Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:18:09.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Exclusion of Women From Industry in Nineteenth-Century Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Ellen Jordan
Ellen Jordan
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1868, a clergymen told the annual congress of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science that “he had long lived in the town of Liverpool, and had been placed in circumstances there which made him frequently regret that there were no places in which women could find employment. The great want was of employment for every class of women, not only for the higher class, but for those placed in humbler circumstances.” At earlier conferences, however, a number of speakers described the abundant opportunities for female employment in other Lancashire towns. Census figures make it clear that the reason lay in the different industrial bases of these towns.

Type
Shaping the Worlds of Labor
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 273 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Census figures in this article are taken from: British Parliamentary Papers, 1852–53, Vol. 88, ccxxii-ccxxvii; 1863, Vol. 53, xlii-xlv; 1873, Vol. 71, xxxvii-xlviii, 315–81, 430–37; 1883, Vol. 80, x-xvii; 1893–94, Vol. 106, x-xxv; 1903, Vol. 84, 186-201; 1913, Vol. 78, 12–24, 75–88; Collet, Clara, Report by Miss Collet on the Statistics of Employment of Women and Girls (London: H.M.S.O., 1894), 20–21Google Scholar; Marsh, David C., The Changing Social Structure of England and Wales 1871–1961 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977), 118, 134, 155.Google Scholar

1 “Employment of Females: Discussion,” Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 12 (1868), 607.Google Scholar

2 The question of regional female unemployment is dealt with in more detail in Jordan, Ellen, “Female Unemployment in England and Wales 1851–1911: An Examination of the Census Figures for 15–19 Year Olds,” Social History, 13:2 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Matthaei, Julie A., An Economic History of Women in America: Women's Work, the Sexual Division of Labour, and the Development of Capitalism (Brighton: Harvester, 1982), 193–94.Google Scholar

4 Matthaei, , An Economic History of Women in America, 211–18.Google Scholar

5 McKendrick, Neil, “Josiah Wedgwood and Factory Discipline,” The Historial Journal, 4:1 (1961), 38Google Scholar; Pinchbeck, Ivy, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850 (London: Cass, 1969), 88, 187–88Google Scholar; Martindale, Hilda, Women Servants of the State: A History of Women in the Civil Service (London: Allen and Unwin, 1938), 17–18.Google Scholar

6 Richards, Eric, “Women in the British Economy since about 1700: An Interpretation,” History, 59:3 (1974), 346, 347, 349, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Alexander, Sally, “Women's Work in Nineteenth Century London: A Study of the Years 1820–1850,” in The Rights and Wrongs of Women, Mitchell, Juliet and Oakley, Ann, eds. (Harxnondsworth: Penguin, 1976), 73.Google Scholar

8 Tilly, Louise A. and Scott, Joan W., Women, Work and Family (New York: Holt, 1978), 68–69, 76–77.Google Scholar

9 For example, Lown, Judy, “Not so much a factory, more a form of patriarchy; gender and class during industrialisation,” in Gender, Class and Work, Gamarnikow, Eva et al., eds. (London: Gower, 1985), 30–43.Google Scholar

10 Alexander, Sally, Davin, Anna, Hostettler, Eve, “Labouring Women: A Reply to Eric Hobsbawm,” History Workshop, 8 (Autumn 1979), 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 179; Tilly, and Scott, , Women, Work and Family, 124–25Google Scholar; Kumar, Krishan, “Unemployment as a Problem in the Development of Industrial Societies: the English Experience,” Sociological Review, 32:2 (05 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 230; Benson, John, “Work,” in The Working Class in England 1875–1914, Benson, John, ed. (London: Croom Helm 1985), 72–73.Google Scholar

11 “Events of the Month,” Englishwoman's Review, 6:31 (11 1875)Google Scholar, 513; Collet, Clara E., “Women's Work,” in Life and Labour of the People in London First Series: Poverty, Booth, Charles, ed. (New York: A.M.S. Press, 1970), IV, 278Google Scholar, 283; Cadbury, Edward, Matheson, M. Cécilie, and Shann, George, Women's Work and Wages: A Phase of Life in an Industrial City (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1906), 46–47Google Scholar, 92–93, 95, 166; Bird, M. Mostyn, Woman at Work: A Study of the Different Ways of Earning a Living Open to Women (London: Chapman and Hall, 1911), 25–26Google Scholar; Alexander, , “Women's Work in Nineteenth Century London,” 89–90.Google Scholar

12 This very high figure is probably due to a change in the definition of commercial clerks. Joyce M. Bellamy notes that in 1881 this category was extended to include clerks working in industry as well as in purely commercial firms. “Occupation Statistics in the Nineteenth Century Censuses,” in The Census and Social Structure: An Interpretative Guide to Nineteenth Century Censuses for England and Wales, Lawton, Richard, ed. (London: Frank Cass, 1978), 168.Google Scholar

13 Drake, Barbara, Women in Trade Unions (London: Virago, 1984), 6Google Scholar; Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 274; British Parliamentary Papers 1892, Vol. 34, 226–27Google Scholar; Gulley, A. Amy, “The Employment of Women: The Lady Assistant Commissioners' Report,” Fortnightly Review, 61 o.s., 55 n.s. (01 1894), 42Google Scholar; Gulley, A. Amy and Whitley, Margaret, Women's Work (London: Methuen, 1894), 110–11Google Scholar; Cadbury et al., Women's Work and Wages, 39–40.Google Scholar

