico. Urbana, Ill: University of Illinois Press: 171–264.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. (1957) “Closed corporate peasant communities in Mesoamerica and Central Java.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 13: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. (1966) Peasants. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. and Edward, Hansen (1972) The Human Condition in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar