Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 80
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Blom, Nicolaas Haupt, Grietjie and Fraser, William 2018. Naïve Designers’ Information Use during the Design Process in a Low-Resource Classroom. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 14, Issue. 6,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cash, Philip Škec, Stanko and Štorga, Mario 2019. The dynamics of design: exploring heterogeneity in meso-scale team processes. Design Studies, Vol. 64, Issue. , p. 124.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cash, Philip Daalhuizen, Jaap Valgeirsdottir, Dagny and Van Oorschot, Robin 2019. A Theory-Driven Design Research Agenda: Exploring Dual-Process Theory. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 1373.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Law, Matthew V. Dhawan, Nikhil Bang, Hyunseung Yoon, So-Yeon Selva, Daniel and Hoffman, Guy 2019. Design Computing and Cognition '18. p. 155.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hay, L. Duffy, A. H. B. Gilbert, S. J. Lyall, L. Campbell, G. Coyle, D. and Grealy, M. A. 2019. The neural correlates of ideation in product design engineering practitioners. Design Science, Vol. 5, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hay, Laura Duffy, Alex and Grealy, Madeleine 2019. The Novelty Perspectives Framework: A New Conceptualisation of Novelty for Cognitive Design Studies. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 389.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Lame, Guillaume 2019. Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 1633.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Martinec, Tomislav Škec, Stanko Horvat, Nikola and Štorga, Mario 2019. A state-transition model of team conceptual design activity. Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 103.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Djari, Chahinez and Arrouf, Abdelmalek 2019. The Impact of Viewing Images of Precedents on the Cognitive Process of Architectural Idea Generation. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 209.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Sakao, Tomohiko Gero, John and Mizuyama, Hajime 2020. Analyzing cognitive processes of a product/service-system design session using protocol analysis. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 515.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kim, Yong Se Jeong, Jiyun Hong, YeonKoo and Hong, Seok Jin 2020. A Schema for Systematic Service Imagining: Context-Based Activity Modeling. Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue. 22, p. 9558.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hay, Laura Cash, Philip and McKilligan, Seda 2020. The future of design cognition analysis. Design Science, Vol. 6, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Martinec, Tomislav Škec, Stanko Perišić, Marija Majda and Štorga, Mario 2020. Revisiting Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in the Context of Team Conceptual Design Activity. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, Issue. 18, p. 6303.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Lee, Ju Hyun Ostwald, Michael J. and Gu, Ning 2020. Design Thinking: Creativity, Collaboration and Culture. p. 33.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Cash, Philip Dekoninck, Elies and Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema 2020. Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding. Design Studies, Vol. 69, Issue. , p. 100943.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Nelson, Jacob and Menold, Jessica 2020. Opening the black box: Developing metrics to assess the cognitive processes of prototyping. Design Studies, Vol. 70, Issue. , p. 100964.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Masclet, C. Poulin, M. Boujut, J. F. and Becattini, N. 2020. Real-time coding method and tool for artefact-centric interaction analysis in co-design situations assisted by augmented reality. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 1141.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Gero, John S. and Milovanovic, Julie 2020. A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains. Design Science, Vol. 6, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Vieira, Sonia Gero, John S. Delmoral, Jessica Gattol, Valentin Fernandes, Carlos Parente, Marco and Fernandes, António A. 2020. The neurophysiological activations of mechanical engineers and industrial designers while designing and problem-solving. Design Science, Vol. 6, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kim, Yong Se and Park, Jung Ae 2021. Design Thinking in the Framework of Visual Thinking and Characterization of Service Design Ideation Methods Using Visual Reasoning Model. The Design Journal, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 931.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration
  • Volume 3
  • Laura Hay (a1), Alex H. B. Duffy (a1), Chris McTeague (a1), Laura M. Pidgeon (a2), Tijana Vuletic (a1) and Madeleine Grealy (a2)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration
  • Volume 3
  • Laura Hay (a1), Alex H. B. Duffy (a1), Chris McTeague (a1), Laura M. Pidgeon (a2), Tijana Vuletic (a1) and Madeleine Grealy (a2)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration
  • Volume 3
  • Laura Hay (a1), Alex H. B. Duffy (a1), Chris McTeague (a1), Laura M. Pidgeon (a2), Tijana Vuletic (a1) and Madeleine Grealy (a2)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.11
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.