Article contents
The Dialectics of Remembrance: Memories of Empire in Cold War Japan
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2013
Abstract
Between 1895 and 1945 Japan assembled one of the largest empires in modern world history. It vanished abruptly in the summer of 1945 at the end of the Second World War, and seemed to leave no trace in public consciousness. Historians, too, have portrayed postwar Japan as characterized by a virtual erasure of the imperial past. This article draws on recent scholarship to argue that things were more complicated than that. While references to the imperial past indeed dwindled after about 1960, immediate forgetting did not exhaust the reactions by individuals and interest groups. Some social milieus experienced the dissolution of the empire much more profoundly than official discourse would suggest. Since the mid-1990s, Japan's imperial past has reemerged as a major field of historical inquiry and a more general concern in public debate. In this article I situate the dialectic of remembering and forgetting within larger processes and transformations of the postwar order in East Asia, in particular the American occupation and the emergence of the Cold War.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2013
References
1 Nish, Ian, “Regaining Confidence: Japan after the Loss of Empire,” Journal of Contemporary History 15 (1980): 181–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here 194.
2 Kōjin, Karatani, “The Discursive Space of Modern Japan,” in Miyoshi, Masao and Harootunian, Harry D., eds., Japan in the World (Durham: Duke University Press, 1993)Google Scholar. A similar point was made by Yoon Keun-cha, in Nihon kokuminron: kindai Nihon no aidentitī (Tokyo: Chikuma shobō, 1997)Google Scholar.
3 For a recent overview, see Perraudin, Michel and Zimmerer, Jürgen, eds., German Colonialism and National Identity (London: Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar.
4 Cannadine, David, “Apocalypse When? British Politicians and British ‘Decline’ in the Twentieth Century,” in Clarke, Peter and Trebilcock, Clive, eds., Understanding Decline: Perceptions and Realities of British Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 261–62.Google Scholar
5 Porter, Andrew, The Absent-Minded Imperialists: What the British Really Thought about Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar, 269.
6 Stora, Benjamin, La Gangrène et l'oubli: la mémoire de la guerre d'Algérie (Paris: Editions La Découverte, 1991)Google Scholar.
7 This term was coined by Ward, Stuart, in “Echoes of Empire,” History Workshop Journal 62 (2006): 264–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quote 266.
8 See Ward, Stuart, ed., British Culture and the End of Empire (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Webster, Wendy, Englishness and Empire 1939–1965 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Hall, Catherine and Rose, Sonya O., eds., At Home with the Empire: Metropolitan Culture and the Imperial World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine, Enjeux politiques de l'histoire coloniale (Paris: Agone, 2009)Google Scholar; Shepard, Todd, The Invention of Decolonization: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Ribeiro, Margarida Calafate and Ferreira, Ana Paula, Fantasmas e Fantasias Imperiais no Imaginário Português Contemporâneo (Porto: Campo das Letras, 2003)Google Scholar; Andall, Jacqueline and Duncan, Derek, eds., Italian Colonialism: Legacy and Memory (Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar; Willems, Wim, De uittocht uit Indië: De geschiedenis van Indische Nederlanders, 1945–1995 (Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2001).Google Scholar
9 On the different phases of Japan's assimilation politics, see Ching, Leo T. S., Becoming ‘Japanese’: Colonial Taiwan and the Politics of Identity Formation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
10 For overviews of the Japanese colonial empire, see Beasley, W. G., Japanese Imperialism 1894–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Peattie, Mark and Myers, Ramon H., eds., The Japanese Colonial Empire 1895–1945 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Duus, Peter and Peattie, Mark, eds., The Japanese Informal Empire in China, 1895–1937 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Duus, Peter, ed., The Japanese Wartime Empire, 1931–1945 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar. See also Kōza, Iwanami, Kindai Nihon to shokuminchi, 8 vols. (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1992–1993).Google Scholar
11 See Duara, Prasenjit, Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003)Google Scholar. On Manchukuo, see also Matsusaka, Yoshihisa Tak, The Making of Japanese Manchuria, 1904–1932 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Wilson, Sandra, The Manchurian Crisis and Japanese Society, 1931–1933 (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
12 See Najita, Tetsuo and Harootunian, Harry. D., “Japanese Revolt against the West: Political and Cultural Criticism in the Twentieth Century,” in Duus, Peter, ed., The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 6: The Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Harootunian, Harry D., Overcome by Modernity: History, Culture, and Community in Interwar Japan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Calichman, Richard F., ed., Overcoming Modernity: Cultural Identity in Wartime Japan (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
13 According to official Japanese taxonomy, all territories acquired after 1889 (the promulgation of the Meiji constitution) were considered colonies: Taiwan, Karafuto, Korea, and Nanyō. This excluded an important dimension of Japanese empire building, namely internal colonialism in Hokkaido and Okinawa (“internal” because these territories were incorporated into the Japanese nation-state as naichi, internal territories), as well as Manchukuo, which was formally not a colony but an autonomous state.
14 See the argument by Eskildsen, Robert, “Of Civilization and Savages: The Mimetic Imperialism of Japan's 1874 Expedition to Taiwan,” American Historical Review 107 (2002): 388–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Schmid, Andre, “Colonialism and the ‘Korea Problem’ in the Historiography of Modern Japan, A Review Article,” Journal of Asian Studies 59 (2000): 951–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 This argument has been made most forcefully by scholars in the field of postcolonial studies. See, for example, Sang-jung, Kang, Orientarizumu no kanata e: Kindai bunka hihan (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1996)Google Scholar; Takeshi, Komagome, Shokuminchi teikoku Nihon no bunka tōgō (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1996)Google Scholar; Ichirō, Tomiyama, Kindai Nihon shakai to ‘Okinawajin’: “Nihonjin” ni naru to iu koto (Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha, 1990)Google Scholar; Tanaka, Stefan, Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
16 Hiroshi, Hashiya, Teikoku Nihon to shokuminchi toshi (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2004).Google Scholar
17 Young, Louise, Japan's Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998)Google Scholar. On city planning, see also Akira, Koshizawa, Manshūkoku no shuto keikaku: Tōkyō no genzai to mirai o tou (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō, 1988).Google Scholar
18 Gluck, Carol, “The ‘End’ of the Postwar: Japan at the Turn of the Millennium,” Public Culture 10 (1997): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Watt, Lori, When Empire Comes Home: Repatriation and Reintegration in Postwar Japan (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 3.
20 Ching, Leo, “‘Give Me Japan and Nothing Else!’: Postcoloniality, Identity, and the Traces of Colonialism,” in Yoda, Tomiko and Harootunian, Harry, eds., Japan after Japan: Social and Cultural Life from the Recessionary 1990s to the Present (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006)Google Scholar, 148.
21 Watt, When Empire Comes Home.
22 Ching, “‘Give Me Japan’,” 148. For a similar reading, see Ichirō, Tomiyama, Sensō no kioku (Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha, 1995), 108–12.Google Scholar
23 Quoted in Toyomi, Asano, Teikoku Nihon no shokuminchi hōsei (Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Shuppankai, 2008)Google Scholar, 571.
24 Masao, Maruyama, “Kaikoku,” in Maruyama Masao Shū, vol. 8 (Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten, 1996), 45–86.Google Scholar
25 See Forsberg, Aaron, America and the Japanese Miracle: The Cold War Context of Japan's Postwar Economic Revival, 1950–1960 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000).Google Scholar
26 On the presence of the United States in Japan, see: Dower, John, Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II (New York: Norton, 1999)Google Scholar; Shun'ya, Yoshimi, “‘America’ as Desire and Violence: Americanization in Postwar Japan and Asia during the Cold War,” in Chen, Kuan-Hsing and Chua, Beng Hua, eds., Inter Asia Cultural Studies Reader (London: Routledge 2007), 246–66Google Scholar; Auslin, Michael, Pacific Cosmopolitans: A Cultural History of U.S.—Japan Relations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Röling, B.V.A. and Rüter, C. F., The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE): The Tokyo Judgment, 29 April 1946–12 November 1948, vol. 1. (Amsterdam: APA-University Press Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar, 53. See also Kentarō, Awaya, Tōkyō saibanron (Tokyo: Ōtsuki Shoten, 1989)Google Scholar; Totani, Yuma, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Gluck, Carol, “Operations of Memory: ‘Comfort Women’ and the World,” in Jager, Sheila Miyoshi and Mitter, Rana, eds., Ruptured Histories: War, Memory, and the Post-Cold War in Asia (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007), 47–77Google Scholar, here 51.
29 Chomsky, Noam, “The New World Order,” Agenda 62 (1991): 13–15Google Scholar, here 13.
30 On the “reverse course,” see Schonberger, Howard B., Aftermath of War: Americans and the Remaking of Japan 1945–1952 (Kent, Oh.: Kent State University Press, 1989)Google Scholar. For intellectual debates in the early postwar years, see Koschmann, J. Victor, Revolution and Subjectivity in Postwar Japan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
31 Kiyoshi, Inoue, Nihon gendaishi 1: Meiji Ishin (Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha, 1951).Google Scholar
32 See Kōkichi, Yamano, Okinawa henkan hitorigoto (Tokyo: Gyōsei, 1982).Google Scholar
33 Kiyoshi, Inoue, Nihon gendaishi 1: Meiji Ishin (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1951)Google Scholar; Naokichi, Ubukata, Shigeki, Tōyama, and Masatoshi, Tanaka, eds., Rekishizō saikōsei no kadai: Rekishigaku no hōhō to Ajia (Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobō, 1966).Google Scholar
34 Keu-Cha, Yoon, “Sengo rekishigaku no Ajiakan,” in Naohiro, Asao et al. , eds., Nihon tsūshi, Bekkan 1: Rekishiishiki no Genzai (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995), 249–79Google Scholar; Ryūichi, Narita, Kingendai Nihonshi to rekishigaku: Kakikaerarete kita kakkō (Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha, 2012).Google Scholar
35 Yoshimi, Takeuchi, Kindai no chōkoku (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō, 1983)Google Scholar. On Takeuchi, see Eiji, Oguma, “Minshu” to “Aikoku”: Sengo Nihon no nashonarizumu to kōkyōsei (Tokyo: Shinyōsha, 2002), 394–446Google Scholar; Calichman, Richard, Takeuchi Yoshimi: Displacing the West (Ithaca: Cornell East Asia Series, 2004).Google Scholar
36 See Watt, When Empire Comes Home; Ryūichi, Narita, “‘Hikiage’ to ‘Yokuryū,’” in Kurasawa, Aiko, ed., Iwanami kōza: Ajia Taiheiyō Sensō, Volume 4: Teikoku no sensō keiken (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2006).Google Scholar
37 Watt, When Empire Comes Home, 2.
38 Lie, John, Zainichi (Koreans in Japan): Diasporic Nationalism and Postcolonial Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Komai, Hiroshi, Foreign Migrants in Contemporary Japan (Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Keizō, Yamawaki, Kindai Nihon to gaikokujin rōdōsha (Tokyo: Akashi shoten, 1994)Google Scholar; Myon, Pak Chon, ed., Zainichi Chōsenjin: Rekishi, genjō, tenbō (Tokyo: Akashi shoten, 1995).Google Scholar
39 Yamamoto, Mari, Grassroots Pacifism in Post-War Japan: The Rebirth of a Nation (London: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the intellectual background, see Oguma, “Minshu” to “aikoku.”
40 Yoshikazu, Sakamoto, “Kenryoku seiji to heiwa undō,” Sekai 191 (Nov. 1961), 11–23Google Scholar, here: 20. See also Orr, James, The Victim as Hero: Ideologies of Peace and National Identity in Postwar Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2001).Google Scholar
41 Packard, George R., Protest in Tokyo: The Security Treaty Crisis of 1960 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sasaki-Uemura, Wesley, Organizing the Spontaneous: Citizen Protest in Postwar Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2001).Google Scholar
42 For the occupation period, see Dower, John, Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II (New York: Norton, 1999)Google Scholar; Braw, Monica, The Atomic Bomb Suppressed: American Censorship in Occupied Japan (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1991).Google Scholar
43 See Orr, Victim as Hero; Seraphim, Franziska, War Memory and Social Politics in Japan, 1945–2006 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the concept of “victimhood nationalism,” see also Lim, Jie-Hyun, “Victimhood Nationalism in Contested Memories: National Mourning and Global Accountability,” in Assmann, Aleida and Conrad, Sebastian, eds., Memory in a Global Age: Discourses, Practices and Trajectories (New York: Palgrave Macmillan) 2010, 138–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Fusao, Hayashi, Daitōa sensō kōteiron (Tokyo: Banchō Shobō, 1964).Google Scholar
45 Minear, Richard, “Nihon no rekishika to sensō, 1945–1965nen,” in Masanori, Nakamura et al. , eds., Sengo Nihon. Senryō to sengo kaikaku, Volume 5: Kako no seisan (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995), 133–56.Google Scholar
46 Saburō, Ienaga, Taiheiyō sensō (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1968)Google Scholar, 4.
47 See Seraphim, War Memory, 202–6; Toyomi, Asano, “The Collapse of the Japanese Empire and the Normalization of Its Relations with South Korea (1945–1965): Repatriation, Reparations, and External Assets Reconsidered,” in Kimitaka, Matsusato, ed., Comparative Imperiology (Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, 2010), 109–29.Google Scholar
48 Sang-Jung, Kang, Ajia kara Nihon o tou (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994)Google Scholar; Chen, Kuan-Hsing, Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 For an early example, see Naokichi, Ubukata, Shigeki, Tōyama, and Masatoshi, Tanaka, eds., Rekishizō saikōsei no kadai: Rekishigaku no hōhō to Ajia (Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobō, 1966).Google Scholar
50 Seraphim, War Memory.
51 Satoshi, Nakano, Tōnan Ajia senryō to Nihonjin: Teikoku/Nihon no kaitai (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2012).Google Scholar
52 Honda, Katsuichi, The Nanjing Massacre: A Japanese Journalist Confronts Japan's National Shame (Armonk: East Gate Book 1999)Google Scholar. On the debate, see Yoshida, Takashi, The Making of the “Rape of Nanking”: History and Memory in Japan, China, and the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53 On the Ienaga trials, see Duke, B. C., Japan's Militant Teachers: A History of the Left-Wing Teachers' Movement (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Hein, Laura and Selden, Mark, eds., Censoring History: Citizenship and Memory in Japan, Germany, and the United States (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, 2000).Google Scholar
54 Oguma Eiji, “Minshu” to “aikoku”; Eiji, Oguma, “The Postwar Intellectuals' View of ‘Asia,’” in Saaler, Sven and Koschmann, J. Victor, eds., Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History: Colonialism, Regionalism and Borders (London: Routledge, 2007), 200–12Google Scholar; Havens, Thomas R. H., Fire across the Sea: The Vietnam War and Japan, 1965–1975 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Quotes from Avenell, Simon Andrew, Making Japanese Citizens: Civil Society and the Mythology of the Shimin in Postwar Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).Google Scholar
56 See Midford, Paul, “Challenging the Democratic Peace? Historical Memory and the Security Relationship between Japan and South Korea,” Pacific Focus 23, 2 (2008): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 See Mori, Hiromi, Immigration Policy and Foreign Workers in Japan (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lie, Zainichi; Morris-Suzuki, Tessa, Borderline Japan: Foreigners and Frontier Controls in the Postwar Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Komai, Foreign Migrants. For a longer historical perspective, see Kawashima, Ken C., The Proletarian Gamble: Korean Workers in Interwar Japan (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 On Japanese foreign aid in the 1960s and 1970s, see Harrell, E. C., Japan's Postwar Aid Policies (New York: Columbia University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Yoshihara, Kunio, Japanese Investment in Southeast Asia (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 1978).Google Scholar
59 See Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Dower, John, “The Useful War,” in Dower, J., ed., Japan in War and Peace (New York: New Press, 1993), 9–32Google Scholar; Yukio, Noguchi, 1940 nen taisei (Tokyo: Tokyo Keizai Shimpōsha, 1995).Google Scholar
60 On the level of popular culture, see Igarashi, Yoshikuni, Bodies of Memory: Narratives of War in Postwar Japanese Culture, 1945–1970 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.
61 See Tamanoi, Mariko Asano, Memory Maps: The State and Manchuria in Postwar Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Watt, When Empire Comes Home; Narita Ryūichi, “‘Hikiage’ to ‘yokuryū’”; Cohen, Nicole Leah, “Return of the Natives? Children of Empire in Post-Imperial Japan,” in Bosma, Ulbe, Lucassen, Jan, and Oostindie, Geert, eds., Postcolonial Migrants and Identity Politics: Europe, Russia, Japan and the United States in Comparison (New York: Berghahn Books, 2012), 155–79.Google Scholar
62 See Trefalt, Beatrice, Japanese Army Stragglers and Memories of the War in Japan, 1950–1975 (London: Routledge, 2003)Google Scholar; Kōji, Wakaichi, Saigo no senshisha (Tokyo: Kawade Shobō, 1986).Google Scholar
63 See Hunt, Michael H., The American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Ekbladh, David, The Great American Mission: Modernization and the Construction of an American World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64 For accounts of the Hakone Conference, see Koschmann, Victor, “Modernization and Democratic Values: The ‘Japanese Model’ in the 1960s,” in Engerman, David C. et al. , eds., Staging Growth: Modernization, Development, and the Global Cold War (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2003), 225–50Google Scholar; Tanaka, Stefan, “Objectivism and the Eradication of Critique in Japanese History,” in Miyoshi, Masao and Harootunian, Harry D., eds., Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002), 80–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Conrad, Sebastian, “The Colonial Ties Are Liquidated: Modernization Theory, Postwar Japan and the Global Cold War,” Past & Present 216 (2012): 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65 See, for example, Haruki, Wada, “Gendaiteki ‘Kindaika'ron no shisō to ronri,” Rekishigaku kenkyû 318 (1966): 2–12.Google Scholar
66 To be sure, Ōtsuka's was a negative view of Japanese modernization, which he saw to be characterized by structural deficits and an incomplete transition to modernity. See Conrad, Sebastian, The Quest for the Lost Nation: Writing History in Germany and Japan in the American Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010), 178–84.Google Scholar
67 Weber, Max, Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004)Google Scholar, 197.
68 Hisao, Ōtsuka, “Robinson Kurūsō no ningen ruikei,” in Ōtsuka Hisao chōsakushû, vol. 8 (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1969), 215.Google Scholar
69 The prewar discourse of the composite nation was not uncontested, and some authors emphasized absolute racial differences in East Asia. For an assessment of these different positions, see Eiji, Oguma, Tan'itsu minzoku shinwa no kigen: Nihonjin no jigazō no keifu (Tokyo: Shinyōsha, 1995).Google Scholar
70 See Park, Won Soon, “Japanese Reparations Policies and the ‘Comfort Women’ Question,” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 5 (1997): 107–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Ryang, Sonia and Lie, John, eds., Diaspora without Homeland: Being Korean in Japan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71 See also Ching, “‘Give Me Japan.”
72 Field, Norma, In the Realm of a Dying Emperor: A Portrait of Japan at Century's End (New York: Vintage, 1993)Google Scholar; Buruma, Ian, Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan (London: Phoenix, 1994).Google Scholar
73 See Gluck, Carol, “The ‘End’ of the Postwar: Japan at the Turn of the Millennium,” Public Culture 10 (1997): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74 Seraphim, War Memory. See also Thomas, Julia Adeney, “Landscape's Mediation between History and Memory: A Visual Approach to Japan's Past, 1870–1945,” East Asian History 36 (2008): 55–72.Google Scholar
75 On the conflictual terrains of memory production between Japan and Korea in particular, see Dudden, Alexis, Troubled Apologies among Japan, Korea, and the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76 Nankin jiken chōsa kenkyûkai, Nankin daigyakusatsu hiteiron 13 no uso (Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobō, 1999)Google Scholar. For an analysis of this debate, see Fogel, Joshua A., The Nanjing Massacre in History and Historiography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77 Shōji, Yamada, Tadashi, Koshō, and Yūichi, Higuchi, Chōsenjin senji rōdō dōin (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2005)Google Scholar; Kratoska, Paul A., Asian Labor in the Wartime Japanese Empire: Unknown Histories (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, 2005).Google Scholar
78 On the issue of forced prostitution, see Yoshiaki, Yoshimi, Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Tanaka, Yuki, Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution during World War II and the US Occupation (London: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar; Soh, Chunghee Sarah, The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
79 See Minoru, Iwasaki et al. , eds., Keizoku suru shokuminchishugi: Jendā, minzoku, jinshu, kaikyû (Tokyo: Seikyûsha, 2005).Google Scholar
80 See VAWW-NET Japan, Nihon gunsei doreisei o sabaku: 2000nen josei kokusai senpan hōteino kiroku, 5 vols. (Tokyo: Ryokufu Shuppan, 2000–2002).Google Scholar
81 See Schmid, “Colonialism and the ‘Korea Problem.’”
82 Kang Sang-jung, Orientarizumu no kanata e; Komagome Takeshi, Shokuminchi teikoku Nihon no bunka tōgō; Yŏn-suk, Yi, ‘Kokugo’ to iu shisō (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1996)Google Scholar; Toshiaki, Yasuda, Shokuminchi no naka no ‘kokugogaku’ (Tokyo: Sangensha, 1997)Google Scholar. See also Tetsuya, Motoyama, Posuto koroniarizumu (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2005).Google Scholar
83 Nitchūkan Sangoku Kyōtsū Rekishi Kyōzai Iinkai, Mirai o hiraku rekishi: Ajia sankoku no kingendaishi (Tokyo: Kōbunken, 2005).Google Scholar
84 Naoki, Sakai, de Bary, Brett, and Toshio, Iyotani, eds., Nashonariti no datsukōchiku (Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobō, 1996)Google Scholar; Yōichi, Komori and Tetsuya, Takahashi, eds., Nashonaru hisutorī Ō koete (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1998)Google Scholar; Liu, Jie, Mitani, Hiroshi, and Yang, Daqing, Kokkyō o koeru rekishi ninshiki: Nitchū taiwa no kokoromi (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 2006)Google Scholar; Mitani, Hiroshi and Kim, Tae-Chang, eds., Higashi Ajia rekishi taiwa—Kokkyō to sedai o koete (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 2007).Google Scholar
85 Takashi, Okamoto, Sekai no naka no Nisshin-Kan kankeishi: kōrin to zokkoku, jishu to dokuritsu (Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2008).Google Scholar
86 See Ryûta, Itagaku, Jiyon, Chon, and Minoru, Iwasaki, eds., Tōajia no kioku no ba (Tokyo: Kawade Shobō, 2011).Google Scholar
87 Aiko, Kurasawa et al. , eds., Kōza—Ajia Taiheiyō Sensō, vols. 1–8 (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2005–2006)Google Scholar. See also Matsuura Masataka, “Dai Tōa Sensō” wa naze okita no ka: han Ajia shugi no seiji keizaishi (Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Shuppankai, 2010).
88 McCormack, Gavan, “Facing the Past: War and Historical Memory in Japan and Korea,” Asia-Pacific Journal 50, 4 (2008)Google Scholar, at: http://www.japanfocus.org/-Gavan-McCormack/2983.
89 Nobukatsu, Fujioka, Ojoku no kingendaishi (Tokyo: Tendensha, 1996).Google Scholar
90 See, especially, Nobukatsu, Fujioka, ed., Kyōkasho ga oshienai rekishi, 4 vols. (Tokyo: Tokuma Shoten, 1996–98)Google Scholar; See also the vehement reactions to these approaches in: Kyōkasho ni shinjitsu to jiyū o‘ renrakukai, ed., Tettei hihan: ‘Kokumin no rekishi’ (Tokyo: Ōtsuki Shoten, 2000)Google Scholar; Mitani, Hiroshi, ed., Rekishi kyōkasho mondai (Tokyo: Nihon Tosho Sentâ, 2007).Google Scholar
91 Yoshinori, Kobayashi, Sensōron (Tokyo: Gentôsha, 1998)Google Scholar. However, popular versions of the past are scarcely a new phenomenon.
92 Yoshinori, Kobayashi, Taiwanron (Tokyo: Shôgakkan, 2000)Google Scholar. On the debate, see Higashi Ajia Bunshitetsu Nettowāku, ed., Kobayashi Yoshinori Taiwanron o koete: Taiwan eno atarashii shiza (Tokyo: Sakuhinsha, 2001)Google Scholar; Tetsushi, Marukawa, “On Kobayashi Yoshinori's On Taiwan,” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 12 (2004): 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93 See, for example, Heita, Kawakatsu, Nihon bunmei to kindai seiyō (Tokyo: NHK Books, 1991)Google Scholar; Kanji, Nishio, Kokumin no rekishi, Atarashii rekishi kyōkasho o tsukuru kai, ed. (Tokyo: Sankei Shinbunsha, 1999).Google Scholar
94 On the German model, see Kentarō, Awaya, ed., Sensō sekinin—sengo sekinin: Nihon to Doitsu wa dō chigau ka (Tokyo: Asahi Shinbunsha, 1994)Google Scholar; Takeo, Satō, “Doitsu no sengo hoshō—Nihon no mohan ka,” Sekai 561 (1991): 296–309Google Scholar; Kanji, Nishio, Kotonaru higeki: Nihon to Doitsu (Tokyo: Bungei Shunjû, 1994).Google Scholar
95 Yoneyama, Lisa, “Transformative Knowledge and Postnationalist Public Sphere: The Smithsonian Enola Gay Controversy,” in Fujitani, Takashi, White, Geoffrey M., and Yoneyama, Lisa, eds., Perilous Memories: The Asia Pacific Wars (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001): 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96 See Field, Norma, “War and Apology: Japan, Asia, the Fiftieth, and After,” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 5, 1 (1997): 165–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gluck, “Operations of Memory.”
97 See Buchholz, Petra, Schreiben und Erinnern: Über den Umgang mit der Vergangenheit in Japan (München: Iudicium, 2002)Google Scholar; Figal, Gerald, “How to Jibunshi: Making and Marketing Self-Histories of Shōwa among the Masses in Postwar Japan,” Journal of Asian Studies 55 (1996): 902–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98 On regionalism in East Asia, see Pempel, T. J., ed., Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004)Google Scholar; Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, eds., Beyond Japan: The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006)Google Scholar. For an analysis of 1990s Japan, see also Yoda, Tomiko and Harootunian, Harry D., eds., Japan after Japan: Social and Cultural Life from the Recessionary 1990s to the Present (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Samuels, Richard J., Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
99 Ching, Leo, “Globalizing the Regional, Regionalizing the Global: Mass Culture and Asianism in the Age of Late Capital,” Public Culture 12 (2000): 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by