Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:20:40.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gorenstein rings through face rings of manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Isabella Novik
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Box 354350, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4350, USA (email: novik@math.washington.edu)
Ed Swartz
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4201, USA (email: ebs22@cornell.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The face ring of a homology manifold (without boundary) modulo a generic system of parameters is studied. Its socle is computed and it is verified that a particular quotient of this ring is Gorenstein. This fact is used to prove that the algebraic g-conjecture for spheres implies all enumerative consequences of its far-reaching generalization (due to Kalai) to manifolds. A special case of Kalai’s conjecture is established for homology manifolds that have a codimension-two face whose link contains many vertices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation Compositio Mathematica 2009

References

[1]Billera, L. and Lee, C., A proof of the sufficiency of McMullen’s conditions for f-vectors of simplical convex polytopes, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 31 (1981), 237255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Björner, A. and Kalai, G., An extended Euler–Poincaré theorem, Acta Math. 161 (1988), 279303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Eisenbud, D., Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150 (Springer, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
[4]Gräbe, H.-G., The canonical module of a Stanley–Reisner ring, J. Algebra 86 (1984), 272281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kalai, G., Rigidity and the lower bound theorem I, Invent. Math. 88 (1987), 125151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kalai, G., Algebraic shifting, in Computational commutative algebra and combinatorics, Osaka, 1999 (Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2002), 121163.Google Scholar
[7]Klee, V., A combinatorial analogue of Poincaré’s duality theorem, Canad. J. Math. 16 (1964), 517531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Murai, S., Algebraic shifting of cyclic polytopes and stacked polytopes, Discrete Math. 307 (2007), 17071721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Murai, S., Algebraic shifting of strongly edge decomposable spheres, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, to appear.Google Scholar
[10]Nevo, E., Algebraic shifting and f-vector theory, PhD thesis, Hebrew University (2007).Google Scholar
[11]Novik, I., Upper bound theorems for homology manifolds, Israel J. Math. 108 (1998), 4582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Novik, I. and Swartz, E., Socles of Buchsbaum modules, complexes and posets, Preprint (2007), arXiv:0711.0783.Google Scholar
[13]Schenzel, P., On the number of faces of simplicial complexes and the purity of Frobenius, Math. Z. 178 (1981), 125142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Stanley, R., The number of faces of a simplicial convex polytope, Adv. Math. 35 (1980), 236238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Stanley, R., Combinatorics and commutative algebra (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1996).Google Scholar
[16]Swartz, E., Face enumeration—from spheres to manifolds, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 11 (2009), 449485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar