Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:41:47.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dance for Export: Cultural Diplomacy and the Cold War, by Naima Prevots. Hanover and London: Wesleyan University Press, 1999. xiv + 165 pp., introduction, photographs, appendix, bibliography, index. $40.00 clothbound.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Melinda Copel
Melinda Copel
Affiliation:
Temple University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring 1999 , pp. 108 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Eisenhower, Dwight D. quoted in Sorensen's, Thomas C. The Word War: The Story of American Propaganda (New York: Harper & Row, 1968), 31.Google Scholar

2. Letter from Francis J. Colligan, Department of State, to ANTA. 7 June 1951. Robert Breen Theatre Collection, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. Image 22; http://www.gmu.edu/library/special collections/anta/html.

3. Cockcroft, Eva, “Abstract Expressionism: Weapon of the Cold War,” Artforum xii, no. 10 (June 1974): 39–41 Google Scholar; Guilbaut, Serge, How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: Abstract Expressionism, Freedom, and the Cold War, translated by Goldhammer, Arthur (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar

4. Brademas, John, “1991 Nancy Hanks Lecture on Arts and Public Policy,” American Council for the Arts (20 March 1991): 4–7.Google Scholar