Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:58:15.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher-rank Bohr sets and multiplicative diophantine approximation

Part of: Geometry of numbers Discrete geometry Diophantine approximation, transcendental number theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2019

Sam Chow  and
Niclas Technau
Sam Chow
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Andrew Wiles Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK email sam.chow@maths.ox.ac.uk
Niclas Technau
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK email niclas.technau@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gallagher’s theorem is a sharpening and extension of the Littlewood conjecture that holds for almost all tuples of real numbers. We provide a fibre refinement, solving a problem posed by Beresnevich, Haynes and Velani in 2015. Hitherto, this was only known on the plane, as previous approaches relied heavily on the theory of continued fractions. Using reduced successive minima in lieu of continued fractions, we develop the structural theory of Bohr sets of arbitrary rank, in the context of diophantine approximation. In addition, we generalise the theory and result to the inhomogeneous setting. To deal with this inhomogeneity, we employ diophantine transference inequalities in lieu of the three distance theorem.

Keywords

metric diophantine approximationgeometry of numbersadditive combinatorics

MSC classification

Primary: 11J83: Metric theory 11J20: Inhomogeneous linear forms 11H06: Lattices and convex bodies 52C07: Lattices and convex bodies in $n$ dimensions
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 155 , Issue 11 , November 2019 , pp. 2214 - 2233
Copyright
© The Authors 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aistleitner, C., A note on the Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture with slow divergence , Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 46 (2014), 164–168.Google Scholar
Aistleitner, C., Lachmann, T., Munsch, M., Technau, N. and Zafeiropoulos, A., The Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture with extra divergence, Adv. Math., to appear. Preprint (2018), arXiv:1803.05703.Google Scholar
Barroero, F. and Widmer, M., Counting lattice points and o-minimal structures , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2014 (2013), 4932–4957.Google Scholar
Beresnevich, V., Harman, G., Haynes, A. and Velani, S., The Duffin-Schaeffer conjecture with extra divergence II , Math. Z. 275 (2013), 127–133.Google Scholar
Beresnevich, V., Haynes, A. and Velani, S., Sums of reciprocals of fractional parts and multiplicative Diophantine approximation , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
Beresnevich, V., Ramírez, F. and Velani, S., Metric Diophantine Approximation: some aspects of recent work , in Dynamics and analytic number theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 437 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016), 1–95.Google Scholar
Beresnevich, V. and Velani, S., An inhomogeneous transference principle and Diophantine approximation , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 101 (2010), 821–851.Google Scholar
Beresnevich, V. and Velani, S., A note on three problems in metric Diophantine approximation , in Recent trends in ergodic theory and dynamical systems, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 631 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015), 211–229.Google Scholar
Bugeaud, Y., Multiplicative Diophantine approximation , in Dynamical systems and Diophantine approximation, Séminaires et Congrès, vol. 19 (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2009), 105–125.Google Scholar
Bugeaud, Y. and Laurent, M., On exponents of homogeneous and inhomogeneous Diophantine approximation , Mosc. Math. J. 5 (2005), 747–766.Google Scholar
Bugeaud, Y. and Laurent, M., On transfer inequalities in Diophantine approximation, II , Math. Z. 265 (2010), 249–262.Google Scholar
Chow, S., Bohr sets and multiplicative diophantine approximation , Duke Math. J. 167 (2018), 1623–1642.Google Scholar
Chow, S., Ghosh, A., Guan, L., Marnat, A. and Simmons, D., Diophantine transference inequalities: weighted, inhomogeneous, and intermediate exponents , Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), to appear.Google Scholar
Davenport, H., On a principle of Lipschitz , J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1 (1951), 179–183.Google Scholar
Duffin, R. J. and Schaeffer, A. C., Khintchine’s problem in metric Diophantine approximation , Duke Math. J. 8 (1941), 243–255.Google Scholar
Evertse, J.-H., Mahler’s work on the geometry of numbers , in The legacy of Kurt Mahler: a mathematical selecta, Documenta Mathematica, eds Baake, M., Bugeaud, Y. and Coons, M.; to appear.Google Scholar
Fregoli, R., Sums of reciprocals of fractional parts , Int. J. Number Theory 15 (2019), 789–797.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. X., Approximation by reduced fractions , J. Math. Soc. Japan 13 (1961), 342–345.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. X., Metric simultaneous diophantine approximation , J. Lond. Math. Soc. 37 (1962), 387–390.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. and Marnat, A., On Diophantine transference principles , Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 166 (2019), 415–431.Google Scholar
Harman, G., Metric number theory, London Mathematical Society Monographs (N.S.), vol. 18 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
Haynes, A., Pollington, A. and Velani, S., The Duffin-Schaeffer Conjecture with extra divergence , Math. Ann. 353 (2012), 259–273.Google Scholar
Hussain, M. and Simmons, D., The Hausdorff measure version of Gallagher’s theorem — closing the gap and beyond , J. Number Theory 186 (2018), 211–225.Google Scholar
Khintchine, A. Ya., Über eine Klasse linearer diophantischer Approximationen , Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 50 (1926), 170–195.Google Scholar
Lê, T.-H. and Vaaler, J., Sums of products of fractional parts , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 111 (2015), 561–590.Google Scholar
Ramírez, F., Counterexamples, covering systems, and zero-one laws for inhomogeneous approximation , Int. J. Number Theory 13 (2017), 633–654.Google Scholar
Ramírez, F., Khintchine’s theorem with random fractions, Mathematika, to appear. Preprint (2017), arXiv:1708.02874.Google Scholar
Siegel, C. L., Lectures on the geometry of numbers (Springer, Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar
Steele, J. M., The Cauchy–Schwarz master class: an introduction to the art of mathematical inequalities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).Google Scholar
Tao, T., Continued fractions, Bohr sets, and the Littlewood conjecture, https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2012/01/03/continued-fractions-bohr-sets-and-the-littlewood-conjecture/.Google Scholar
Tao, T. and Vu, V., Additive combinatorics, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 105 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Tao, T. and Vu, V., John-type theorems for generalized arithmetic progressions and iterated sumsets , Adv. Math. 219 (2008), 428–449.Google Scholar
Thunder, J. L., The number of solutions of bounded height to a system of linear equations , J. Number Theory 43 (1993), 228–250.Google Scholar
Yu, H., A Fourier analytic approach to inhomogeneous Diophantine approximation , Acta Arith., to appear.Google Scholar