Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:36:38.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Singular polynomials from orbit spaces

Part of: Representation theory of rings and algebras Symplectic geometry, contact geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2012

Misha Feigin  and
Alexey Silantyev
Misha Feigin
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, 15 University Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK (email: misha.feigin@glasgow.ac.uk)
Alexey Silantyev
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Tokyo 153-8914, Japan (email: aleksejsilantjev@gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the polynomial representation S(V*) of the rational Cherednik algebra Hc(W) associated to a finite Coxeter group W at constant parameter c. We show that for any degree d of W and m∈ℕ the space S(V*) contains a single copy of the reflection representation V of W spanned by the homogeneous singular polynomials of degree d−1+hm, where h is the Coxeter number of W; these polynomials generate an Hc (W) submodule with the parameter c=(d−1)/h+m. We express these singular polynomials through the Saito polynomials which are flat coordinates of the Saito metric on the orbit space V/W. We also show that this exhausts all the singular polynomials in the isotypic component of the reflection representation V for any constant parameter c.

Keywords

Dunkl operatorsrational Cherednik algebrapolynomial representationFrobenius manifoldSaito metric

MSC classification

Secondary: 16G99: None of the above, but in this section 53D45: Gromov-Witten invariants, quantum cohomology, Frobenius manifolds
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 148 , Issue 6 , November 2012 , pp. 1867 - 1879
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation Compositio Mathematica 2012

References

[Abr09]Abriani, D., Frobenius manifolds associated to Coxeter groups of type E 7 and E 8, Preprint (2009), arXiv:0910.5453.Google Scholar
[BP10]Balagovic, M. and Puranik, A., Irreducible representations of the rational Cherednik algebra associated to the Coxeter group H 3, Preprint (2010), arXiv:1004.2108.Google Scholar
[BEG03]Berest, Yu., Etingof, P. and Ginzburg, V., Finite-dimensional representations of rational Cherednik algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2003 (2003), 1053–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Chm06]Chmutova, T., Representations of the rational Cherednik algebras of dihedral type, J. Algebra 297 (2006), 542–565.Google Scholar
[CE03]Chmutova, T. and Etingof, P., On some representations of the rational Cherednik algebra, Represent. Theory 7 (2003), 641–650.Google Scholar
[Dub96]Dubrovin, B., Geometry of 2D topological field theories, in Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme, Italy 1993), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1620 (Springer, Berlin, 1996), 120–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Dub04]Dubrovin, B., On almost duality for Frobenius manifolds, in Geometry, topology, and mathematical physics, American Mathematical Society Translations Series 2, vol. 212 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004), 75–132.Google Scholar
[Dun89]Dunkl, C. F., Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311 (1989), 167–183.Google Scholar
[Dun98]Dunkl, C. F., Intertwining operators and polynomials associated with the symmetric group, Monatsh. Math. 126 (1998), 181–209.Google Scholar
[Dun03]Dunkl, C., Special functions and generating functions associated with reflection groups, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 153 (2003), 181–190.Google Scholar
[Dun04]Dunkl, C. F., Singular polynomials for the symmetric groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004 (2004), 3607–3635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Dun05]Dunkl, C. F., Singular polynomials and modules for the symmetric groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2005 (2005), 2409–2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[DJO94]Dunkl, C. F., de Jeu, M. F. E. and Opdam, E. M., Singular polynomials for finite reflection groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 346 (1994), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[DO03]Dunkl, C. F. and Opdam, E. M., Dunkl operators for complex reflection groups, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 86 (2003), 70–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[EYY93]Eguchi, T., Yamada, Y. and Yang, S.-K., Topological field theories and the period integrals, Modern Phys. Lett. A 8 (1993), 1627–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Eti07]Etingof, P., Calogero-Moser systems and representation theory, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics (European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[EG02]Etingof, P. and Ginzburg, V., Symplectic reflection algebras, Calogero-Moser space, and deformed Harish-Chandra homomorphism, Invent. Math. 147 (2002), 243–348.Google Scholar
[ES09]Etingof, P. and Stoica, E., Unitary representations of rational Cherednik algebras, Represent. Theory 13 (2009), 349–370 (with an appendix by S. Griffeth).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Gor03]Gordon, I., On the quotient ring by diagonal invariants, Invent. Math. 153 (2003), 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[GG09]Gordon, I. and Griffeth, S., Catalan numbers for complex reflection groups, Preprint (2009), arXiv:0912.1578.Google Scholar
[Hum90]Humphreys, J. E., Reflection groups and Coxeter groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KL11]Krivonos, S. and Lechtenfeld, O., Many-particle mechanics with D(2,1;α) superconformal symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 2011 (2011), 42.Google Scholar
[SYS80]Saito, K., Yano, T. and Sekiguchi, J., On a certain generator system of the ring of invariants of a finite reflection group, Comm. Algebra 8 (1980), 373–408.Google Scholar
[Tal10]Talamini, V., Flat bases of invariant polynomials and -matrices of E 7 and E 8, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010), 023520.Google Scholar