Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:34:50.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colonial Population and the Idea of Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Samantha Iyer
Samantha Iyer*
Affiliation:
History, University of California, Berkeley
*
sgiyer1@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article traces the shift in demographic thought from the Malthusian framework that predominated in English-language political economic writings of the nineteenth century to demographic transition theory, which prevailed by the mid-twentieth century. An analysis of demographic theory offers particular insights onto the intellectual history of development because the question of population served as the point of departure for various development theories. While the scholarly literature on U.S. development ideas and projects has grown increasingly rich and sophisticated in recent decades, it remains wedded to the notion that there was a stark rupture between American development theory and the conditions in and relationships to the underdeveloped world that it sought to describe. This belief threatens to trivialize the significance of violent economic, environmental, and political circumstances that made development a useful lens of interpretation. Focusing especially on ideas about India, this article examines how, in an era of economic crises, intellectual and political exchange between British colonial, Indian nationalist, and American thinkers concerning the problems of disease, famine, and immigration enabled a transformation in demographic thinking. The concept of development did not simply diffuse from the West to the Rest. Global conflict and dialogue—both between and within empires—enabled its emergence such that, by the early 1950s, peoples in various parts of the world had already taken the ideal of development for granted.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 65 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This follows the periodization in Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 502–21Google Scholar.

2 Szreter, Simon, “The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility Change: A Critical Intellectual History,” Population and Development Review 19, 4 (1993): 662–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Notestein, Frank, “Population: The Long View,” in Schultz, Theodore, ed., Food for the World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945)Google Scholar.

3 Giles Mohan and Kristian Stokke have pointed out the similarities between post-Marxist and neoliberal critiques of development in “Participatory Development and Empowerment: The Dangers of Localism,” Third World Quarterly 21, 2 (2000): 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Escobar, Arturo, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 4Google Scholar. Also within the post-development frame, see Sachs, Wolfgang, ed. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Zed Books, 1992)Google Scholar; Rist, Gilbert, The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith, new ed. (New York: Zed Books, 2002)Google Scholar. Much more sophisticated are Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), ch. 7Google Scholar.

5 Ekbladh, David, The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Westad, Odd Arne, The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gilman, Mandarins of the Future; Latham, Michael E., Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Alexander, Jeffrey C., Fin De Siècle Social Theory: Relativism, Reduction, and the Problem of Reason (New York: Verso, 1995)Google Scholar; Gendzier, Irene L., Managing Political Change: Social Scientists and the Third World (Boulder: Westview Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Adas, Michael, Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Packenham, Robert A., Liberal America and the Third World; Political Development Ideas in Foreign Aid and Social Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

6 Gupta, Akhil, Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Li, Tania, The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cullather, Nick, The Hungry World: America's Cold War Battle against Poverty in Asia (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010)Google Scholar. See also articles by Mohoney, Michael, Engerman, David, Koschmann, Victor, and Brazinsky, Gregg, in Engerman, David C. et al. , eds., Staging Growth: Modernization, Development, and the Global Cold War (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2003)Google Scholar; articles by Stacy Pigg and Mamadou Diof in Cooper, Frederick and Packard, Randall M., eds., International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar; and see the June 2009 issue of Diplomatic History.

7 Fernando Coronil strongly makes this point in “Beyond Occidentalism: Toward Nonimperial Geohistorical Categories,” Cultural Anthropology 11, 1 (1996): 51–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 A clear exception to this criticism is Engerman, David C., Modernization from the other Shore: American Intellectuals and the Romance of Russian Development (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar. In the literature on British colonial development, see Cooper, Frederick, “Modernizing Bureaucrats, Backward Africans, and the Development Concept,” in Cooper, Frederick and Packard, Randall M., eds., International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

9 For example, Arrighi, Giovanni, Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Verso, 2007), ch. 1Google Scholar; Davis, Mike, Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World (New York: Verso, 2001)Google Scholar; Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

10 I explore the history of ideas about mortality patterns, where colonialism reputedly made its mark, but critical intellectual histories of demographic transition theory have thus far tended to focus on the question of fertility decline. See Greenhalgh, Susan, “The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38, 1 (1996): 26–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Szreter, “Idea of Demographic Transition”; Hodgson, Dennis, “Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography,” Population and Development Review 14, 4 (1988): 541–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “Demography as Social Science and Policy Science,” Population and Development Review 9, 1 (1983): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharpless, John, “Population Science, Private Foundations, and Development Aid,” in Cooper, Frederick and Packard, Randall M., eds., International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Thornton, Arland, Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Demeny, Paul, “Social Science and Population Policy,” Population and Development Review 14, 3 (1988): 451–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an analysis of the trends in the scholarship on population see Bashford, Alison, “Nation, Empire, Globe: The Spaces of Population Debate in the Interwar Years,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 49, 1 (2007): 170–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Notestein, “Population”; Davis, Kingsley, “The World Demographic Transition,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 237 (1945): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Klein, Ira, “Death in India, 1871–1921,” Journal of Asian Studies 32, 4 (1973): 639–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Visaria, Leela and Visaria, Pravin, “Population,” in Kumar, Dharma, ed., The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2: 1757–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

14 Crook, Nigel, “On the Comparative Historical Perspective: India, Europe, the Far East,” in Dyson, Tim, ed., India's Historical Demography: Studies in Famine, Disease and Society (London: Curzon Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

15 I am drawing here on the insights of Michael Cowen and Robert Shenton as well as Gillian Hart (who takes inspiration from Karl Polanyi). They have suggested that development ideas and institutions have emerged in various moments to protect society from the chaos of policies rooted in the liberal ideal of the self-regulating market. Cowen, Michael and Shenton, Robert, “The Invention of Development,” in Crush, Jonathan, ed., Power of Development (New York: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar; Hart, Gillian, “Development Critiques in the 1990s: Culs De Sac and Promising Paths,” Progress in Human Geography 25, 4 (2001): 649–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Cadwell, John C., “Malthus and the Less Developed World: The Pivotal Role of India,” Population and Development Review 24, 4 (Dec. 1998): 675–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 682; Caldwell, John C. and Caldwell, Pat, Limiting Population Growth and the Ford Foundation Contribution (Dover, N.H.: F. Pinter, 1986), 37–42Google Scholar.

17 Bewell, Alan, Romanticism and Colonial Disease (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 242–76Google Scholar.

18 Ibid.

19 Arnold, David, The Problem of Nature: Environment, Culture and European Expansion (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), ch. 7Google Scholar; and, ed. Warm Climates and Western Medicine: The Emergence of Tropical Medicine, 1500–1900 (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996), 1–19Google Scholar. On India in particular, see Arnold's, Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993), 28–43Google Scholar; and Harrison, Mark, Public Health in British India: Anglo-Indian Preventive Medicine 1859–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 36–37Google Scholar.

20 Harrison, Mark, Climates & Constitutions: Health, Race, Environment and British Imperialism in India, 1600–1850 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999), ch. 4Google Scholar; Arnold, Colonizing the Body, 72–80.

21 Arnold, Colonizing the Body, 64.

22 Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the Sanitary State of the Army in India [hereafter Royal Sanitary Commission Report], Parliamentary Papers (Hereafter PP), vol. 1, 1863 (Cmd. 3184), lxxxii. See also Florence Nightingale, “How People May Live and not Die in India,” read by Dr. Scoresby Jackson at the Edinburgh meeting of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, Oct. 1863, in Vallée, Gérard and McDonald, Lynn, eds., Florence Nightingale on Health in India, (Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

23 Royal Sanitary Commission Report, xxxvi–xxxcii, xxic, lxxx. Also see discussion in Arnold, Colonizing the Body, 67–72.

24 Quoted in Parkes, Edmund Alexander, A Manual of Practical Hygiene Prepared Especially for Use in the Medical Service of the Army (London: Jon Churchill & Sons, 1864), 561Google Scholar.

25 Ibid.

26 Arnold, Colonizing the Body, ch. 5; Kumar, Anil, Medicine and the Raj: British Medical Policy in India, 1835–1911 (New Delhi: Sage, 1998), 190–203Google Scholar.

27 Caldwell, “Malthus and the Less Developed World,” 682.

28 Royal Sanitary Commission Report, xxxvii–xlii and lxxix.

29 Harrison, Public Health in British India, 9.

30 Plowden, W. Chichele, Report on the Census of British India Taken on the 17th February 1881 (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1883), 143–44Google Scholar; Marten, J. T., Report on the Census of India, 1921 (Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India, 1923), 14–15Google Scholar; Hutton, J. H., Report on the Census of India, 1931 (Delhi: Manager of Publications, 1933), 91–92Google Scholar; Davis, Kingsley, The Population of India and Pakistan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1951), chs. 6, 7, and 9Google Scholar.

31 Salisbury to Governor General of India in Council, 19 July 1777, British Library, London, India Office Records [hereafter IOR], L/E/3/644/103.

32 For example, Report on Sanitary Measures in India [hereafter RSMI] in 1874–75; Together with Miscellaneous Information up to June 1876, vol. VIII, PP, 1876 (C.1615), 143; RSMI in 1878–79: Together with Miscellaneous Information up to June 1880, vol. XII, PP, 1880 (C.2737), 181–82; RSMI in 1889–90, vol. XXIII, PP, 1890–91 (C.6501), 158.

33 Curtin, Philip D., Death by Migration: Europe's Encounter with the Tropical World in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), xviiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 RSMI in 1877–78: Together with Miscellaneous Information up to June 1879, vol. XI, PP, 1878–79 (C.2415), 189; RSMI in 1878–79, 209–10.

35 RSMI in 1877–78, 135; see also RSMI in 1878–79, 210. Incidentally, this argument had little to do with the acceptance of germ theory. Nightingale, like Edwin Chadwick who spearheaded sanitary reform in England, strongly resisted the claims of germ theory. The ASC repeatedly stated in its reports that, whether or not it was correct, the theory held little practical value. Policies based on it, like quarantines, were impossible to enforce. Vallée, Gérard and McDonald, Lynn, eds., Florence Nightingale on Health in India (Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 2006), 863–65Google Scholar. Report on Sanitary Measures in India, in 1874–75, 149; Report on Sanitary Measures in India in 1889–90, 151, 178; Report on Sanitary Measures in India in 1890–91, vol. XXIV, PP, 1892 (C.6735), 176.

36 RSMI in 1877–78, 190; RSMI in 1879–80; Together with Miscellaneous Information up to June 1881, vol. XIII, PP, 1881 (C.2981), 245.

37 RSMI in 1879–80, 195; RSMI in 1878–79, 169.

38 Cross to the Governor General of India in Council, 10 Jan. 1889, 10, IOR, L/E/3/659/2.

39 “Minute by Colonel Henry Yule,” 10 Dec. 1888, 10, IOR, L/E/3/659/2.

40 RSMI in 1877–78, 144, see also 149.

41 RSMI in 1874–75, 150–51, 163–64; RSMI in 1877–78, 135, 150, 154; RSMI in 1878–79, 130–31, 138; RSMI in 1879–80, 169, 172, 203; RSMI in 1889–90, 168, 169, 170, 172; “Minute by Colonel Henry Yule,” 10 Dec. 1888, IOR, L/E/3/659/2; Cross to Governor General of India in Council, 22 Aug. 1889, IOR, L/E/3/659/59.

42 RSMI in 1878–79, 119.

43 This large literature includes Ramanna, Mridula, Western Medicine and Public Health in Colonial Bombay, 1845–1895 (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2002)Google Scholar; Ray, Kabita, History of Public Health: Colonial Bengal, 1921–1947 (Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi & Co., 1998)Google Scholar; Kumar, Medicine and the Raj; Harrison, Public Health in British India; Arnold, Colonizing the Body; Ramasubban, Radhika, “Imperial Health in India, 1857–1900,” in Roy M. MacLeod and Milton James Lewis, eds., Disease, Medicine, and Empire: Perspectives on Western Medicine and the Experience of European Expansion (London: Routledge, 1988)Google Scholar; Jeffery, Roger, The Politics of Health in India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)Google Scholar. For a critique of this literature, highlighting the fractured and changing character of colonial public health policy, see Bhattacharya, Sanjoy, Harrison, Mark, and Worboys, Michael, Fractured States: Smallpox, Public Health and Vaccination Policy in British India 1800–1947 (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2005)Google Scholar.

44 On mortality rates in this period, see Klein, “Death in India.”

45 Davis, The Population of India and Pakistan, 35–36. P. N. Mari Bhat has argued that mortality rates were lower than demographers like Davis have suggested (though still very high) because of misstatements of age in the original statistical returns: “Mortality and Fertility in India, 1881–1961: A Reassessment,” in Dyson, Tim, ed., India's Historical Demography: Studies in Famine, Disease and Society (London: Curzon Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

46 Cross to Governor General of India in Council, 28 Feb. 1889 and India Office, “Memorandum on some of the Results of Indian Administration during the Past Thirty Years of British Rule in India,” Feb. 1889, pp. 17, IOR, L/E/3/659/16.

47 Baines, J. A., General Report on the Census of India, 1891 (London: Printed for the Indian Government by Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1893), 58–59, 64Google Scholar.

48 For example Marten, J. T., Report on the Census of India, 1921 (Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India, 1923), 48Google Scholar.

49 Penrose, E. F., Population Theories and Their Application, with Special Reference to Japan (Stanford: Food Research Institute, 1934), 3–4Google Scholar.

50 There is a huge literature on the phenomenon of fertility decline. Particularly useful works include: Szreter, Simon, Fertility, Class, and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coale, Ansley J. and Watkins, Susan Cotts, eds., The Decline of Fertility in Europe: The Revised Proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986)Google Scholar. For a summary of debates on fertility decline, see Thornton, Reading History Sideways.

51 Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts; Arnold, David, Famine: Social Crisis and Historical Change (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988), ch. 6Google Scholar.

52 Ambirajan, S., “Malthusian Population Theory and Indian Famine Policy in the Nineteenth Century,” Population Studies 30, 1 (1976): 5–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts; Klein, Ira, “When the Rains Failed: Famine, Relief, and Mortality in British India,” Indian Economic & Social History Review 21, 2 (1984): 185–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Hall-Matthews, David, “Colonial Ideologies of the Market and Famine Policy in Ahmednagar District, Bombay Presidency, c. 1870–1884,” Indian Economic & Social History Review 36, 3 (1999): 303–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. For a different interpretation of the famines, which argues that British administration reduced death during famines caused by climatic events, see McAlpin, Michelle Burge, Subject to Famine: Food Crises and Economic Change in Western India, 1860–1920 (Princeton and Guildford: Princeton University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Silver, Beverly J. and Arrighi, Giovanni, “Polanyi's ‘Double Movement': The Belle Epoques of British and U.S. Hegemony Compared,” Politics & Society 31, 2 (2003): 325–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Arnold, David, “Looting, Grain Riots and Government Policy in South India 1918,” Past & Present, 84 (1979): 111–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “Famine in Peasant Consciousness and Peasant Action: Madras 1876–78,” in Guha, Ranajit, ed., Subaltern Studies III: Writings on South Asian History and Society (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Hardiman, David, “Usury, Dearth and Famine in Western India,” Past & Present, 152 (1996): 113–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogers, John D., “The 1866 Grain Riots in Sri Lanka,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 29, 3 (1987): 495–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Vernon, James, Hunger: A Modern History (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007), 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goswami, Manu, Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 210–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977–78, Senellart, Michel and Davidson, Arnold Ira, eds. (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 103–6Google Scholar.

57 Malthus, T. R. and James, Patricia, An Essay on the Principle of Population, or, a View of Its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness: With an Inquiry into Our Prospects Respecting the Future Removal or Mitigation of the Evils which It Occasions, vol. 1 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 10, 9–15Google Scholar.

58 Ambirajan, “Malthusian Population Theory.”

59 Brennan, Lance, “The Development of the Indian Famine Code,” in Currey, Bruce and Hugo, Graeme, eds., Famine as a Geographical Phenomenon (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1984), 94–101Google Scholar.

60 Report of the Indian Famine Commission, Part 1: Famine Relief (London: Printed by G. E. Eyre and W. Spottiswoode …, for H.M.S.O., 1880), 7, 9–10, 29Google Scholar.

61 Ahuja, Ravi, “State Formation and ‘Famine Policy' in Early Colonial South India,” Indian Economic & Social History Review 39, 4 (2002): 351–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Sharma, Sanjay, Famine, Philanthropy and the Colonial State: North India in the Early Nineteenth Century (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Goswami, Producing India, 73–102; Ludden, David, “India's Development Regime,” in Dirks, Nicholas B., ed., Colonialism and Culture (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, CSSH book series, 1992)Google Scholar; Kalpagam, U., “Colonial Governmentality and the ‘Economy,’” Economy and Society 29, 3 (2000): 418–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Naoroji, Dadabhai, Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (London: S. Sonnenschein, 1901), 216Google Scholar; Vernon, Hunger, 49–54.

65 Hunter, William Wilson Sir, England's Work in India (Smith, Elder, & Co., 1881), 1, 62Google Scholar.

66 Ibid., 60, 72–73, 80. See also Hunter's, The Indian Empire: Its History, People, and Products (London: Trubner & Co., 1882), 62–68Google Scholar.

67 Hunter to the Duke of Argyll, 12 Apr. 1889, in Skrine, Francis Henry and Hunter, William Wilson, Life of Sir William Wilson Hunter, K.C.S.I., M.A., Ll.D., a Vice-President of the Royal Asiatic Society, Etc (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1901), 394–95Google Scholar.

68 For example, Bradlaugh to Digby, 24 Sept. 1890, IOR, MSS Eur D767/7 (William Digby Papers).

69 Hunter to Digby, 21 Mar. 1889, IOR, MSS Eur F216/14 (George Birdwood Papers).

70 Bradlaugh to Digby, 28 Mar. 1890, IOR, MSS Eur D767/7 (William Digby Papers).

71 Inaugural Addresses by Presidents of the Indian National Congress with Mr. Charles Bradlaugh's Speech, Gokhale, Dikker Vishnu, ed. (Bombay: The Ripon Printing Press, 1895)Google Scholar. See also, Hunter, William Wilson Sir, Notes of a Speech on some Aspects of Indian Finance: Delivered at Birmingham on the Invitation of the Chamber of Commerce, 12 December, 1879 (Birmingham?: 1880?)Google Scholar. [The question marks are in the British Library card catalog reference, and no publication information is given in the work itself.]

72 Hunter to Birdwood, 23 Dec. 1888, IOR, MSS Eur F216/8 (George Birdwood Papers); Birdwood to Rhys Davids, 17 Jan. 1889, IOR, MSS Eur F216/14 (George Birdwood Papers).

73 Hunter to Birdwood, 10 Oct. 1888, MSS Eur F216/8 (George Birdwood Papers).

74 Hyndman to Besant, 5 June 1914, IOR, MSS Eur C888 (Annie Besant Papers); Soloway, Richard A., Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), 89–90Google Scholar.

75 Besant, Annie, The Law of Population: Its Consequences and Its Bearing upon Human Conduct and Morals (London: Freethought Publishing Company, 1877), 13, 14Google Scholar.

76 For examples from the 1870s censuses, see Caldwell, “Malthus and the Less Developed World,” 684. For other thinkers, see examples and discussion in Ambirajan, “Malthusian Population Theory,” 7.

77 “Neglected Aspects of the Indian Famine,” Economist, 28 Mar. 1874, 378–79. See also “The Indian Famine and the Indian Revenue,” Economist, 4 July 1874: 801–2.

78 Malthus and James, An Essay, vol. 2, 202–3.

79 Rothschild, Emma, “Social Security and Laissez Faire in Eighteenth-Century Political Economy,” Population and Development Review 21, 4 (1995): 725–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Malthus and James, An Essay, vol. 2, 201.

81 Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Furner, Mary O., Advocacy & Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky for the Organization of American Historians, 1975)Google Scholar.

82 Ross, Origins of American Social Science.

83 Furner, Advocacy & Objectivity, 123, 229–59. On Progressivism and opposition to Asian immigration, see Saxton, Alexander, The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975), 229–57Google Scholar; Matthews, Fred H., “White Community and 'Yellow Peril,'” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 50, 4 (1964): 612–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daniels, Roger, The Politics of Prejudice: The Anti-Japanese Movement in California and the Struggle for Japanese Exclusion (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962)Google Scholar.

84 On the links between immigration and interest in population, see Connelly, Matthew, “To Inherit the Earth: Imagining World Population, from the Yellow Peril to the Population Bomb,” Journal of Global History 1, 3 (2006): 299–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hodgson, Dennis, “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America,” Population and Development Review 17, 1 (1991): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Alexander Saxton, Indispensible Enemy, 100–3; Ross, “How Much Truth Is there in Malthus?” written for The Christian Century, 1947, Wisconsin Historical Society [hereafter WHS], Edward Allsworth Ross Papers, box 31, folder 7; Ross, “International Implications of the Present Nationalistic Tendencies of Nations,” n.d., p. 1, WHS, Ross Papers, box 31, folder 7.

