Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:20:10.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogeneity of cohomology classes associated with Koszul matrix factorizations

Part of: Homological methods Quantum field theory; related classical field theories Local theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2016

Alexander Polishchuk
Alexander Polishchuk*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA email apolish@uoregon.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this work we prove the so-called dimension property for the cohomological field theory associated with a homogeneous polynomial $W$ with an isolated singularity, in the algebraic framework of [A. Polishchuk and A. Vaintrob, Matrix factorizations and cohomological field theories, J. Reine Angew. Math. 714 (2016), 1–122]. This amounts to showing that some cohomology classes on the Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces of stable curves, constructed using Fourier–Mukai-type functors associated with matrix factorizations, live in prescribed dimension. The proof is based on a homogeneity result established in [A. Polishchuk and A. Vaintrob, Algebraic construction of Witten’s top Chern class, in Advances in algebraic geometry motivated by physics (Lowell, MA, 2000) (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001), 229–249] for certain characteristic classes of Koszul matrix factorizations of $0$ . To reduce to this result, we use the theory of Fourier–Mukai-type functors involving matrix factorizations and the natural rational lattices in the relevant Hochschild homology spaces, as well as a version of Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations for Hochschild homology of matrix factorizations. Our approach also gives a proof of the dimension property for the cohomological field theories associated with some quasihomogeneous polynomials with an isolated singularity.

Keywords

matrix factorizationFan–Jarvis–Ruan–Witten theoryHochschild homology

MSC classification

Primary: 81T70: Quantization in field theory; cohomological methods
Secondary: 14B05: Singularities 16E40: (Co)homology of rings and algebras (e.g. Hochschild, cyclic, dihedral, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 152 , Issue 10 , October 2016 , pp. 2071 - 2112
Copyright
© The Author 2016 

References

Atiyah, M., Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (1957), 181–207.Google Scholar
Ballard, M., Deliu, D., Favero, D., Isik, M. U. and Katzarkov, L., Resolutions in factorization categories , Adv. Math. 295 (2016), 195–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, D., Lunts, V. A. and Schnürer, O. M., Geometricity for derived categories of algebraic stacks, Preprint (2016), arXiv:1601.04465.Google Scholar
Blanc, A., Topological K-theory of complex noncommutative spaces , Compos. Math. 152 (2016), 489–555.Google Scholar
Bondal, A. and Kapranov, M., Representable functors, Serre functors, and reconstructions , Math. USSR-Izv. 35 (1990), 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldararu, A., The Mukai pairing. II. The Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg isomorphism , Adv. Math. 194 (2005), 34–66.Google Scholar
Caldararu, A. and Tu, J., Curved A ∞ -algebras and Landau–Ginzburg models , New York J. Math. 19 (2013), 305–342.Google Scholar
Caldararu, A. and Willerton, S., The Mukai pairing I: a categorical approach , New York J. Math. 16 (2010), 61–98.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-L., Li, J. and Li, W.-P., Witten’s top Chern class via cosection localization , Invent. Math. 200 (2015), 1015–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiodo, A., Witten’s top Chern class via K-theory , J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), 681–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiodo, A., Iritani, H. and Ruan, Y., Landau–Ginzburg/Calabi–Yau correspondence, global mirror symmetry and Orlov equivalence , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 119 (2014), 127–216.Google Scholar
Chiodo, A. and Ruan, Y., LG/CY correspondence: the state space isomorphism , Adv. Math. 227 (2011), 2157–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligne, P., Hodge cycles on abelian varieties , in Hodge cycles, motives, and Shimura varieties, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 900 (Springer, Berlin–New York, 1982).Google Scholar
Dyckerhoff, T., Compact generators in categories of matrix factorizations , Duke Math. J. 159 (2011), 223–274.Google Scholar
Efimov, A. and Positselski, L., Coherent analogues of matrix factorizations and relative singularity categories , Algebra Number Theory 9 (2015), 1159–1292.Google Scholar
Fan, H., Jarvis, T. and Ruan, Y., The Witten equation, mirror symmetry and quantum singularity theory , Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), 1–106.Google Scholar
Guéré, J., A Landau–Ginzburg mirror theorem without concavity, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1307.5070.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Residues and duality, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 20 (Springer, Berlin, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontsevich, M., XI Solomon Lefschetz Memorial Lecture series: Hodge structures in non-commutative geometry (notes by Ernesto Lupercio) , in Non-commutative geometry in mathematics and physics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008), 1–21.Google Scholar
Kontsevich, M. and Manin, Yu. I., Gromov–Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry , Comm. Math. Phys. 164 (1994), 525–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kresch, A., On the geometry of Deligne–Mumford stacks , in Algebraic geometry (Seattle 2005), part 1 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009), 259–271.Google Scholar
Kresch, A. and Vistoli, A., On coverings of Deligne–Mumford stacks and surjectivity of the Brauer map , Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 36 (2004), 188–192.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, A., Hochschild homology and semiorthogonal decompositions, Preprint (2009), arXiv:0904.4330.Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, A., Base change for semiorthogonal decompositions , Compos. Math. 147 (2011), 852–876.Google Scholar
Lin, K. and Pomerleano, D., Global matrix factorizations , Math. Res. Lett. 20 (2013), 91–106.Google Scholar
Macrí, E. and Stellari, P., Infinitesimal derived Torelli theorem for K3 surfaces , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 17 (2009), 3190–3220.Google Scholar
Moore, W. F., Piepmeyer, G., Spiroff, S. and Walker, M. E., Hochster’s theta invariant and the Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations , Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 1692–1714.Google Scholar
Orlov, D., Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in Landau–Ginzburg models , Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 246 (2004), 227–248.Google Scholar
Orlov, D., Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated categories of singularities , in Algebra, arithmetic, and geometry: in honor of Yu. I. Manin, Vol. II (Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 2009), 503–531.Google Scholar
Orlov, D., Matrix factorizations for nonaffine LG-models , Math. Ann. 353 (2012), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlov, D., Smooth and proper noncommutative schemes and gluing of DG categories, Preprint (2014), arXiv:1402.7364.Google Scholar
Polishchuk, A., Lefschetz type formulas for dg-categories , Selecta Math. 20 (2014), 885–928.Google Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., Algebraic construction of Witten’s top Chern class , in Advances in algebraic geometry motivated by physics (Lowell, MA, 2000) (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., Matrix factorizations and singularity categories for stacks , Ann. Inst. Fourier 61 (2011), 2609–2642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., Chern characters and Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula for matrix factorizations , Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), 1863–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., Matrix factorizations and cohomological field theories , J. Reine Angew. Math. 714 (2016), 1–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadoss, A. C., The relative Riemann–Roch theorem from Hochschild homology , New York J. Math. 14 (2008), 643–717.Google Scholar
Shipman, I., A geometric approach to Orlov’s theorem , Compos. Math. 148 (2012), 1365–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklyarov, D., Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch-type theorem for DG algebras , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 106 (2013), 1–32.Google Scholar
Thomason, R. W., Algebraic K-theory of group scheme actions , in Algebraic topology and algebraic K-theory (Princeton, NJ, 1983) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987), 539–563.Google Scholar
Toën, B., The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory , Invent. Math. 167 (2007), 615–667.Google Scholar
Toën, B. and Vaquié, M., Moduli of objects in dg-categories , Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 40 (2007), 387–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R. O., Differential analysis on complex manifolds (Springer, New York, 1980).Google Scholar