14 Gulley, , “The Employment of Women,” 41.Google Scholar

15 Hartmann, Heidi, “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex,” Signs, supplement, I:3 (Spring 1976), 151Google Scholar, 152, 153–55. This explanation is seen as significant for the United States by Matthaei, Julia A., An Economic History of Women in America, 217; and for Britain by Cynthia Cockburn, Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Changes (London: Pluto Press, 1983), 23–35Google Scholar, and Walby, SylviaPatriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment (London: Polity Press, 1986), chap. 5).Google Scholar

16 Rose, Sonya O., “Gender at Work': Sex, Class and Industrial Capitalism,” History Workshop, 21 (spring 1986), 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Rose, , “Gender at Work'”, 118–19; Cockburn, , Brothers, 151–59.Google Scholar

18 Drake, , Women in Trade Unions, 4; Pinchbeck, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 276Google Scholar; Boston, Sarah, Women Workers and the Trade Union Movement (London: Davis-Poynter, 1980), 17Google Scholar; Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 5 (1861), 634.Google Scholar

19 Snell, K. D. M., Annals of the Labouring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England, 1600–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 61–63, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Coleman, Terry, The Railway Navvies (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), 67Google Scholar, 190; Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 257.Google Scholar

21 Lown, , “Not so Much a Factory, More a Form of Patriarchy,” 36–43.Google Scholar

22 Davidoff, Leonore anḍ Hall, Catherine, Family Fortunes: Men and women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), 179.Google Scholar

23 Greg, W. R., Literary and Social Judgments (London: Bungay, 1868), 363–64.Google Scholar

24 Oliphant, Margaret, “The Condition of Women,” Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, 83 (02 1858), 145.Google Scholar

25 Bessie Parkes, Rayner, Essays on Women's Work (London: Strahan, 1865), 22.Google Scholar

26 Lown, , “Not So Much a Factory,” 39–41Google Scholar. For similar provisions for the presumed needs of women made in the lace warehouse of Adams and Co. in Nottingham, see Baker, R. Smith, “The Social Results of the Employment of Girls and Women in Factories and Workshops,” Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 12 (1868), 546.Google Scholar

27 British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 14, C25.Google Scholar

28 Medick, Hans, “The Proto-industrial Family Economy: The Structural Function of Household and Family during the Transition from Peasant Society to Industrial Capitalism, Social History, 1:3 (10 1976), 291–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rule, John, The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry (London: Croom Helm, 1981), 42–44.Google Scholar

29 Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 113–114.Google Scholar

30 Pinchbeck, Quoted, Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 278.Google Scholar

31 Dilke, Emilia F. S., “The Indust?al Position of Women,” Fortnightly Review, 60 o.s., 54 n.s. (10, 1893), 501Google Scholar; Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 272–273Google Scholar; Rule, The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry, 26, 36.Google Scholar

32 Wright, J. S., “On the Employment of Women in Factories in Birmingham,” Transactions of the National Associojion for the Promotion of Social Science, 1 (1857), 539–42Google Scholar; Cadbury et al., Women's Work and Wages, 50–72.Google Scholar

33 Mckendrick, , “Josiah Wedgwood and Factory Discipline,” 33, 38; British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 14, c4, c11.Google Scholar

34 British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 14, f83–f84Google Scholar, f91–f94. Malcolmson, R. W., Life and Labour in England 1700–1780 (London: Hutchinson, 1981), 44.Google Scholar

35 Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 114–15Google Scholar; Rule,The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry, 25Google Scholar; Malcolmson, , Life and Labour in England 1700–1780, 47–48.Google Scholar

36 British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 14, F23Google Scholar, d37, f35–f36, f94–f95, f121–f126; Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 209–26Google Scholar, 276; Rule, The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry, 25–26Google Scholar; Malcolmson, , Life and Labour in England 1700–1780, 43.Google Scholar

37 British Parliamentary Papers 1864, Vol. 22, 11Google Scholar; Gulley, and Whitley, , Women's Work, 111.Google Scholar

38 British Parliamentary Papers 1863, Vol. 18, 264, 237; 1864, Vol. 22, 197.Google Scholar

39 British Parliamentary Papers 1842, Vol. 17, 177Google Scholar, 181; Pollard, Sidney, The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain (London: Arnold, 1965), 41–42, 45.Google Scholar

40 Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 148,Google Scholar 155–56, 186–87; Pollard, , The Genesis of Modern Management, 43Google Scholar; Anderson, Michael, Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971), 115–17Google Scholar; Tilly and Scott, Women, Work and Family, 112–13Google Scholar; Rule, The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth Century Industry, 30.Google Scholar

41 British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 14, A3Google Scholar, B43–B44, d39–d43; Vol. 15, L4, 133–137, r8; Coleman, D. C., The British Paper Industry 1495–1860: A Study in Industrial Growth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958), 38–39, 191–95, 292–95, 307.Google Scholar

42 British Parliamentary Papers 1843, Vol. 13, 18.Google Scholar

43 Boucherett, Jessie, “The Industrial Movement,” in The Woman Question in Europe, Stanton, Theodore, ed. (London: Sampson Low, 1884), 92–93Google Scholar; Kaye, J. W., “The Employment of Women,” North British Review, 26 (02 1857), 330Google Scholar; Boucherett, Jessie, Hints on Self-Help: A Book for Young Women (London: Partridge, 1863), 29.Google Scholar

44 Pollard, , The Genesis of Modern Management, 75–76.Google Scholar

45 British Parliamentary Papers 1842, Vol. 17, 478–79, 504, 511, 594, 623.Google Scholar

46 Pollard, , The Genesis of Modern Management, 175–76.Google Scholar

47 Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 282–86.Google Scholar

48 British Parliamentary Papers 1864, Vol. 22b, 182, 190.Google Scholar

49 Pinchbeck, , Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution, 282–83.Google Scholar