86 Ross, Diaries and Travel Notes [hereafter DTN]: China, vol. 1, 12 Feb.–16 Mar. 1910, pp. 19–21, 27–33, 73, 109, 111, 141–43, 159, 165, 177, WHS, Ross Papers, box 26, folder 23; see also Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, p. 136, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6; Ross, Edward Alsworth, The Changing Chinese (New York: The Century Co., 1911), 117Google Scholar.

87 Ross to R. K. Mukerjee, 21 Aug. 1926, WHS, Ross Papers, box 15, folder 1.

88 Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, p. 11, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6.

89 Ross, Edward Alsworth, Standing Room Only? (New York: The Century Co., 1927), 93Google Scholar. See also Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, pp. 134–35, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6.

90 Ross, DTN: India, vol. 1, 1924–1935, pp. 107–9, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 5; Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, p. 24, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6.

91 Ross, Standing Room Only?, 55, 90, 91, 95, 96, 143, 288.

92 Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, pp. 144–45, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6.

93 Ross, Standing Room Only?, 285–313; Ross, DTN: India, vol. 2, 1924–1925, p. 140, WHS, Ross Papers, box 28, folder 6.

94 Connelly, Matthew, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008), 46–114Google Scholar; Bashford, “Nation, Empire, Globe”; Ittman, K., “Demography as a Policy Science in the British Empire, 1918–1969,” Journal of Policy History 15 (2003): 417–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Stoddard, Lothrop, The Rising Tide of Color against White World-Supremacy (New York: Scribner, 1921), 7–8Google Scholar.

96 East, Edward M., Mankind at the Crossroads (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1923), 121Google Scholar.

97 Several studies under the Third Republic anticipated later explanations of fertility transition, though they had little to say about mortality. These include: Landry, Adolphe, La Révolution Démographique: Études Et Essais Sur Les Problèmes De La Population (Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey, société anonyme, 1934)Google Scholar; Bertillon, Jacques, La Dépopulation De La France, Ses Conséquences, Ses Causes, Mesures À Prendre Pour La Combattre (Paris: F. Alcan, 1911)Google Scholar; Dumont, Arsène, Dépopulation Et Civilisation: Étude Démographique (Paris: Lecrosnier et Babé, 1890)Google Scholar; Bertillon, Louis, “Natalité (Démographie),” in Dechambre, A., ed., Dictionnaire Encyclopédique des Sciences Medicales (1876)Google Scholar. There is a large literature on the panic over French fertility decline. For analyses of the ideas of historical demographers, see Surkis, Judith, Sexing the Citizen: Morality and Masculinity in France, 1870–1920 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Cole, Joshua, The Power of Large Numbers: Population, Politics, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century France (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Offen, Karen, “Depopulation, Nationalism, and Feminism in Fin-De-Siecle France,” American Historical Review (1984): 648–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; McLaren, Angus, Sexuality and Social Order: The Debate over the Fertility of Women and Workers in France, 1770–1920 (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1982)Google Scholar; Charbit, Yves, Du Malthusianisme Au Populationnisme: Les Économistes Français Et La Population, 1840–1870 (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1981)Google Scholar.

98 Lefeuvre, Daniel, Chère Algérie: Comptes Et Mécomptes De La Tutelle Coloniale, 1930–1962 (Saint-Denis: Société française d'histoire d'outre-mer, 1997), 57–74Google Scholar.

99 Dennery, Étienne, Asia's Teeming Millions: And Its Problems for the West, Peile, John, trans. (London: J. Cape, 1931), 20–23, 17–18, 26–27, 130–60Google Scholar. Sociologist Gaston Bouthoul presented a similar argument, based on Dennery's work, in Bouthoul, Gaston, La Population Dans Le Monde (Paris: Payot, 1935), ch. 5Google Scholar.

100 G. Mesnard, “L'Algérie Restera-t-elle Française?” 11 Dec. 1936, Les Annales Coloniales: 1–2. Economist René Bertrand described Algeria's population patterns within a similar framework, in “L'Algérie Est-Elle Un Pays Riche?” Supplément Economique de la Revue Algeria, Apr. 1939: 94–98.

101 Ittman, “Demography as a Policy Science,” 421–26, 30, 39; “Transcript from a Meeting of the Commission on Higher Education in West Africa Held on December 9, 1943 in Dover House, Whitehall,” London School of Economics Archives, London, L B/3/12 (Alexander Carr-Saunders Papers).

102 Cooper, “Modernizing Bureaucrats”; Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine, Hemery, Daniel, and Piel, Jean, Pour Une Histoire Du Développement: États, Sociétés, Développement (Paris: L'Harmattan, 1988)Google Scholar; Constantine, Stephen, The Making of British Colonial Development Policy 1914–1940 (London: Cass, 1984)Google Scholar.

103 Ittman, “Demography as a Policy Science,” 424–25; Lafitte, François, “The Work of the Population Policies Committee,” Eugenics Review 31, 1 (1939): 47–56Google ScholarPubMed; Population Policies Committee, “General Principles of a Population Policy,” 15 May 1939, London School of Economics Archives, London, A/2/27/I/A (Carr-Saunders Papers).

104 Ittman, “Demography as a Policy Science”; Ittman, K., “The Colonial Office and the Population Question in the British Empire, 1918–62,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 27, 3 (1999): 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

105 Carr-Saunders to Ross, 26 Apr. 1930, WHS, Ross Papers, reel 17; Carr-Saunders to Ross, 16 Apr. 1926, WHS, Ross Papers, reel 16.

106 Szreter, “Idea of Demographic Transition”; Thompson, Warren S., “Population,” American Journal of Sociology 34, 6 (1929): 959–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Carr-Saunders, A. M., World Population, Past Growth and Present Trends (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936), chs. 2 and 3Google Scholar; Davis, “World Demographic Transition,” 2; Notestein, “Population,” 38, 54–55.

108 Rostow, W. W. and Kennedy, Michael, Theorists of Economic Growth from David Hume to the Present: With a Perspective on the Next Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 201Google Scholar.

109 Carr-Saunders, World Population, 291–92, 93.

110 Chakravarty, Sukhamoy, Development Planning: The Indian Experience (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), 14Google Scholar; Alterman, Jon B., Hopes Dashed: Egypt and American Foreign Assistance, 1952–1956 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Tignor, Robert L., W. Arthur Lewis and the Birth of Development Economics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), 42–78, 21–22, 240–67, 79Google Scholar; Hirschman, Albert O., “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics,” in Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 5–9Google Scholar; Lewis, W. Arthur, “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor,” in Kannepalli, Kanth Rajani, ed., Paradigms in Economic Development: Classic Perspectives, Critiques, and Reflections (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1994), 62–63Google Scholar.

112 Szreter, “Idea of Demographic Transition,” 673. On the links between modernization theory and various post-war theories of fertility change, see Greenhalgh, Susan, “Anthropology Theorizes Reproduction: Integrating Practice, Political Economic, and Feminist Perspectives,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the intellectual significance of Parsons to modernization theory, see Gilman, Mandarins of the Future, 72–112.

113 Gilman, Mandarins of the Future, 103–7.

114 Riesman, David, The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), 8, 9Google Scholar.

115 Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, 70–74.

116 Gilman, Mandarins of the Future, 34.

117 Alfred Sauvy, “Trois Mondes, Une Planète,” L'Observateur, 14 Aug. 1952: 14. For an analysis of the three worlds idea and its significance to modernization theory, see Pletsch, Carl E., “The Three Worlds, or the Division of Social Scientific Labor, Circa 1950–1975,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, 4 (1981): 565–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

118 For example, Davis, “World Demographic Transition,” 7–10.

119 Hodgson, “Orthodoxy and Revisionism,” 550; Szreter, “Idea of Demographic Transition,” 666–67; Caldwell, John C. and Caldwell, Pat, Limiting Population Growth and the Ford Foundation Contribution (Dover, N.H.: F. Pinter, 1986), 13–15Google Scholar.

120 Notestein, “Population,” 51–52; Davis, “World Demographic Transition,” 6.

121 On modernization theory and the anti-colonial tradition, see Latham, Modernization as Ideology.