Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:40:18.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems in Analysing the Agrarian Transition in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

David E. Goodman  and
Michael R. Redclift
David E. Goodman
Affiliation:
University of London
Michael R. Redclift
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CSSH Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 784 - 791
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berardi, Ggi M. and Geisler, Charles C., eds. 1984. The Social Consequences and Challenges of New Agricultural Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, D. 1983. “French Agriculture: Trends, Outlook and Policies.” Food Policy, 8:4,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlan, M. 1986. “Farmers' Wives in Protest: A Theatre of Contradiction.” Sociologia Ruralis, 26:3–4, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Ian R. 1985. Agriculture under the Common Agricultural Policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. B. 1983. “Future Directions for Agricultural Policy.” American Journal of Agrarian Economics, 66:2, 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttel, F. 1983. “Beyond the Family Farm,” in Technology and Rural Social Changes, Summers, Gene F., ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Clout, Hugh D. 1984. A Rural Policy for the EEC? London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Frank, W. 1983. “Part-Time Farming, Underemployment and Double Activity in the EEC.” Sociologia Ruralis, 23:1, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S. H. 1969. The European Peasantry. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. H. 1986. “Peasants, the Environment and the Common Agricultural Policy,” in Slater, F., ed. People and Environments, Collins Educational.Google Scholar
Gasson, R. 1986. “Part-time Farming: Strategy for Survival?” Sociologia Ruralis, 26:3–4, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, David E., AND Redclift, Michael R. 1981. From Peasant to Proletarian: Capitalist Development and Agrarian Transition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodman, David E., 1986. “Capitalism, Petty Commodity Production and the Farm Enterprise,” in Cox, G., Lowe, P., and Winter, M., eds. Agriculture: People and Policies, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Goodman, David E., eds. 1988. The International Farm Crisis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, David E.; Sorj, Bernardo; and Wilkinson, John. 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: The Industrialisation of Agriculture. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mendras, Henri. 1970. The Vanishing Peasant. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polopolos, L. 1984. “Agricultural Economics beyond the Farm Gate,” in US Senate, Farm Policy Perspectives. Washington DC: US Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry.Google Scholar
Redclift, Michael R. 1986. “Survival Strategies in Rural Europe: Continuity and Change.” Sociologia Ruralis, 26:3–4, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Frances. 1986. “The New Proletarians: Third World Reality and First World Categories.” Comparative Studies in Society and history, 28:2, 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, J. F. 1983. “Dutch Agriculture Edging into the Eighties.” European Review of Agricultural Economics, 10:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar