Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:34:57.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remobilizing Dance Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Jens Richard Giersdorf  and
Yutian Wong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay uses as its case study the reconstruction of an East German Vietnamese socialist folk dance Spring in Vietnam (1969) to reflect on Randy Martin's 1998 conviction that Dance Studies has the potential to embody and materialize solutions to intellectual and political issues that have been left out of other academic disciplines. Written as a play script, the essays performs a remobilization of Dance Studies and its potential to reflect on its disciplinary authority.

Keywords

AcademyDance Studiesdisciplinary discoursesEast German dancemethodologyparodypoliticspropagandatheoryVietnamese dance
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 48 , Special Issue 3: Randy Martin and Dance Studies , December 2016 , pp. 70 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adshead-Landsdale, Janet, and Layson, June, eds. 1994. Dance History: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Aijaz. 1992. In Theory; Classes, Nations, Literatures. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Albright, Ann Cooper. 1997. Choreographing Difference: The Body and Identity in Contemporary Dance. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1994. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory, edited by Williams, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura, 324–39. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brandstetter, Gabriele. 1995. Tanz-Lektüren: Körperbilder und Raumfiguren der Avantgarde. Berlin: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Burt, Ramsay. 1995. The Male Dancer: Bodies, Spectacles, and Sexuality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chiang, Mark. 2009. The Cultural Capital of Asian American Studies: Autonomy and Representation in the University. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cowell, Alan. 1995. “The Vietnamese in Germany: No Job, No County.” New York Times, October 13. http://www.nytimes.com/1995/10/13/world/the-vietnamese-in-germany-no-jobs-no-country.html.Google Scholar
Daly, Ann. 1995. Done into Dance: Isadora Duncan in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dance Research Journal. 2011. Vol. 43, no.2.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. 1990. “Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Frau Trenz und der Fraktion DIE GRÜNEN/Bündnis 90.” 1. Drucksache 11/8433.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh, ed. 1995. Choreographing History. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh, ed. 1996. Corporealities: Dancing Knowledge, Culture, Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” The Foucault Reader, edited by Rabinow, Paul, 76–100. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Franco, Jean. 1988. “Beyond Ethnocentrism: Gender, Power, and the Third-World Intelligentsia.” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. edited by Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, 503–18. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1995. Dancing Modernism/ Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Giersdorf, Jens Richard. 2009. “Dance Studies in the International Academy.” Dance Research Journal 41 (1): 23–44.Google Scholar
Giersdorf, Jens Richard. 2013. The Body of the People: East German Dance since 1945. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gottschild, Brenda Dixon. 1998. Digging the Africanist Presence in American Performance: Dance and Other Contexts. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Andrew. 2005. Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday Life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Gabriele. 1994. FrauenKörperTanz: Eine Zivilisationsgeschichte des Tanzes. Munich: Heyne Verlag.Google Scholar
Konegen, Helga. 1972. “Analytische Betrachtungen zu ‘Frühling in Vietnam.’” Material zum Theater 8 (1): 35–43.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2006. Exhausting Dance: Performance and Politics of Movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 1993. Ecstasy and the Demon: The Dances of Mary Wigman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1995. “Moving Bodies/Making Politics.” Syllabus. University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. “For Dance Studies.” In his Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics, 181–218. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 2011. Under New Management: Universities, Administrative Labor, and the Professional Turn. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Midgelow, Vida. 2007. Reworking the Ballet: Counter Narratives and Alternative Bodies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ness, Sally Ann. 1992. Body, Movement, and Culture: Kinesthetic and Visual Symbolism in a Philippine Community. City: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Kent, and Sloop, John. 2002. Shifting Borders: Rhetoric, Immigration, and California's Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ridlan, Hans-Peter. 1967. “Kunst ist Waffe!” Festschrift Rudolstadt. Leipzig: Zentralhaus für Kulturarbeit der DDR, 17–18.Google Scholar
Rothfield, Philipa. 2010. “Differentiating Phenomenology and Dance.” In Routledge Dance Studies Reader, edited by Giersdorf, Jens, Wong, Yutian, and O'Shea, Janet, 303–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Said, Eward W. 1979. Orientalism New York:Google Scholar
Savigliano, Marta. 1995. Tango and the Political Economy of Passion. City: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schurig, Gudrun. 1972. “‘Frühling in Vietnam’: Kunst und Politik im Prozess des Gestaltens.” Material zum Theater 20 (3): 26–31.Google Scholar
Schwenkel, Christina. 2009. The American War in Contemporary Vietnam. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schwenkel, Christina. 2012. “Civilizing the City: Socialist Ruins and Urban Renewal in Central Vietnam.” asia critique 20 (2): 379–401.Google Scholar
Schwenkel, Christina. 2013. “Post/Socialist Affect: Ruination and Reconstruction of the Nation in Urban Vietnam.” Cultural Anthropology 28 (2): 252–77.Google Scholar
Siegmund, Gerald. 2006. Abwesenheit: Eine performative Ästhetik des Tanzes. Bielefeld: Transscript.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, 271–313. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Tomko, Linda. 2000. Dancing Class: Gender, Ethnicity, and Social Divides in American Dance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Will, Gerhard. 2002. “Chancen und Risiken deutscher Politik in Vietnam.” SWP-Studie. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.Google Scholar
Wong, Yutian. 2010. Choreographing Asian America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar