Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:43:49.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Contact as Drama and Manipulation in the Southern Highlands of Papua New Guinea: Pacification as the Structure of the Conjuncture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Edward L. Schieffelin
Affiliation:
University College London

Extract

Accounts of first contact in Papua New Guinea have aroused considerable interest over the years (Hides 1936; Leahy and Crain 1937; Nelson 1982; Connelly and Anderson 1987; Schieffelin and Crittenden 1991). No doubt, this has been in part because these accounts have an intrinsic drama and popular romantic appeal (intrepid explorers enter remote mountain valleys and discover vast populations of previously unknown tribes who had never seen white men before and believed they were supernatural beings). More recently, anthropologists and historians have begun examining these sorts of events to explore how historical and cultural forces unique or intrinsic to quite different societies become transformed when they come into contact with each other, a process, that Sahlins has termed the “structure of the conjuncture” (Sahlins 1980, 1985; Dening 1988). Accounts of the period immediately following first contact in Papua,1 during which Australian government officers extended political control over the newly discovered native Papuan tribesmen, however, are usually narratives of European (Australian) colonial history, with little sense of Papuan experience.

Type
Ethnographic Drama
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Connolly, R., and Anderson, R. 1987. First Contact. New York,: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Dening, G. 1980. Islands and Beaches. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dening, G.. 1988. History's Anthropology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Ernst, T. 1984. “Onabasulu Local Organization”. PhD Disser., University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Feld, Steven. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gerwertz, D., and Errington, F. 1991. Twisted Histories, Altered Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hides, J. G. 1935. Through Wildest Papua. London: Blackie and Son.Google Scholar
Hides, J. G.. 1936. Papuan Wonderland. London: Blackie and Son.Google Scholar
Kelly, Raymond C. 1977. Etoro Social Structure: A Study in Structural Contradiction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Peter. 1954. Road Belong Cargo. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Leahy, M., and Crain, M. 1937. The Land That Time Forgot. London: Hurst and Blackette.Google Scholar
Murray, J. H. P. 1912. Papua or British New Guinea. New York,: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. 1982. Taim Bilong Masta: The Australian Involvement with Papua New Guinea. Sydney: The Australian Broadcasting Commission.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1989. High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, R. 1987. Highlanders and Foreigners in the Upper Ramu: The Kainantu Area 1919–1942. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1981. Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Island. Kingdom (ASRO Special Publication No. I). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M.. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Souter, Gavin. 1963. New Guinea the Last Unknown. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric. 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar