Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:31:32.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Taxation and the “Armenian Question” during the Late Ottoman Empire, 1876–1908

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2012

Nadır Özbek
Nadır Özbek*
Affiliation:
Atatürk Institute, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul
*
ozbekn@boun.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the social and political context of the Ottoman Armenian massacres during the reign of Sultan Abdülhamid II focusing on the empire's tax regime. Although important research has been done on the massacres of 1894–1897, little has been written on the role the tax regime and collection practices played in preparing the context for increased state and communal violence in the “six provinces” (vilayat-ı sitte)—Erzurum, Van, Bitlis, Mamretülaziz, Sivas, and Diyarbekir—where the great majority of Ottoman Armenians lived. Political and social historians have paid little attention to the Ottoman state's administrative practices in Eastern Anatolia, particularly its tax collection practices, as part of the larger context of the “Armenian Question.” Perhaps Ottoman economic and financial historians have been reluctant to consider tax collection as politics. In any case, key linkages between the tax regime and the social and political catastrophe it helped to create have been missed. In this paper I establish a bridge between social and political history and fiscal history. I analyze tax collection as everyday politics to offer a new window into the political disturbances in the empire's six provinces populated mostly by Armenians and Kurds. The study of the Ottoman tax system as an instance of state administrative practices at the quotidian level, rather than as merely a legal and institutional apparatus, illuminates the complicated realities of the late Ottoman state and society, and the “Armenian Question.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 770 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 İnalcık, Halil, “Application of the Tanzimat and Its Social Effects,” Archivum Ottomanicum 5 (1973): 99–127Google Scholar. Uzun, Ahmet, Tanzimat ve Sosyal Direnişler (İstanbul: Eren Yayınları, 2002)Google Scholar; Çakır, Coşkun, Tanzimat Dönemi Osmanlı Maliyesi (İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2001)Google Scholar; Şener, Abdüllatif, Tanzimat Dönemi Osmanlı Vergi Sistemi (İstanbul: İşaret Yayınları, 1990)Google Scholar.

2 Quataert, Donald, “The Massacres of Ottoman Armenians and the Writing of Ottoman History,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 37, 2 (2006): 249–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Abrams, Philip, “Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State,” Journal of Historical Sociology 1, 1 (1988): 58–89, 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ibid., 125.

5 Mitchell, Timothy, “Society, Economy, and the State Effect,” in Steinmetz, George, ed., State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999), 76–97, 89Google Scholar.

6 Philip Abrams, “Notes on the Difficulty,” 124.

7 Timothy Mitchell, “Society, Economy,” 76–97, 84.

8 See articles in Krohn-Hansen, Christian and Nustad, Knut G., eds., State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

9 Harvey, Penelope, “The Materiality of State Effects: An Ethnography of a Road in the Peruvian Andes,” in Krohn-Hansen, Christian and Nustad, Knut G., eds., State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, 2005), 123–41Google Scholar.

10 Neumann, Iver B., “‘A Speech that the Entire Ministry may Stand For’: On Generating State Voice,” in Krohn-Hansen, Christian and Nustad, Knut G., eds., State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, 2005), 195–211Google Scholar.

11 Bauman, Zygmunt, “The Fate of Humanity in the Post-Trinitarian World,” International Political Science Review 25, 3 (2002): 281–96Google Scholar; quoted in Alonso, Ana M., “Sovereignty, the Spatial Politics of Security, and Gender: Looking North and South from the US-Mexico Border,” in Krohn-Hansen, Christian and Nustad, Knut G., eds., State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, 2005), 27–52, 31Google Scholar.

12 Aydın, Veli, “Osmanlı Maliyesinde Bir İç Borçlanma Örneği Olarak Esham Uygulaması,” in Türkler (Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002), 340–50Google Scholar. Akyıldız, Ali, Para Pul Oldu: Osmanlı'da Kağıt Para, Maliye ve Toplum (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2003)Google Scholar.

13 Cezar, Yavuz, Osmanlı Maliyesinde Bunalım ve Değişim Dönemi, XVII: Yüzyıldan Tanzimat'a Malî Tarih (İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık, 1986)Google Scholar.

14 Karaman, K. Kıvanç and Pamuk, Şevket, “Ottoman State Finances in European Perspective, 1500–1914,” Journal of Economic History 70, 3 (2010): 593–629, 594CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Engin Deniz Akarlı, “The Problems of External Pressures, Power Struggles, and Budgetary Deficits in Ottoman Politics under Abdülhamid II (1876–1909): Origins and Solutions” (PhD diss., Princeton University, 1976), 190–91.

16 Ibid., 182.

17 Ibid., 155.

18 On income tax, see Özbek, Nadir, “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Gelir Vergisi: 1903–1907 Tarihli Vergi-i Şahsi Uygulaması,” Tarih ve Toplum Yeni Yaklaşımlar 10 (2010): 43–80Google Scholar.

19 FO, 424/106, no. 151, encl. 1, “Report on the Population, Industries, Trade, Commerce, Agriculture, Public Works, Land Tenure, and Government of City and Province of Angora, Anatolia, by Vice-Consul Gatheral, Constantinople,” 27 Oct. 1879: 306–27. From 1844 to 1914 the exchange rate of the British pound was 110 Ottoman piastres. For the exchange rates, see Pamuk, Şevket, A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 191Google Scholar.

20 FO, 424/210, no. 77, encl. 3, “Taxes Paid by Certain Five Villages in the District of Diarbekir. Diarbekir,” 28 Aug. 1906: 97.

21 For a detailed history of the Ottoman gendarmerie, see Özbek, Nadir, “Policing the Countryside: Gendarmes of the Late-Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Empire (1876–1908),” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40, 1 (2008): 47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Özbek, Nadir, “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda İç Güvenlik, Siyaset ve Devlet, 1876–1909,” Türklük Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16 (2004): 59–95Google Scholar; Ali Sönmez, “Zaptiye Teşkilâtının Kuruluşu ve Gelişimi” (PhD diss., Ankara Üniversitesi, 2005).

22 BOA, Nizamat-ı İdare-i Zabtiye/, 1286.03.11/21 Haziran 1869.

23 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 262/100, 1279.11.21 (10 Mayıs 1863).

24 For the popular unrest resulting from issues related to taxation, see Halil İnalcık, “Application of the Tanzimat; and Ahmet Uzun, Tanzimat ve Sosyal.

25 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 277/15, 1280.04.03 (17 Eylül 1863). For the details of this experiment in Niş, see Özbek, Nadir, “Abdülhamid Rejimi, Vergi Tahsildarlığı ve Siyaset, 1876–1908,” Doğu Batı 52 (2010): 159–97Google Scholar.

26 BOA, Vilayet Nizamnâmesi/, 1280.06.07/26 Teşrin-i Evvel 1280/7 Kasım 1864.

27 BOA, İ.MVL, 559/25160, 1283.05.09 (19 Eylül 1866); BOA, İ.MVL, 560/25166, 1283.05.09 (19 Eylül 1866). For example, Cevdet Pasha prepared a regulation defining the functions and organizational schema of the tax collecting apparatus.

28 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 277/15, 1280.04.03 (17 Eylül 1863).

29 BOA, Emval-i Miriye Tahsilatı İçin İstihdam Olunacak Tahsildarların Sıfat ve Hareketleri ve Vezaif-i Memuriyetleri Hakkında Talimattır/, 1288.02.05/26 Nisan 1871.

30 BOA, Tahsil-i Emval-i Miriye Hakkında Talimat/, 1292.03.25/1 Mayıs 1875.

31 BOA, Emval-i Miriye Tahsilatı İçin İstihdam Olunacak Tahsildarların Sıfat ve Hareketleri ve Vezaif-i Memuriyetleri Hakkında Talimattır/, 1288.02.05/26 Nisan 1871; BOA, Tahsil-i Emval-i Miriye Hakkında Talimat/, 1292.03.25/1 Mayıs 1875; BOA, Tahsil-i Emval Nizamnâmesi/, 1296.11.25/10 Kasım 1879; BOA, Tahsil-i Emval Nizamnamesi/, 1304.01.19/6 Teşrin-i Evvel 1302/18 Ekim 1886; BOA, Tahsil-i Emval Nizamnamesi/, 1311.08.01/26 Kanun-i Sani 1311/7 Şubat 1894; BOA, Tahsil-i Emval Nizamnamesi/, 1319.12.08/05 Mart 1318/18 Mart 1902.

32 For a study on these regulations, see Özbek, “Abdülhamid Rejimi,” 159–97.

33 For details of the administrative reform program in the eastern provinces, see Şaşmaz, Musa, British Policy and the Application of Reforms for the Armenians in Eastern Anatolia (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 2000)Google Scholar; Karaca, Ali, Anadolu Islahatı ve Ahmet Şakir Paşa, 1838–1899 (İstanbul: Eren Yayıncılık, 1993)Google Scholar.

34 For the text of the reform scheme, see Ali Karaca, Anadolu Islahatı, 217–22.

35 BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 8/62, 1314.11.18 (20 Nisan 1897); BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 12/29, 1315.02.24 (25 Temmuz 1897).

36 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 679/25, 1314.06.07 (13 Kasım 1896); BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 4/41, 1314.07.08 (13 Aralık 1896).

37 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 679/25, 1314.06.07 (13 Kasım 1896).

38 Ibid.

39 Ibid.

40 For a detailed discussion of the provinces on the Iranian border, see Sabri Ateş, “Empires at the Margin: Towards a History of the Ottoman-Iranian Borderland and the Borderland Peoples, 1843–1881” (PhD diss., New York University, 2006).

41 BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 7/42, 1314.09.25 (27 Şubat 1897); BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 681/3, 1314.09.30 (4 Mart 1897).

42 The situation was no different in the provinces of Baghdad, Mosul, and Basra, where Arab tribal forces had complete control over local politics. For details on these provinces, see Özbek, Nadir, “Abdülhamid Rejimi, Vergi Tahsildarlığı ve Siyaset, 1876–1908,” Doğu Batı 52 (2010): 159–97Google Scholar.

43 Engin Deniz Akarlı, “The Problems of External Pressures, Power Struggles, and Budgetary Deficits in Ottoman Politics under Abdülhamid II (1876–1909): Origins and Solutions” (PhD diss., Princeton University, 1976), 164–68.

44 Ali Karaca, Anadolu Islahatı, 112–13.

45 I borrow the phrase from Yani Kotsonis; see his “‘Face-to-Face’: The State, the Individual, and the Citizen in Russian Taxation,” Slavic Review 63, 2 (2004): 221–46Google Scholar.

46 The Hamidiye regiments were conceived as an irregular force on the Russian Cossack model. For more on this, see Deringil, Selim, “From Ottoman to Turk: Self-Image and Social Engineering in Turkey,” in Gladney, Dru C., ed., Making Majorities: Constituting the Nation in Japan, Korea, China, Malaysia, Fiji, Turkey, and the United States (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 217–26Google Scholar. See also, Klein, Janet, Margins of Empire: Kurdish Militias in the Ottoman Tribal Zone (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 621/1, 1315.09.15 (7 Şubat 1898).

48 BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 37/23, 1320.01.14 (23 Nisan 1902).

49 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 659/1, 1314.04.11 (19 Eylül 1896).

50 BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 6/117, 1314.09.06 (8 Şubat 1897); BOA, DH.TMIK.S, 7/1, 1314.09.07 (9 Şubat 1897).

51 For a detailed study of correspondences between the central government and the provincial governors, particularly the latter's tendency to misinform the center as regards local social and political issues, see Abdülhamit Kırmızı, Abdülhamid'in Valileri: Osmanlı Vilayet İdaresi, 1895–1908 (İstanbul: Klasik, 2007).

52 FO, 424/106, no. 13, encl. 10, report by Captain Clayton on reforms in Van, Van, 29 Nov. 1879: 34–40, 38; FO, 424/210, no. 77, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Shipley to Sir N. O'Conor, Diarbekir, 28 Aug. 1906: 94–95.

53 Ibid.

54 FO, 424/106, no. 78, encl. 1, Major Trotter to the Marquis of Salisbury, Diarbekir, 7 Jan. 1880: 167–70.

55 FO, 424/202, no. 41, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Satow to Sir N. O'Conor, Van, 10 June 1901: 39–41.

56 FO, 424/106, no. 194, encl. 2, Lt. Chermside to Sir A. H. Layard, Kharput, 5 Apr. 1880: 419–25, 422.

57 FO, 424/106, no. 246, encl. 1, memo by Lt.-Col. Wilson on Anatolia and necessary reforms, Therapia, 16 June 1880: 498–510, 506.

58 FO, 424/91, no. 171, encl. 1, Lt. Chermside to Sir A. H. Layard. Tarsus, 26 Nov. 1879: 213–19, 218.

59 FO, 424/106, no. 89, encl. 9, Lt.-Col. Wilson to Sir A. H. Layard. Sivas, 7 Feb. 1880: 191–92; FO, 424/106, no. 100, encl. 1, “Report on General Administration of the Vilayet of Kastamuni,” 17 Dec. 1879: 209–21, 215; FO, 424/106, no. 146, encl. 11, Lt. Chermside to Lt.-Col. Wilson. Diarbekir, 9 Feb. 1880: 297–300.

60 FO, 424/106, no. 151, encl. 1, “Report on the Population,” 321.

61 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 646/3, 1313.04.19 (9 Ekim 1895).

62 Kieser, Hans-Lukas, Iskalanmış Barış: Doğu Vilayetleri'nde Misyonerlik, Etnik Kimlik ve Devlet, 1839–1938, Dirim, Atilla, trans. (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2005), 211–12Google Scholar.

63 BOA, Y.PRK.UM, 48/51, 1317.06.18 (24 Ekim 1899).

64 FO, 424/106, no. 146, encl. 2, Captain Stewart to Sir A. H. Layard, Adalia, 8 Feb. 1880: 286–88.

65 FO, 424/203, no. 90, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Freeman to Sir N. O'Conor, Bitlis, 7 June 1902: 93–94.

66 The conversion of Armenians could also be considered in this context. See Deringil, Selim, “‘The Armenian Question Is Finally Closed’: Mass Conversions of Armenians in Anatolia during the Hamidian Massacres of 1895–1897,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51, 2 (2009): 344–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Astourian, Stephen H., “The Silence of the Land: Agrarian Relations, Ethnicity, and Power,” in Suny, Ronald Grigor, Göçek, Fatma Müge, and Naimark, Norman M., eds., A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Klein, Margins of Empire, ch. 4, “The Hamidiye and the ‘Agrarian Question,’” 128–69.

68 FO, 424/203, no. 90, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Freeman to Sir N. O'Conor, Bitlis, June 7, 1902: 93–94.

69 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 659/1, 1314.04.11 (19 Eylül 1896).

70 BOA, A.MKT.MHM, 673/39, 1325.07.23 (1 Eylül 1907).

71 FO, 424/91, no. 171, encl. 1, Lt. Chermside to Sir A. H. Layard 1. Tarsus, Nov. 26, 1879: 213–19, 218.

72 FO, 424/91, no. 171, encl. 2, Lt. Chermside to Sir A. H. Layard, 2. Adana, 29 Nov. 1879: 219–24, 222.

73 Astourian, “Silence of the Land,” 60.

74 Walker, Christopher J., Armenia: The Survival of a Nation (London: Routledge, 1991), 137Google Scholar.

75 Ibid., 130.

76 FO, 424/203, no. 11, encl. 1, Consul Lamb to Sir N. O'Conor. Erzeroum, 31 Dec. 1901: 12–13, 12.

77 FO, 424/203, no. 141, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Tyrrell to Sir N. O'Conor, Van, 7 Oct. 1902: 136–45, 141.

78 Ibid., 144.

79 FO, 424/203, no. 20, encl. 1, Report by Vice-Consul Anderson on the Vilayet of Diarbekir. Diarbekir, December quarter, 1901: 38.

80 FO, 424/206, no. 218, encl. 1, Consul Barnham to Sir N. O'Conor, Ourfa, 1 Oct. 1904: 206–9, 207.

81 FO, 424/206, no. 39, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Heathcote to Sir N. O'Conor, Bitlis, 19 Mar. 1904: 35–36, 35.

82 FO, 424/203, no. 141, encl. 1, Vice-Consul Tyrrell to Sir N. O'Conor, Van, 7 Oct. 1902: 136–45, 136.

83 FO, 424/200, no. 17, encl. 1, Consul Longworth to Sir N. O'Conor, Trebizond, 1 Feb. 1900: 14–17, 14.

84 FO, 424/206, no. 173, encl. 2, Sir N. O'Conor to Vice-Consul Tyrrelli, Therapia, 30 Aug. 1904: 161.

85 Libaridian, Gerard J., “What Was Revolutionary about Armenian Revolutionary Parties in the Ottoman Empire?” in Suny, Ronald Grigor, Göçek, Fatma Müge, and Naimark, Norman M., eds., A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 82–112, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

86 Ibid., 100.

87 Ibid., 105.

88 Philip Abrams, “Notes on the Difficulty,” 125.

89 On the relationship between order and chaos, see Zygmunt Bauman, “Fate of Humanity,” quoted in Alonso, “Sovereignty,” 31.