Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:49:25.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy's Body, Neoliberalism's Body: The Ambivalent Search for Egalitarianism Within the Contemporary Post/Modern Dance Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

Jose L. Reynoso
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes ways in which dance as labor and artist as a specific subjectivity relate to the material conditions of their production within contexts shaped by neoliberal notions of freedom, ideologies of liberal democracy, and the logic of global capitalism. The discussion focuses on contemporary dance practices that embody some of these values by striving to be more egalitarian, thus giving performers more agency in how they participate in creative processes that lead to a collectively created performance work. This analysis emphasizes the tension between these collaborative practices and modes of producing and distributing financial and symbolic, as well as cultural forms of capital in ways that resist and/or reproduce exploitative aspects of capitalism. Examining some works by Yvonne Rainer, Xavier Le Roy, and Tino Sehgal enables the theorization of the entrepreneurial artistic archive as well as practices of crediting creative labor in relation to notions of capital, ownership, collaboration, and consequently who dance-art makers and performers become as politically progressive artists.

Keywords

Xavier Le RoyTino SehgalYvonne Rainerdance ownershipdance capitalismdance labor and performancedance cultural capitaldance democracycontemporary dancepostmodern danceTrio A
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 51 , Special Issue 1: Work With(Out) Boundaries: Precarity and Dance , April 2019 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Dance Studies Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am deeply grateful for the labor, time, and expertise anonymous readers and coeditors of this volume as well as my colleague Anthea Kraut invested in providing critical feedback. In different forms, their insights are present in the strengths this article might have. All weaknesses in the discussion are totally my responsibility.

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Carol. 2018. One Person, No Vote: How Voter Suppression Is Destroying Our Democracy. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1983. Democracy's Body: Judson Dance Theater, 1962–1964. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Research Press.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1987. Terpsichore in Sneakers: Post-Modern Dance. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Translated by Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnidge, Anne. 2012. “Somatics in the Dance Studio: Embodying Feminist/Democratic Pedagogy.” Journal of Dance Education 12 (2): 37–47.Google Scholar
Burt, Ramsay. 2009. “Trio A in Europe.” Dance Research Journal 41(2): 25–27.Google Scholar
Catterson, Pat. 2009. “I Promised Myself I Would Never Let It Leave My Body's Memory.” Dance Research Journal 41 (2): 3–11.Google Scholar
Cvejić, Bojana. 2011. “Xavier le Roy: The Dissenting Choreography of One Frenchman Less.” In Contemporary French Theater and Performance, edited by Finburgh, Clare and Lavery, Carl, 188–199. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan L. 2002. Dances that Describe Themselves: The Improvised Choreography of Richard Bull. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan L. 2003. “Choreographies of Protest.” Theatre Journal 55 (3): 395–412.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Duncan G. 2014. “A Conceit of the Natural Body: The Universal-Individual in Somatic Dance Training.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2285d6h4Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jill. 1967. “The New American Modern Dance.” In The New American Arts, edited by Kostelanetz, Richard, 162–93. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Kedhar, Anusha. 2014. “Flexibility and Its Bodily Limits: Transnational South Asian Dancers in an Age of Neoliberalism.” Dance Research Journal 46 (1): 23–40.Google Scholar
Klein, Grabriele. 2012. “Labour, Life, Art: On the Social Anthropology of Labour.” Performance Research 17 (6): 4–13.Google Scholar
Kolb, Alexandra. 2013. “Current Trends in Contemporary Choreography: A Political Critique.” Dance Research Journal 45 (3): 31–52.Google Scholar
Kowal, Rebekah J. 2010. How To Do Things with Dance: Performing Change in Postwar America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, Anthea. 2008. Choreographing the Folk: The Dance Stagings of Zora Neale Hurston. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, Anthea. 2016. Choreographing Copyright: Race, Gender, and Intellectual Property Rights in American Dance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work, Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Hampshire, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Kwan, SanSan. 2017. “When is Contemporary Dance?” Dance Research Journal 49 (3): 38–52.Google Scholar
Laermans, Rudi. 2015. Moving Together: Theorizing and Making Contemporary Dance. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
Lakes, Robin. 2005. “The Messages Behind the Methods: The Authoritarian Pedagogical Legacy in Western Concert Dance Technique Training and Rehearsals.” Arts Education Policy Review 106 (5): 3–20.Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2011. “The Misfortunes of the ‘Artistic Critique’ and of Cultural Employment.” In Critique of Creativity: Precarity, Subjectivity and Resistance in the “Creative Industries”, edited by Raunig, Gerald, Ray, Gene, and Wuggenig, Ulf, 41–56. London: MayFly Books.Google Scholar
Le Roy, Xavier. n.d. “Biography.” Accessed July 15, 2018. http://www.xavierleroy.com/page.php?id=ac7d13b59a24c4d4b778159b56ef6d1135577d7e&lg=en.Google Scholar
Lepecki, André. 2016. Singularities: Dance in the Age of Performance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levine, Abigail. 2016. “Walls and Floors: Dance in the Museum” (lecture). Dance Studies Colloquium Speaker Series. Boyer College of Music and Dance, Temple University, March 8. Accessed July 16, 2018. https://livestream.com/accounts/1927261/events/4314594/videos/114863024.Google Scholar
Lubow, Arthur. 2010. “Making Art Out of an Encounter.” The New York Times Magazine, January 15. Accessed July 23, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/17/magazine/17seghal-t.html.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 2017. “Scenes of Reenactment/Logics of Derivation in Dance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Reenactment, edited by Franko, Mark, 549–69. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Jon. 2001. Perform or Else: from Discipline to Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pewny, Katharina and Leenknegt, Simon. 2012. “La Précarité Dans La Performance Diese Beschäftigung De Tino Sehgal.” Ligeia 25 (117–120): 196–202.Google Scholar
Paramana, Katerina. 2014. “On Resistance through Ruptures and the Rupture of Resistances.” Performance Research 19 (6): 81–89.Google Scholar
Rainer, Yvonne. 2009. “Trio A: Genealogy, Documentation, Notation.” Dance Research Journal 41 (2): 12–18.Google Scholar
Rainer, Yvonne, paggett, taisha, and Crimp, Douglas. 2011. “Yvonne Rainer Accuses Marina Abramović and LA MOCA of Exploiting Performers.” Artforum, November 11. Accessed July 15, 2018. https://www.artforum.com/news/yvonne-rainer-accuses-marina-abramovi-263-and-la-moca-of-exploiting-performers-29348.Google Scholar
Reynoso, Jose L. Forthcoming. “Towards a Critical Globalized Humanities: Dance Research in Mexico City at the CENIDID.” In The Futures of Dance Studies, edited by Susan Manning, Janice Ross, and Rebecca Schneider, 676–701. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Savigliano, Marta. 1995. Tango and the Political Economy of Passion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Danielle. 2009. “Tino Sehgal.” W Magazine, November 1. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.wmagazine.com/story/tino-sehgal.Google Scholar
Wookey, Sara. n.d. “Portfolio—Teaching.” Wookey Works. Accessed November 1, 2018. http://sarawookey.com/portfolio/teaching/.Google Scholar
Wookey, Sara. 2011. “An Open Letter From a Dancer Who Refused to Participate in Marina Abramović’s MOCA Performance.” Blouinartinfo, November 23. Accessed July 19, 2018. http://www.blouinartinfo.com/news/story/751666/an-open-letter-from-a-dancer-who-refused-to-participate-in.Google Scholar