Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:58:50.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selling Germany in South-Eastern Europe: Economic Uncertainty, Commercial Information and the Leipzig Trade Fair 1920–40

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2011

STEPHEN GROSS
STEPHEN GROSS*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of California, Berkeley, 3229 Dwinelle Hall, Berkeley, CA 94707-2550; stephengross@berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the eve of the Second World War Germany dominated the exports and imports of south-eastern Europe. Yet the institutions that supported Germany's trade in the 1930s were formed during the previous decade. This article shows how one institution, the Leipzig trade fair, helped overcome many of the problems that had disrupted German commerce with Yugoslavia after the First World War. During a decade when German firms were only slowly returning to the region, the fair built an extensive trading network in south-eastern Europe that relayed economic news, found agents for German firms, and advertised for German products. By the 1930s the fair's representatives had become the backbone of Germany's trade network in south-eastern Europe.

Vendre l'allemagne dans l'europe du sud-est: incertitudes économiques, informations commerciales, et la foire de leipzig 1920–40

A la veille de la deuxième guerre mondiale, l'Allemagne dominait les imports et les exports dans les pays du sud-est de l'Europe. Les institutions soutenant le commerce allemand pendant les anneées 1930 remontaient pourtant à la décennie précédente. Cet article montre que c'est grâce à l'une des ces institutions, la foire de Leipzig, que le commerce entre l'Allemagne et la Yugoslavie se remit des dislocations qui avaient suivi la première guerre mondiale. Les commerces allemands faisaient traîner leur retour dans la région, mais la foire forgea un réseau commercial dans l'Europe du sud-est, réseau se dédia à transmettre les informations économiques, à déceler des agents prêts à repésenter les entreprises allemandes, et à faire de la publicité pour les produits allemands. Pendant les années 1930, ces représentants de la foire formaient la charpente du réseau commercial allemand dans la région.

Für deutschland in südosteuropa werben: wirtschaftliche ungewissheiten, handelswissen und die leipziger messe, 1920–1940

Am Vorabend des Zweiten Weltkriegs dominierte Deutschland die Exporte und Importe südosteuropäischer Länder. Die Institutionen, welche diese Handelsbeziehungen unterstützten, hatten sich bereits während der 1930er Jahre herausgebildet. Dieser Artikel zeigt, dass eine einzige Institution, die Leipziger Messe, Deutschland ganz wesentlich dabei half, die Probleme zu überwinden, die nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg seine Beziehungen zu Jugoslawien charakterisiert hatten. Während eines Jahrzehnts, während dessen deutsche Firmen nur langsam in diese Region zurückkehrten, half die Leipziger Messe ihnen dabei, ein groβ angelegtes Handelsnetzwerk in Südosteuropa zu etablieren. Dieses half ihnen dabei, Wirtschaftsnachrichten zu kommunizieren, Agenten für deutsche Firmen zu finden und übernahm auch die Werbung für deutsche Produkte. Anfang der dreiβiger Jahre waren die Vertreter der Messe dann zum Rückgrat der deutschen Handelsnetzwerke in Südosteuropa geworden.

Type
Articles
Information
Contemporary European History , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 19 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zagreb Consul Gottfried Walbeck to the Leipzig Trade fair, 23 Oct. 1925, Leipziger Messe 54232/Film 41488, Auswärtiges Amt (AA) R901, Bundesarchiv Berlin (BA); Walbeck (1884–1934).

2 Einzig, Paul, Bloodless Invasion: German Economic Penetration into Danubian States and the Balkans (London: Duckworth, 1939)Google Scholar; Basch, Antonin, The Danube Basin and the German Economic Sphere (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943)Google Scholar.

3 Memo by Karl Ritter of the Foreign Office, 1 June 1940, doc. 622 in Noakes, J. and Pridham, G., eds., Nazism 1919–1945: A Documentary Reader, vol. 3: Foreign Policy, War and Racial Extermination (Exeter: Exeter University Publications, 1988), 886–7Google Scholar.

4 On the Yugoslav perspective see Ristovic, Milan, ‘Weder Souveränität noch Industrialisierung. Die südosteuropäische Länder in der “neuen Ordnung”: Jugoslawische und deutsche Perspectiven (1940–1944)’, in Sachse, Carola, ed., ‘Mitteleuropa’ und ‘Südosteuropa’ als Planungsraum. Wirtschafts- und kulturpolitische Expertisen im Zeitalter der Weltkriege (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2010), 219–40Google Scholar; Kosier, Ljubomir, Grossdeutschland und Jugoslawien (aus der Südslawischen Perspektive) (Berlin: Mitteleuropäischer Verlag, 1939)Google Scholar.

5 Mitchell, B. R., International Historical Statistics, Europe 1750–2005 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 728Google Scholar; In 1924 German exports and imports to Yugoslavia were just 62 million RM and 45.6 million RM. In comparison, in 1939 they were 131.5 million and 181.3 million RM respectively; Kosier, Grossdeutschland, 168–78.

6 Stegmann, Dirk, ‘Mitteleuropa 1925–1934: zum Problem der Kontinuität deutscher Aussenhandelpolitik von Stresemann bis Hitler’, in Wendt, Bernd-Jürgen and Witt, Peter-Christian et al. , eds, Industrielle Gesellschaft und politisches System (Bonn: Verlag Neue Ges, 1978), 203–21Google Scholar; Volkmann, Hans-Erich, ‘Part II: The National Socialist Economy in Preparation for War: From International Economy to Large-area Economy’, in Germany and the Second World War, vol. 1: The Build-up of German Aggression (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 159–73, 273–309Google Scholar; Tooze, Adam, Wages of Destruction, the Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy (London: Allen Lane, 2006), 91Google Scholar.

7 Berend, Ivan and Ranki, György, Economic Development in East-Central Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974)Google Scholar.

8 Hirschman, Albert, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945/1980)Google Scholar.

9 Ritschl, Albrecht, ‘Nazi Economic Imperialism and the Exploitation of the Small: Evidence from Germany's Secret Foreign Exchange Balances, 1938–1940’, The Economic History Review (New Series), 54, 2 (May 2001), 324–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Milward, Alan, ‘The Reichsmark Bloc and the International Economy’, in Hirschfeld, Gerhard, ed., Der ‘Führerstaat’: Mythos und Realität. Studien zur Struktur und Politik des Dritten Reiches (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1981), 377–413Google Scholar; for an excellent overview of the debate between Milward and diplomatic historians over German economic exploitation of south-eastern Europe, see Grenzebach, William S., Germany's Informal Empire in East-Central Europe: German Economic Policy Toward Yugoslavia and Rumania, 1933–1939 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1988), 209–35Google Scholar.

10 By 1936–1938 the real per capita exports of most south-eastern Europe countries had returned to pre-depression level. Lampe, John R., Balkans into South-eastern Europe: A Century of War and Transition (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 130–36Google Scholar.

11 Grenzebach, Empire; Volkmann, ‘National Socialist Economy’.

12 Report cited in Volkmann, Hans-Erich, ‘NS-Aussenhandel im “geschlossenen” Kriegswirtschaftsraum 1939–1941’, in idem, Ökonomie und Expansion: Grundzüge der NS-Wirtschaftspolitik. Ausgewählte Schriften (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 2003), 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Carola Sachse, ed., Planungsraum; Seckendorf, Martin, ‘Der Mitteleuropäische Wirtschaftstag. Zentralstelle der Großwirtschaft zur Durchdringung Südosteuropas’, in Röhr, Werner and Berlekamp, Brigitte, eds., Der Krieg vor dem Krieg: Politik und Ökonomie der ‘friedlichen’ Aggressionen Deutschlands 1938/39 (Hamburg: VSA Verlag, 2001), 118–40Google Scholar; Hayes, Peter, Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Schröter, Verena, ‘The IG Farbenindustrie AG in Central and South-East Europe, 1926–1938’, in Teichova, Alice and Cottrell, P. L., eds., International Business and Central Europe, 1918–1939 (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1983), 139–72Google Scholar.

14 See, for example, Stephen Gross, ‘Das Mitteleuropa-Institut in Dresden: Verknüpfung regionaler Wirtschaftsinteressen mit deutscher Auslandskulturpolitik in der Zwischenkriegszeit’, in Sachse, ed., Planungsraum, 115–40.

15 North, Douglass C., Structure and Change in Economic History (New York: Norton, 1981), 5, 33–40Google Scholar.

16 Greif, Avner, ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition’, The American Economic Review, 83, 3 (1993), 525–48Google Scholar; Granovetter, Mark, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3 (1985), 481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Ranki, György, Economy and Foreign Policy: The Struggle of the Great Powers for Hegemony in the Danube Valley, 1919–1939 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), 19Google Scholar; P. L. Cottrell, ‘Aspects of Western Equity Investment in the Banking Systems of East Central Europe’, in Teichova and Cottrell, Business, 312.

18 Plessis, Alain and Feiertag, Olivier, ‘The Position and Role of French Finance in the Balkans from the Late Nineteenth Century until the Second World War’, in Kostis, Kostas P., ed., Modern Banking in the Balkans and West-European Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Brookfield, Vt: Ashgate, 1999), 225Google Scholar; Herbert Matis, ‘Disintegration and Multi-National Enterprises in Central Europe During the Post-War Years (1918–23)’ in Teichova and Cottrell, Business, 89; Lampe, John and Jackson, Marvin R., Balkan Economic History, 1550–1950: From Imperial Borderlands to Developing Nations (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), 395Google Scholar; Tooze, Adam and Ivanov, Martin, ‘Disciplining the Black Sheep of the Balkans: Financial Supervision and Sovereignty in Bulgaria 1902–1938’, Economic History Review, 64, 1 (2010), 30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Teichova, Alice, Kleinstaaten im Spannungsfeld der Grossmächte, Wirtschaft und Politik in Mittel- und Südosteuropa in der Zwischenkriegszeit (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1988), 76–80, 87–95Google Scholar.

20 Brothers Eberhardt to Berlin Foreign Office, 10 May 1924, Aussenhandel mit dem Balkan 54160, AA/R901, BA.

21 German Consul in Belgrade to Berlin Foreign Office, 2 Oct. 1920, Handel mit Yugoslawien 54163/Film 40724, AA/R901, BA.

22 Lampe, Borderlands, 227–28.

23 Schröter, Harm, ‘Europe in the Strategies of Germany's Electrical Engineering and Chemical Trusts’, in Berghahn, Volker, ed., Quest for Economic Empire: European Strategies of German Big Business in the Twentieth Century (Providence: Berghahn Books, 1996), 41–2Google Scholar; Balderston, Theo, The Origins and Course of the German Economic Crisis 1923–1932 (Berlin: Haude und Spener, 1993), 95Google Scholar; Verena Schröter, ‘Farbenindustrie’, 141–44.

24 ‘Bericht über die Tätigkeit des Leipziger Messe, Geschäftsjahr 15, 1931’, Leipziger Messeamt 7844, Aussenwärtigen Angelegenheiten (AA) 10717, Sächsische Staatsarchiv Dresden (SSAD).

25 Confidential parliamentary report on establishing a service for the promotion of German foreign trade from 1926, Aussenhandelsförderung 106582, Handelspolitische Abteilung (HA), Politisches Archiv des Auswärtiges Amt (PAAA).

26 Jurkovic, Bozidar, Das Ausländische Kapital in Jugoslavien (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1941), 134–6Google Scholar; Plessis, ‘Finance’, 225; Mitrovic, Andrej, Serbia's Great War 1914–1918 (West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2007), 78Google Scholar; Matis, ‘Disintegration’, 89; Lampe, Borderlands, 395.

27 Report by Walbeck circulated by Belgrade Legation to Berlin Foreign Office, 22 June 1925, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

28 Hardach, Gerd, ‘Banking and Industry in Germany in the Inter-war Period 1919–1939’, The Journal of European Economic History, 13, 2 (1984), special issueGoogle Scholar; Balderston, Theo, ‘German Banking Between the Wars: the Crisis of the Credit Banks’, Business History Review, 65, 3 (1991), 554–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Confidential parliamentary report on establishing a service for the promotion of German foreign trade from 1926, Aussenhandelsförderung 106582, HA, PAAA.

30 Ibid.

31 See Belgrad Presse- und Nachrichtendienst 121018, Presseabteilung (PA), PAAA.

32 Leipzig chamber of commerce to German legation in Belgrade, 14 Aug. 1926, Vertreter Deutsche Firmen in Jugoslawien 54226/Film 41401, AA/R901, BA.

33 Business report of Aussenhandelsverband-Handelsvertragsverein (AHV) for 1926–27, AHV 1040, R 57/Neu, Bundesarchiv Koblenz (BAK); report from the branch office for foreign trade from 15 July 1925, AHV 1040, R 57/Neu, BAK.

34 Report on the German-Yugoslav Chamber of Commerce, 20 Feb. 1930, Handelskammern in Yugoslawien 54222/film 41336, AA/R901, BA.

35 Report from Dr Schmidtlein on the condition of Germany's business in Yugoslavia in response to the Enquete Ausschuss, 21 April 1927, Wirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Jugoslawien 43085, AA/R901, BA. Also found in R 243085, RZ 206, AA/PAAA; German diplomat in Vienna to Berlin Foreign Office, 18 Dec. 1923, Vertretern deutsche Firmen in Jugoslawien 54226/Film 41406, AA/R901, BA; Harm Schröter, ‘Siemens and Central and South-East Europe between the Two World Wars’, in Teichova and Cottrell, Business, 175–80; Matis, ‘Disintegration’, 93; Aleksic, Vesna, ‘The History of the Allgemeiner Jugoslawischer Bankverein AG in Belgrade in the Context of Yugoslav Banking History after 1918’, in Rathkolb, Oliver, Venus, Theodor and Zimmerl, Ulrike, eds., 150 Jahre österreichische Bankengeschichte im Zentrum Europas (Vienna: Zsolnay, 2005), 226–38Google Scholar.

36 Branch office for foreign trade in Nuremburg to the Berlin Foreign Office, 20 April 1922, Aussenhandel mit dem Balkan 54160, AA/R901, BA; Report from chamber of commerce in Munich, 12 Jan. 1926, Handel mit Yugoslawien 54223/Film 41368, AA/R901, BA. On the trade treaty see Hopfner, Hans Paul, Deutsche Südosteuropapolitik in der Weimarer Republik (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1983)Google Scholar.

37 German Consul in Belgrade to Berlin Foreign Office, 2 Oct. 1920, 63, Handel mit Yugoslawien 54163/Film 40724, AA/R901, BA; see also the numerous complaints about the Yugoslav tariff and border control from 1925 and 1926, 35–62, Handelpropaganda 54223/Film 41368, AA/R901, BA.

38 Walbeck to Berlin Foreign Office, 12 Feb. 1923, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

39 Walbeck to Berlin Foreign Office from 12 Feb. 1923 and 6 Nov. 1925, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

40 Walbeck to Berlin Foreign Office, 6 Nov. 1925, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

41 Bulletin about commercial exchange with Yugoslavia, 9 Jan. 1926, Vertretern deutsche Firmen in Jugoslawien 54226/Film 41404, AA/R901, BA; The Foreign Office, the Foreign Trade Association and the Association of Saxon Industrialists echoed these remarks in their own reports. Sächsische Industrie: Organ des Verbandes Sächsischer Industrieller, Sächsische Industrie- und Handelszeitung, 12 Feb. 1927; Report from Dr Schmidtlein, 21 April 1927, Wirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Jugoslawien 40835, AA/R901, BA.

42 Memorandum from AHV circulated by Bucharest Consul to Berlin Foreign Office, 2 May 1925, Romänien Handelsbeziehungen mit Deutschland 89209, HA, PAAA.

43 Belgrade Consul report to Berlin Foreign Office, 2 Oct. 1920, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54163/Film 40724, AA/R901, BA.

44 Cottrell, ‘Equity’, 312; Feldman, Gerald, The Great Disorder: Politics, Economics, and Society in the German Inflation 1914–1924 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 393Google Scholar; Branch office for foreign trade in Nuremburg to the Foreign Office in Berlin, 20 April 1922, Aussenhandel mit dem Balkan 54160, AA/R901, BA; Sächsische Industrie 31, Jan. 1925.

45 Branch office of foreign trade in Munich to the Berlin Foreign Office, 4 Feb. 1922, Leipzig Messe 54232/Film 41484, AA/R901, BA; Report from Dr Schmidtlein, 21 April 1927, Wirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Yugoslawien 43085, AA/R901, BA; Belgrade consul to Berlin Foreign Office, 16 Mar. 1923, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

46 Firms with 1–4 employees were counted as small, firms with 5–49 were counted as medium, firms above 50 were considered large. Statistisches Jahrbuch für den Freistaat Sachsen (1929), 80–1; Leipzig Fair Business report, 31 Dec. 1931, Messen und Märkte – Leipzig 117904, SW, PAAA.

47 Herrigel, Gary, Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 33–71Google Scholar.

48 Abelshauser, Werner, The Dynamics of German Industry: Germany's Path Toward the New Economy and the American Challenge (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005), 48–54, 56–65Google Scholar.

49 Zwahr, Hartmut, Topfstedt, Thomas and Bentele, Günter, eds., Leipzigs Messen 1497–1997: Gestaltwandel, Umbrüche, Neubeginn (Cologne: Böhlau, 1999)Google Scholar.

50 Paris Embassy to Berlin Foreign Office, 16 Aug. 1928, Messen und Märkte – Leipzig 117902, Sonderreferat Wirtschaft (SW), PAAA.

51 ‘Die Entwicklung der Leipziger Messe und ihre Bedeutung für die Volkswirtschaft’, Druckschriften (DS) 905, Leipzig Messeamt (LMA), Sächsische Staatsarchiv Leipzig (SSAL).

52 Bramstedt, Paul, Krises der Sächsischen Industriewirtschaft (Dresden: Limpert, 1932), 13Google Scholar.

53 Hess, Ulrich and Schäffer, Michael, eds., Unternehmer in Sachsen: Aufstieg – Krise – Untergang – Neubeginn (Leipzig: Leipzig University Press, 1998), 10–11Google Scholar; Wagenführ, Rolf, Die Bedeutung des Aussenmärktes für die deutsche Industriewirtschaft: Die Exportquote der deutschen Industrie von 1870 bis 1936 (Berlin: Hanseat. Verl.-Anst. Hamburg, 1936)Google Scholar.

54 Bramke, Werner, ‘Sachsens Industrie (Gesellschaft) in den Jahren der Weimarer Republik’, in Bramke, Werner and Hess, Ulrich, eds., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft in Sachsen im 20. Jahrhundert (Leipzig: Leipzig University Press, 1998), 28, 41Google Scholar; Rudloff, Michael, ‘Die Strukturpolitik in den Debatten des sächsischen Landtags zur Zeit der Weltwirtschaftskrise’, in Bramke, Werner and Hess, Ulrich, eds., Sachsen und Mitteldeutschland, Politische, wirtschaftliche und soziale Wandlungen im 20. Jahrundert (Weimar: Böhlau, 1995), 242Google Scholar.

55 On the founding of the Messeamt see Jochen Geyer, ‘Die Selbstverwaltete Messe: Der Messestandort zwischen 1916 und 1945’, in Zwahr, Messen; Köhler was the director of the fair until 1937. Personalakten Raimund Köhler, Geschäftsakten (GA) 1544, LMA, SSAL.

56 Quoted in ‘Urteile, Berichte, und Zahlen über Messeverlauf’, 92, DS 248, LMA SSAL. This refers to the Vierteljahreshefte zur Konjunkturforschung, 3, 3 (1928), 42.

57 Leipzig Fair annual business report, 31 Dec. 1931, Messen und Märkte – Leipzig 117904, SW, PAAA.

58 From 1928 to 1930 the fair conducted regular surveys, the results of which indicate a lower figure for its export business. ‘Messen und Weltwirtschaft’, 21, DS 900, and also ‘Aus der Praxis der Exportpropaganda’, DS 908, LMA, SSAL; ‘Die Lage der verarbeitenden Industrie’ by the Institut für Konjunkturforschung, DS 911, LMA, SSAL; See the report about these polls, pages 95, 101, 133 in ‘Urteile, Berichte, und Zahlen über Messeverlauf’, DS 247–8, LMA, SSAL; Saxon Consul in Berlin to Dresden Foreign Office 3 Mar. 1931, Leipzig Messe 7843, AA 10717, SSAD.

59 Articles translated from Croatian into German by the Messeamt's business offices in Belgrade, 79–80, Jugoslawisches Ausstellung, GA 146, LMA, SSAL.

60 See the correspondence between Walbeck, the Messeamt and the Belgrade Legation, 179–90, Leipziger Messe 54232/Film 41488, AA/R901, BA.

61 ‘Die Lage der verarbeitenden Industrie 1929’, DS 913, LMA, SSAL; see also Paul Voss on ‘Das Problem der Exportförderung’ who saw the one of the Messeamt's primary tasks to be finding good ‘information about exports and schooling for exporters’. ‘Das Problem der Exportförderung’, DS 902, LMA, SSAL.

62 Messeamt to Dr Borota in Novisad, 29 Apr. 1925, GA 1000, LMA, SSAL.

63 Paul Voss, ‘Die Entwicklung der Leipziger Messe und ihre Bedeutung für die Volkswirtschaft’, 4, DS 905, LMA, SSAL.

64 Calic, Marie-Janine, ‘The Socio-Economic Development of Yugoslavia during the Inter-war Period: A Regional Point of View’, in Batou, Jean and David, Thomas, eds., Uneven Development in Europe: The Obstructed Growth of the Agricultural Countries, 1918–1939 (Geneva: Droz, 1998), 332Google Scholar.

65 Belgrade consul to Berlin Foreign Office, 21 Aug. 1926 and 8 Mar. 1927, Leipzig Messe 54232/Film 41488, AA/R901, BA; Report from Dr Schmidtlein, 21 April 1927, Wirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Jugoslawien 40835, AA/R901, BA; Belgrade consul to Berlin Foreign Office, 8 Mar. and 21 Aug. 1927, Leipzig Messe 54232/Film 41488, AA/R901, BA.

66 ‘Aus der Praxis der Exportpropaganda’, DS 908, LMA, SSAL.

67 In comparison, the Messeamt's budget for their work in Italy in 1926 was 31,000 RM. ‘Produktive Erwerbslosenfürsorge durch Auslandspropaganda’, DS 906, LMA, SSAL.

68 ‘Aus der Praxis der Exportpropaganda’, DS 908, LMA, SSAL.

69 Dittrich, Erich, Südosteuropa und die Reichsmesse Leipzig (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1941)Google Scholar; Messeamt to the Ministry for Trade and Industry in Belgrade, 2 Jun. 1926, GA 146, LMA, SSAL.

70 Report to D. Voach, 154, Jugoslawische Vertreter in Novisad, GA 1000, LMA, SSAL.

71 Dr Carl Georg Bruns to Councillor Krahmer-Möllenberg, 2 Nov. 1926, Jugoslawien 978, Deutsche Stiftung (DSt)/R8043, BA.

72 Mathies to the Economics Ministry, 20 Oct. 1926 and Hubert Kolletnig of Marburg to Councillor Krahmer-Möllenberg, 24 Feb. 1927, Jugoslawien 978, DSt/R8043, BA.

73 Although this idea for a study trip found strong vocal support from the German consul in Belgrade, neither the Foreign Office nor the Economics Ministry were able to support the trip financially, and it is difficult to ascertain from the sources whether such a trip eventually occurred or not, 217–20, Jugoslawien 978, DS R8043, BA.

74 Walbeck to Berlin Foreign Office, 6 Nov. 1925, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA; Report from Dr Schmidtlein, 21 April 1927, Wirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Jugoslawien 40835, AA/R901, BA; Sächsische Industrie, 12 Feb. 1927 and 7 Jan. 1928.

75 Report from Walbeck circulated by Belgrade consul to Berlin Foreign Office, 22 Jun. 1925, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

76 The archival trade files are filled with such requests. See, for example, the letters of 27 May and 19 July 1922, Vertreter deutsche Firmen in Jugoslawien 54226/Film 41404, AA/R901, BA; confidential Bulletin for trade with the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes from 1926, 254, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

77 Consular reports of 15 Dec 1922, and 5, 25, 29 Jan. 1923, Handel mit Jugoslawien 54164/Film 40725, AA/R901, BA.

78 Hopfner, Südosteuropapolitik, 343–53.

79 German figures compiled from Wirtschaft und Statistik, 7–9 (1927–1929); Yugoslav figures drawn from Statisticki Godisnjak/Annuaire Statistique, 1 (1929) (Belgrade: Državnoj štampariji Kraljevine Srbije, 1932).

80 Foreign Minister Neurath in a circular to German missions in 1936 urging them to promote German exports: ‘no task is more important than this one’, Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918–1945, From the Archives of the German Foreign Ministry (Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949–64), Series C. vol. 5, no. 485, 30 July 1936, 842.

81 Hayes, Peter, ‘Corporate Freedom of Action’, Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, 45 (2009), 30Google Scholar.

82 What businessmen found most obnoxious in the New Plan was ‘the need to locate purchasers and suppliers in the predominantly non-industrial countries that were willing to enter into special trade balancing or clearing agreements with the Reich’. Hayes, Industry and Ideology, 131.

83 Documents on Foreign Policy, Series C. vol. 5, no. 511, Aug. 17, 1936; Overall, between the conclusion of Germany's commercial agreement with Yugoslavia in 1934 and the end of 1937 the German–Yugoslav trade commission met and changed the rules of commerce at least seven separate times, not including alterations negotiated outside the auspices of the official trade conferences.

84 In addition, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Denmark, Egypt and Brazil organised official displays in 1937. Messeamt to Alexander Cincar Markovic 13 Feb. 1937, GA 147, LMA, SSAL.

85 Correspondence between Voss and Leipzig Messeamt, 9 Nov. 1937, and Description of Yugoslav exhibition, 135, GA 147, LMA, SSAL.

86 Dittrich, Reichsmesse, 101–12; Krugmann, Robert, Südosteuropa und Grossdeutschland (Breslau: Breslauer Verlags- und Druckerei- G.m.b.H, 1939), 85, 187–92Google Scholar; Grenzebach, Empire, 42–3.

87 Voss in Belgrade to Messeamt, 12 Dec. 1935, and Messeamt to Voss, 28 Dec. 1935, 147, GA, LMA, SSAL.

88 Statisticki Godisnjak: Kraljevina Jugoslavija, 9 (1938–1939).

89 ‘Ergebnis der Leipziger Frühjahrsmesse 1936’, 932, DS, LMA, SSAL; Belgrade Business office to Berlin DRHK, 28 Jan. 1937 and Belgrade Business office to Dr Ernst Neer, 4 Feb. 1937, and Köhler to DRHK Berlin, 28 Jan. 1937, GA 152, LMA, SSAL; Messeamt to Heydendorff, 4 Feb. 1937, GA 811, LMA, SSAL.

90 Dittrich, Reichsmesse, 59, 114–17; Berend and Ranki, East-Central Europe, 279.

91 Report from the Mitteleuropäische Wirtschaftstag, 294a Gutachten, R 63/Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft, BA.

92 Tooze, Wages, 67–71; see also Schweitzer, Arthur, ‘Foreign Exchange Crisis of 1936’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 118, 2 (1962), 243–77Google Scholar.

93 Basch, Danube Basin, 183.

94 On the new place of the Leipzig fair in the Nazi economy see Köhler, Raimund, ‘Leipziger Messe im Vierjahresplan’, Der Vierjahresplan: Zeitschrift für Nationalsozialistische Wirtschaftspolitik, 1 (1937), 153–4Google Scholar.