Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:49:49.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colonialism and Forestry in India: Imagining the Past in Present Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

K. Sivaramakrishnan
K. Sivaramakrishnan
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Forests in India are at the center of highly charged conflicts. Use of the past by the different historical subjects engaged in these contests over forest lands in India results in several threads intertwined across a shared frame. I shall try to unravel only one strand in this essay, namely, the official ideologies implicated in colonial forestry and the technologies of power that it spawned. I will show how the colonial state, drawing on several pasts, constructed the question of forests in India.

Type
Capitalism, Colonialism, and the Gift of the Gods
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 3 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. “The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power through Bedouin Women.” American Ethnologist, 17:1, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adas, M. 1983. “Colonization, Commercial Agriculture and the Destruction of the Deltaic Rainforests of British Burma in the Late Nineteenth Century,” Tucker, R. P. and Richards, J. F., eds., in Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A. 1984. “Beyond Pretty Trees and Tigers: The Role of Ecological Destruction in the Emerging Patterns of Poverty and Peoples' Protests.” ICSSR Newsletter, 15:1, 1–27.Google Scholar
Agarwal, B. 1986. Cold Hearths and Barren Slopes: The Woodfuel Crisis in the Third World. Riverdale, MD: The Riverdale Company.Google Scholar
Ali, R.; Prasad, S. N.; and Gadgil, M.. 1983. “Forest Management and Forest Policy in India: A Critical Review.” Social Action, 27:2, 1–50.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. S., and Huber, W.. 1988. The Hour of the Fox: Tropical Forests. The World Bank, and the Indigenous People of Central India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Archer, William G. 1974. The Hill of Flutes: Life, Love and Poetry in Tribal India, A Portrait of the Santals. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 1982. “Rebellious Hillmen: The Gudem Rampa Rebellions (1829–1914).” Subaltern Studies, vol. 1. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BARS. 1852. “Report of the Committee Appointed by the British Association to Consider the Probable Effects in an Economical and Physical Point of View of the Destruction of Tropical Forests,” by Dr. Hugh Cleghorn, Madras Medical Establishment; Prof. Forbes Royle, King's College London; Capt.Google Scholar
Smith, R. Baird, Bengal Engineers; Strachey, R., Bengal Engineers. Journal of the Agricultural and Horticultural Society of India, 8:118–149.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, B. H. 1892. The Land Systems of British India. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, B. H.. 1893. Forest Law: A Course of Lectures on the Principles of Civil and Criminal Law and on the Law of the Forest. London: Bradbury, Agnew and Co.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, B. H. and Gamble, J. S., eds. 1875. Report of the Proceedings of the Forest Conference, 1873–1874. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Baker, David. 1991. “State Policy, the Markey Economy and Tribal Decline: The Central Provinces, 1861–1920.” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 28:4, 341–70.Google Scholar
Bandhopadhyay, J., and Shiva, V.. 1989. “Development, Poverty and the Growth of the Green Movement in India.” Ecologist, 19:3, 111–7.Google Scholar
Gayly, C. A. 1990. Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, C. P. 1987. “Green the People,” Agarwal, A., D'Monte, D. and Samarth, U., eds., in The Fight for Survival: Peoples' Action for the Environment. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H. P. 1989. Brazilian Policies that Encourage Deforestation in the Amazon. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, Environment Department Working Paper No. 16.Google Scholar
Birdwood, H. M. 1910. Indian Timbers: The Hill Forests of Western India. London: Journal of Indian Art and Industry.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P., and Brookfield, H., eds. 1987. Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Blanford, H. R. 1925. “Regeneration with the Assistance of Taungya in Burma.” Indian Forest Records, vol. XI: part III. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Blanford, H. R. 1958. “Highlights of One Hundred Years of Forestry in Burma.” Empire Forestry Review, 37:33–42.Google Scholar
Boom, B. 1987. “Ethnobotany of the Chacobo Indians.” Advances in Economic Botany, 4:1–68.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1873. The Distribution of Forests in India. Edinborough: McFarlane and Erskine.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1875. Memorandum on the Forest Legislation Proposed for British India. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1876. Suggestions Regarding Forest Administration in the Central Provinces. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1881. Suggestions Regarding Forest Management in Northwestern Provinces and Oudh. CalcuttaGovernment of India Press.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1883. Suggestions Regarding Forest Administration in the Madras Presidency. Madras: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1897. Indian Forestry. Woking: Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Brandis., D. 1971 [1906]. Indian Trees. Dehradoon: Bishen Singh, Mahendrapal Singh.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1976. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present, 70:30–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, N. 1955. Jungle Child. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 1983. “Conditions of Knowledge for Working Class Conditions: Employers, Government and the Jute Workers of Calcutta, 1890–1940.” Subaltern Studies, 3. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Champion, H. G.; and Seth, S. K.. 1968. Forest Types of India. Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Chatteriee, P. 1982. “Agrarian Relations and Communalism in Bengal.” Subaltern Studies, vol. 1. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatteriee, P. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cleghorn, H. 1860. The Forests and Gardens of South India. London: W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
Cohn, B. S. 1966. “Recruitment and Training of British Civil Servants in India, 1600–1860,” in Asian Bureucratic Systems Emergent From the British Imperial Tradition, Braibanti, R., ed. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, B. S. 1987. An Anthropologist among Historians and Other Essays. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, B. S.; and Dirks, N.. 1988. “Beyond the Fringe: The Nation State, Colonialism and the Technologies of Power.” Journal of Historical Sociology, 1:2, 224–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J.; and Comaroff, J. L.. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution, vol. 1. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. R.; Maxwell, R. S.; Thomas, P. D.; and Malone, J. J.. 1985. This Well Wooded Land: Americans and their Forests from Colonial Times to the Present. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Crosby, A. W. 1986. Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, C. 1980. The Open Field System and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, W. E. 1898. Preparation of Forest Working Plans in India. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. 1982. The Control of Resources. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, L. S.; and Johnson, K. N.. 1986. Forest Management. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Dhanagare, D. N. 1983. Peasant Movements in India, 1920–1950. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dirks, N. B. 1989. “The Invention of Caste: Civil Society in Colonial India.” Social Analysis, Special Issue:42–52.Google Scholar
Dirks, N. B. 1990. “The Original Caste: Power, History and Hierarchy in South Asia,” in India Through Hindu Categories, Marriott, McKim, ed. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. F. 1925. “Forestry in the Central Provinces and Berar.” Indian Forester, 51:345–56.Google Scholar
Edwardes, S. M. 1922. “Tree Worship in India.” Empire Forestry Journal, 1:1, 78–86.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1936. Leaves from the Jungle. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1938. The Baiga. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1942. The Agaria. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1945. “Saora fituris.” Man in India, 25:4, 154–7.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1950. Bondo Highlanders. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elwin, V. 1989. [1964]. The Tribal World of Verrier Elwin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Embree, A. T. 1969. “Landholding in India and British Institutions,” in Land Control and Social Structure in Indian History, Frykenburg, R. E., ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ensminger, J.; and Rutten, A.. 1991. “The Political Economy of Changing Property Rights: Dismantling a Pastoral Commons.” American Ethnologist, 18:4, 683–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, G. 1988. Food and Poverty: India's Half Won Battle. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Feierman, S. 1990. Peasant Intellectuals: History and Anthropology in Tanzania. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J. W. 1987. “Call to the Commons in Asturias,” in The Question of then Commons, McCay, B. and Acheson, J., ed. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, J. 1889. The Highlands of Central India: Notes on their Forests and Wild Tribes, Natural History and Sports. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. “History of Systems of Thought.” in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, Bouchard, D. F., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–77. Gordon, C., ed. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1991 [1978]. “Governmentality,” in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmen tality, Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P., eds. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Frietag, S. 1985. “Collective Crime and Authority in North India,” in Crime and Criminality in British India, Yang, A., ed. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M. 1985. “Social Restraints on Resource Utilization: The Indian Experience,” in Culture and Conservation: The Human Dimension in Environmental Planning, McNeely, J. A. and Pitt, D., eds. London: Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M. and Vartak, V. D.. 1976. “The Sacred Groves of Western Ghats in India.” Economic Botany, 30:152–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M. and Malhotra, K. C.. 1983. “Adaptive Significance of the Indian Caste System: An Ecological Perspective.” Annals of Human Biology, 10:5, 465–78.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M. and Guha, Ramachandra. 1992. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gholz, H. L. 1987. Agroforestry: Realities, Possibilities and Potentials. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. 1973. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Calcutta: Eastern Law House.Google Scholar
Glacken, C. J. 1967. Traces on the Rhodian Shore. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Government of India. 1988. National Forest Policy. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests.Google Scholar
Grove, R. 1988. 'Conservation and Colonialism: The Evolution of Environmental Attitudes and Conservation Policies on St. Helena, Mauritius and in Western India, 1660–1854, in Changing Tropical Forests: Historical Perspectives on Todays's Challenges in Asia, Australasia and Oceania, Dargavel, J., Dixon, K. and Simple, N., eds. Canberra: Center for Resources and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
Grove, R. 1989. “Scottish Missionaries, Evangelical Discourses and the Origin of Conservation Thinking in Southern Africa, 1820–1900.” Journal of Southern African History, 15:163–87.Google Scholar
Grove, R. 1993. “Conserving Eden: The (European) East India Companies and their Environmental Policies on St. Helena, Mauritus and in Western India, 1660 to 1854.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 36:3, 318–351.Google Scholar
Grunebaum, J. 1987. Private Ownership. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1989. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1990. “An Early Environmental Debate: The Making of the 1878 Forest Act.” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27:1, 65–84.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1991. “Dietrich Brandis and Indian Forestry: The Road Not Taken.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Guha, R. and Gadgil, M.. 1989. “State Forestry and Social Conflict in British India: A Study in the Ecological Bases of Agrarian Protest.” Past and Present, 123:141–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guha, Ranajit, ed. 1982–1989. Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Vols. 1–6. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit 1982. “The Prose of Counter-Insurgency.” Subaltern Studies, vol. 1. Delhi:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit 1983. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit 1987. “Chandra's Death.” Subaltern Studies, vol. 5. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habib, I. 1985. “Studying a Colonial Economy without Perceiving Colonialism.” Modern Asian Studies, 19:3, 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardiman, D. 1987. The Coming of the Devi: Adivasi Assertion in Western India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, G. 1922. “The Indian Forest Research Institute.” Empire Forestry Journal, 1:247–52.Google Scholar
Hays, S. P. 1959. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Henley, P. 1982. The Panare: Tradition and Change in the Amazonian Frontier. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, J. 1975. “Railways and the Expansion of Markets in India, 1861–1921.” Explorations in Economic History, 12:260–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperial Forest College. 1906. A Manual of Forest Law. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Isaacman, Allen. 1990. “Peasants and Rural Social Protest in Africa.” African Studies Review, 33:1–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodha, N. S. 1985. “Population Growth and the Decline of Common Property Resources in Rajasthan, India.” Population and Development Review, 11:2, 247–64.Google Scholar
Jain, S. K. 1981. Glimpses of Indian Ethnobotany. New Delhi: Oxford and India Bok House.Google Scholar
Joshf, H. B, ed. 1980 [1921]. Troup's Silviculture of Indian Trees. Dehradoon: Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kelly, W. W. 1991. “Directions in the Anthropology of Contemporary Japan.” Annual Review of Anthropology, no. 20, 395–431.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1977. Political Systems of Highland Burma. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Legislative Department. 1890. The Indian Forest Act, 1878, as modified upto 1890. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1972. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Lowood, H. E. 1990. “The Calculating Forester: Quantification, Cameral Science and the Emergence of Scientific Forestry Management in Germany,” in The Quantifying Spirit in the Eighteenth Century, Frangsmyr, T., Heilbron, J. L., and Rider, R. E. eds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1990 [1852]. The 18th. Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International.Google Scholar
Mayaram, S. 1991. “Criminality or Community: Alternate Constructions of the Mev Narrative of Darya Khan.” Contributions to Indian Sociology, 25:1, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, N. 1988. “Three Hundred Years ofTaungya.” Human Ecology, 16:4,361–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, C. 1990. Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender and Science in New England. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, T. R. 1964. The Aftermath of Revolt: India 1857–1870. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, T. R. 1979. Land, Landlords and the British Raj. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, M. V. 1989. The Political Economy of Forest Use and Management. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nigam, S. 1990. “The Making of a Colonial Stereotype-the Criminal Tribes and Castes of North India,” Part I of “Disciplining and Policing the ‘Criminals by Birth.’” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27:2, 131–64.Google Scholar
Nigam, S. 1990. 'The Development of a Disciplinary System, 1871–1900, Part II of “Disciplining and Policing the ‘Criminals by Birth.’” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27:3, 257–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, J.; and Roseberry, W., eds. 1991. “Introduction.” Golden Ages, Dark Ages: Imagining the Past in Anthropology and History. Berkeley: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hanlon, R. 1988. “Recovering the Subject: Subaltern Studies and Histories of Resistance in Colonial South Asia.” Modern Asian Studies, 22:1, 189–224.Google Scholar
Orlove, B. S. 1980. “Ecological Anthropology.” Annual Review of Anthropology, no. 9:235–73.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26:1, 126–66.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. 1989. High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paehlke, R. C. 1989. Environmentalism and the Future of Progressive Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, G. 1980. “A View of the Observable: A Positivist Understanding of Agrarian Society and Political Protest in Colonial India.” Journal of Peasant Studies, 7:3, 375–83.Google Scholar
Pant, G. B. 1922. The Forest Problem in Kumaon. Nainital: Gyanodaya Prakashan.Google Scholar
Parker, R. N. 1923. “The Indian Forest Department.” Empire Forestry Journal, 2:1, 34–41.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. S.; and Brown, H. P.. 1981 [1932]. The Commercial Timbers of India. Delhi: Researchco Reprints.Google Scholar
Peluso, N. L. 1991. “The History of State Forest Management in Java.” Forest and Conservation History, 35:2, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluso, N. L. 1992. Rich Forest, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Peters, P. 1987. “Embedded Systems and Rooted Models,” in The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecoligy of Communal Resources, McCay, B. and Acheson, J., eds. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Pinchot, G. 1947. Breaking New Ground. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. Reissued by Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1974.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, G. 1990. “Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32:2, 383–408.Google Scholar
Radhaktishna, M. 1989. “The Criminal Tribes Act in Madras Presidency: Implicatio?s for Itinerant Trading Communities.” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 26:3, 269–95.Google Scholar
Rangarajan, M. 1992. “Forest Policy in the Central Provinces, 1860–1914.” Unpublished D. Phil thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Rangarajan, M. 1994. “Imperial Agendas and India's Forests: The Early History of Indian Forestry, 1800–1878.” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 31:2, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repetto, R.; and Holmes, T.. 1983. “The Role of Population in Resource Depletion in Developing Countries.” Population and Development Review, 9:4; 609–32.Google Scholar
Repetto, R.; and Gillis, M.. 1989. Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reports. 1900–1930. The Forest Administration of the Central Provinces. Nagpur: Central Provinces Administration.Google Scholar
Ribbentrop, B. 1900. Forestry in British India. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Ribbentrop, B. 1902. Termes Taprobanes-White Ants as Pests of Trees. Nagpur: Department of Land Records and Agriculture, Central Provinces.Google Scholar
Richards, J. F.; and McAlpin, M. B.. 1983. 'Cotton Cultivating and Land Clearing in the Bombay Deccan and Karnatak: 1818–1920. in Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy, Tucker, R. P. and Richards, J. F., eds. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, A.; and Bondanella, J. C., eds. 1988. Rousseau's Political Writings. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rodger, A. 1925. “Research in Forestry in India.” Empire Forestry Journal, 4:45–53.Google Scholar
Roseberry, W. 1991. “Potatoes, Sacks and Enclosures in Early Modern England,” in Golden Ages, Dark Ages: Imagining the Past in Anthropology and History, O'Brien, Jay and Roseberry, W., eds. Berkeley: University Press.Google Scholar
Rustomji, N. R. 1990. Verrier Elwin: Philanthropologist. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabean, D. 1984. Power in the Blood: Popular Culture and Village Discourse in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Island Kingdom. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,Google Scholar
Said, E. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. 1984. “The Conditions and Nature of Subaltern Militancy: Bengal from Swad eshi to Non-cooperation.” Subaltern Studies, vol. 3. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saxena, N. C. 1987. Social Forestry in the Hill Districts of Uttar Pradesh. Kathmandu: International Center for Integrated Mountain Development.Google Scholar
Schabel, H. G. 1990. “Tanganyika Forestry under German Colonial Administration, 1891–1919.” Forest and Conservation History, 34:3, 130–43.Google Scholar
Schlich, W. 1925. “The Indian Forester, 1875–1925.” Indian Forester, 51:7, 291–301.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant.' Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 1991. Ecology and the Politics of Survival: Conflicts over Natural Resources in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Singh, C. 1986. Common Property and Common Poverty: India's Forests, Forest Dwellers and the Law. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1987. “Forests in Development.” Seminar, 330:27–32.Google Scholar
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1992. “Persistent Elites and Social Change: Agrarian Relations in Colonial Bengal, 1750–1950.” Yale Graduate Journal of Anthropology, 4:1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Sivaramakrishnan, K. 1994. “Situating the Subaltern: History and Anthropology in the Subaltern Studies Project.” Unpublished manuscript presently under review.Google Scholar
Somanathan, E. 1991. “Deforestation, Property Rights and Incentives in Central Himalaya.” Wastelands News, 7:1, 14–27.Google Scholar
Stebbfng, E. P. 1922. The Forests of India, vol. 1. London: John Lane.Google Scholar
Stebbfng, E. P. 1926. The Forests of India, vol. 3, London: John Lane.Google Scholar
Stein, B. 1983. “Idiom and Ideology in Early Nineteenth Century South India,” in Rural India: Land Power and Society under British Rule, Robb, P., ed. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Stein, B. 1990. Thomas Munro: The Origins of the Colonial State and his Visions of Empire. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, E. 1959. The English Utilitarians and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, E. 1986. The Peasant Armed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thapar, R. 1978. Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations. Delhi: Orient Longmans.Google Scholar
Thapar, R. 1989. “Imagined Religious Communities: Ancient History and the Modern Search for Hindu Identity.” Modern Asian Studies, 23:2, 209–31.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. “Eighteenth Century English Society: Class Struggle without Class.” Social History, 3:2, 133–65.Google Scholar
Tinker, H. 1966. “Structure of the British Imperial Heritage,” in Asian Bureaucratic Systems Emergent from British Imperial Tradition, Braibanti, R., ed. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Trevor, C. G. 1923. “Review of Indian Forest Management.” Empire Forestry Journal, 2:2, 243–48.Google Scholar
Troup, R. S. 1980 [1921]. Sylviculture of Indian Trees. Dehradoon: Forest Research Institute.Google Scholar
Troup, R. S. 1940. Colonial Forest Administration. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. P. 1983. “The British Colonial System and the Forests of the Western Himalayas,” in Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy, Tucker, R. P. and Richards, J. F., eds. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. P. 1989. “The Depletion of India's Forests under British Imperialism: Planters, Foresters and Peasants in Assam and Kerala,” in The Ends of the Earth, Worster, D., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Umney, J. C. 1896. Report on Carica Papaya. Calcutta: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
Von Furer Haimnedorf, C. 1943. The Chenchus: Jungle Folk of the Deccan. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Von Furer Haimnedorf, C. 1945. “Aboriginal Rebellions in the Deccan.” Man in India, 25:4, 208–16.Google Scholar
Von Furer Haimnedorf, C. 1945. The Reddis of the Bison Hills. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Von Furer Haimnedorf, C. 1948. The Raj Goads of Adilabad. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Von Furer Haimnedorf, C. 1982. Tribes of India: Struggle for Survival. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, R. 1988. Village Republics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Washbrook, D. A. 1981. “Law, State and Society in Colonial India,” in Power, Profit and Politics, Baker, C., Johnson, G., and Gallagher, J., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watt, G. 1889–1896 [1972]. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications.Google Scholar
Whitcombe, E. 1972. Agrarian Conditions in North India, Uttar Pradesh: 1860–1900. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
White, L. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science, no. 155, 1203–7.Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E. 1989. Land Filled with Flies: A Political Economy of the Kalahari. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Zaidi, S. 1989. “The Mughal State and Tribes in Seventeenth Century Sind.” Indian Economic and Social History Review, 26:3, 343–62.Google Scholar