Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:21:52.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body Composition and the Comparison of Measurement Techniques in Different Levels and Styles of Dancers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Robin D. Chmelar ,
Sally S. Fitt ,
Barry B. Schultz ,
Robert O. Ruhling  and
Terry Shepherd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The physical appearance required in dance, particularly in terms of body weight and fat, is often a demand that hovers over the aspiring and professional dancer's career (Vincent, 1979). This investigation was intended to measure various aspects of body composition in different types of dancers, as well as use various methods. Measurements of percent body fat and lean weight may serve as a means of quantifying appearance in dance so that dancers may be guided towards appropriate body composition goals. This may be more reflective of the dancer's true physique than relying simply on total body weight, which does not take proportions of muscle and fat into account. Kirkendall and Calabrese (1983) have noted that attention must be paid to lean mass in dancers as well as percent fat. A method of evaluating the relationship between height, lean mass (fat free weight), and total weight was developed for this study to address the issue of proportion (i.e., a dancer who perhaps has a low percent fat level but is still considered too “heavy” because of a large muscle mass).

Although hydrostatic weighing has been noted as “the gold standard” in body composition measurements (Nash, 1985), such methods are often unavailable or impractical for professional dancers or university dance departments. Anthropometric (or “skinfold”) methods have greater practicality, but may lack the individual accuracy of hydrostatic methods (Nash, 1985). Recently, electrical impedance has been cited as a convenient alternative to both underwater and skinfold techniques (Harrison & Van Italli, 1982; Presta, et al. 1984).

Type
Research Article
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Summer 1988 , pp. 37 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brooks, G. A., & Fahey, T.D.Exercise physiology: Human bioenergetics and its applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P.M., Freedson, P.S., Keller, B., Carney, D., & Skrinar, M.Maximal oxygen uptake, nutritional patterns and body composition of adolescent female ballet dancers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1985, 56, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.L., Potosnak, L., Frank, O., & Baker, H.A nutritional and hematologic assessment of elite ballet dancers. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1985, 13(5), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolgener, F.A., Spasoff, T.C., & St. John, W.E.Body build and body composition of high ability female dancers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1980, 51, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleck, S.J.Body composition of elite American athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1983, 11, 398–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, E.L., & Mathews, D.K.The physiological basis of physical education and athletics (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
Harrison, G.G., & Van Italli, T.B.Estimation of body composition: A new approach based on electromagnetic principles. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982, 35, 1176–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katch, F.I., & McArdle, W.D.Nutrition, weight control, and exercise (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1983.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, D.T., & Calabrese, L.H.Physiologic aspects of dance. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 1983, 2, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micheli, L.J., Gillespie, W.J., & Walaszek, A.Physiologic profiles of female professional ballerinas. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 1984, 3, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, H.L.Body fat measurement: Weighing the pros and cons of electrical impedance. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1985, 13(11), 124–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novak, L.P., Magill, L.A., & Schutte, J.E.Macimal oxygen intake and body composition of female dancers. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 1978, 39, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlou, K.N., Steffee, W.P., Lerman, R.H., & Burrows, B.A.Effects of dieting and exercise on lean body mass, oxygen uptake, and strength. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1985, 17, 466–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presta, E., Segal, K.R., Gutin, B., Harrison, G.G., & Van Italli, T.B.Comparison in man of total body electrical conductivity and lean body mass derived from body density: Validation of a new body composition method. Metabolism, 1983, 32, 524–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimmer, J.H., & Rosentswieg, J.The maximum O2 consumption of dance majors. Dance Research Journal, 1981–1982, 14, (1&2), 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, P.J., Eisenman, P.A., & Johnson, S.C.Effects of exercise induced dehydration on biolelecrrical impedance analyzation to determine body composition (Abst.). Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1987, 19(Suppl), S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, P.G., & Astrand, P.O.Physiological characteristics of classical ballet. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1984, 16, 472–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinning, W.E.Anthropometric estimation of body density, fat, and lean body weight in women gymnasts. Medicine and Science in Sports, 1978, 10, 243–249.Google ScholarPubMed
Vincent, L.M.Competing with the sylph. Kansas City: Andrews & McMeel, 1979.Google Scholar
White, L. A. Nutritional intake, percent body fat, and physical fitness among professional ballerinas. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 1982.Google Scholar
Wilmore, J.H., Buskirk, E.R., DiGirolamo, M., & Lohman, T.G.Body composition. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 1986, 14(3), 144–162.Google Scholar
Zabetakis, P.M., Gleim, G.W., Vitting, K.E., Gardenswartz, M.H., Agrawal, M., Michelis, M.F., & Nicholas, J.A.Volume changes effect electrical impedance measurement of body composition (Abst). Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1987, 19(Suppl), S38.Google Scholar