Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T13:05:28.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Was Onan's Crime?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Leonard Mars
Leonard Mars
Affiliation:
University College of Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article has had a long incubation. Three stimuli operating in different ways over a period of time account for its genesis: my exposure to anthropological writings on the Bible, my field work research in Israel, and my teaching of social anthropology in Swansea. Education in England, both secular and religious (by the latter I mean attendance at Hebrew classes outside of school from age seven to thirteen, culminating in my bar mitzvah), had exposed me to both the Old and New Testaments but had failed to raise any enthusiasm or interest on my part. Only when I began to study anthropology as an undergraduate did I begin to consider the biblical stories that I had heard in my childhood and youth. One of my first, serendipitous discoveries was Isaac Schapera's paper, “The Sin of Cain” (1955), in which he examines the first case of fratricide recorded in the Bible and postulates why Cain was not punished in the usual manner for engaging in homicide. He argues that precisely because Cain murdered his brother he evaded the usual penalty: he placed his group in the dilemma of compounding the loss of one of its members if it were to practise retaliation, nor could it agree to accept compensation since it would be in the position of accepting from its members and then paying out again to the same members. Into this impasse God enters, truly a deus ex machina, to resolve the problem. Schapera supports his argument by examples derived from ethnographic studies that recorded similar problems of homicide, especially fratricide.

Type
Law and Religion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 429 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. G. “Some Aspects of the Levirate,” in The Character of Kinship, Goody, J., ed. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. M. 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. A. 1975. “Some Problems in Genesis XXXVIII.” Vetus Testamentum, 25: fasc. 3, 338–61.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. A.1976. “An Examination of a Recent Structuralist Interpretation of Genesis XXXVIII.” Vetus Testamentum, 26; fasc. 1, 79–98.Google Scholar
Emerton, J. A.1979. “Judah and Tamar.” Vetus Testamentum, 29; fasc. 4, 403–15.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. 1968. Birth Control in Jewish Law. London: London University Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. 1949. The Web of Kinship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M.1974. “The First Born.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15:2, 81–104.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1918. Folk-Lore in the Old Testament. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leach, E. R. 1969. Genesis as Myth and Other Essays. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. 1975. History—Remembered, Recovered, Invented. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. 1926. Israel: Its Life and Culture. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J. 1977. The Fate of Shechem or the Politics of Sex. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, D. F. 1975. “North and South in the book of Genesis,” in Studies in Social Anthropology, Beattie, J. H. M. and Lienhardt, R. G.. eds. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potok, C. 1976. In the Beginning. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1950. African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson-Smith, W. 1889. The Religion of the Semites. London: A.&C. Black.Google Scholar
Rogerson, J. W. 1978. Anthropology and the Old Testament. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1955. “The Sin of Cain.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 85: pt. 1 (01–06, 33–43.Google Scholar