Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:07:36.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Families and Demographic Behaviour: Some Latin American Analogies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Eduardo Archetti
Eduardo Archetti
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article examines some factors related to problems of demographic behaviour. To illustrate my arguments I will use as examples two case studies, one carried out in Argentina and the other in Ecuador. The original research was not cast in strictly demographic terms and therefore many of the relevant data cannot be presented in a precise way. However, many of my empirical findings and qualitative observations can be used in discussing problems concerning demographic behaviour.

Type
Demography and Dowry: Family and Land
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 251 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anuario Geográfico Argentino. 1941. Buenos Aires: Comité Nacional de Geografia.Google Scholar
Archetti, Eduardo P. 1977. “El proceso de capitalization de campesinos argentinos,” Caravelle, 28: 123–40.Google Scholar
Archetti, Eduardo P. 1980. “Haciendas and Peasants: The Process of Agrarian Change in Ecuador.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Rural Economy and Society in Contemporary Eastern Europe, Bellagio, Italy.Google Scholar
Archetti, Eduardo P., AND Stløen, Kristi Anne. 1975. Explotacion familiar y acumulación de capital en el campo argentino. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Archetti, Eduardo P. 1978. “Economia doméstica, estrategias de herencia y acumulación de capital:la situación de la mujer en el norte de Santa Fe, Argentina.” América Indígene, 38:2, 384–403.Google Scholar
Aries, Philippe. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Berkner, Lutz K. 1972. “The Stem Family and the Developmental Cycle of the Peasant Household: An Eighteenth-Century Austrian Example.” American Historical Review, 77:2, 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1963. “The Attitude of the Algerian Peasant toward Time,” in Mediterranean Countrymen, Rivers, Julian Pitt, ed. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Algerie 60: structures économiques et structures temporelles. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Braun, Rudolf. 1966. “The Impact of Cottage Industry on an Agricultural Population,” in The Rise of Capitalism, Landes, David S., ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. D. 1972. Population, Economy and Society in Pre-industrial England. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coale, A. J., AND Hoover, E. M. 1958. Population Growth and Economic Development in Low-Income Countries: A Case Study of India's Prospects. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cortes Conde, Roberto, AND Gallo, Ezequiel. 1967. La formacion de la Argentina moderna. Buenos Aires: Paidos.Google Scholar
De Janvry, Alain, AND Garramon, Carlos. 1977. “The Dynamics of Rural Poverty in Latin America.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 4:3, 206–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Michael, ed. 1969. Population in Industrialization. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Drake, Michael, ed. 1972. “Fertility Controls in Pre-industrial Norway,” in Population and Social Change, Glass, D. V. and Revelle, R., eds. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1972. Homo Hierarchicus. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1977. Homo aequalis. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Epstein, T. Scarlett. 1977. “From ‘Accommodation’ to ‘Intervention’: Socio-economic Heterogeneity and Demographic Patterns,” in The Feasibility of Fertility Planning, Epstein, T. Scarlett and Jackson, Darrell, eds. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfram. 1973. “Rural Industrialization and Population Change.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15:2, 158–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandrin, Jean-Louis. 1973. L'attitude à l'égard du petit enfant et les conduits sexualles dans la civilisation occidentale: structures anciennes et evolution.” Annates de démographie historique, 143–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giberti, Horacio. 1970. Historia económica de la ganaderia argentina. Buenos Aires: Solar/Hachette.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, D. V., AND Eversley, D. E. C. 1965. Population in Hiṡtory. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Glass, D. V., and Revelle, R., eds. 1972. Population and Social Change. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Habbakuk, H. J. 1955. “Family Structure and Economic Change in Nineteenth-Century Europe.” Journal of Economic History, 53: 607–18.Google Scholar
Jones, E. L. 1968. “The Agricultural Origins of Industry.” Past and Present, no. 40, 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. L., and Mingay, G. E., eds. 1967. Land, Labor and Population in the Industrial Revolution. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1965. The World We Have Lost. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1970. “The Comparative History of the Household and Family.” Journal of Social History, 4:2, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter, and Wall, R., eds. 1972. Household and Family in Past Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, David. 1977. Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan. 1976. Resources and Population: A Study of the Gurungs of Nepal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan. 1978a. “Modes of Reproduction.” Journal of Development Studies, 14:4, 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan. 1978b. The Origins of British Individualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Medick, Hans. 1976. “The Proto-industrial Family Economy: The Structural Function of Household and Family during the Transition from Peasant Society to Industrial Capitalism.” Social History, 1:3, 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendels, Franklin. 1972. “Proto-industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.” Journal of Economic History, 32:1, 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, John T. 1972. “Intellectual and Demographic History” in Population and Social Change, Glass, D. V. and Revelle, R., eds. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Perusini, G. 1961. Vita del popolo in Friuli, patti agrari e consuetudini tradizionali. Florence: n.p.Google Scholar
Prost, Brigitte. 1974. Le Frioul-région d'qffrontements. Thése de doctorat, Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
Scobie, James R. 1968. Revolutión en las Pampas: Historia social del trigo argentino. Buenos Aires: Solar/Hachette.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward. 1977. The Making of the Modern Family. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Taylor, Carl C. 1948. Rural Life in Argentina. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1972. “Anthropology and the Discipline of Historical Context.” Midland History, 2:1, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warman, Arturo. 1978. “Peasant Production and Population.” Paper presented at the Symposium on the Social Anthropology of Peasantry, 19–21 12, Lucknow, India.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Gerth, H. and Mills, C. W., eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. 1969. Population and History. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar