Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:46:32.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Affective patterns in triadic family interactions: Associations with adolescent depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

Tom Hollenstein ,
Nicholas B. Allen  and
Lisa Sheeber
Tom Hollenstein*
Affiliation:
Queen's University
Nicholas B. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Lisa Sheeber
Affiliation:
Oregon Research Institute
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Tom Hollenstein, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada; E-mail: Tom.hollenstein@queensu.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Affective family processes are associated with the development of depression during adolescence. However, empirical description of these processes is generally based on examining affect at the individual or dyadic level. The purpose of this study was to examine triadic patterns of affect during parent–adolescent interactions in families with or without a depressed adolescent. We used state space grid analysis to characterize the state of all three actors simultaneously. Compared to healthy controls, triads with depressed adolescents displayed a wider range of affect, demonstrated less predictability of triadic affective sequences, spent more time in and returned more quickly to discrepant affective states, and spent less time in and returned more slowly to matched affective states, particularly while engaged in a problem-solving interaction. Furthermore, we identified seven unique triadic states in which triads with depressed adolescents spent significantly more time than triads with healthy controls. The present study enhances understanding of family affective processes related to depression by taking a more systemic approach and revealing triadic patterns that go beyond individual and dyadic analyses.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 85 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. B. (Ed.). (2008). Adolescent emotional development and the emergence of depressive disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Asarnow, J. R., Goldstein, M. J., Thompson, M., & Guthrie, D. (1993). One-year outcomes of depressive disorders in child psychiatric in-patients: Evaluation of the prognostic power of a brief measure of expressed emotion. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biglan, A., & Ary, D. V. (1990). Methodological issues in research on smoking prevention. In Bell, C. S. & Battjes, R. (Eds.), Prevention research: Deterring drug abuse among children and adolescents (NIDA Research Monograph Series, No. 63, pp. 170–195). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Buist, K. L., Dekovic, M., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2011). Dyadic family relationships and adolescent internalizing and externalizing problem behavior: Effects of positive and negative affect. Family Science, 2, 34–42.Google Scholar
Butler, E. A., Hollenstein, T., Shoham, V., & Rohrbaugh, M. J. (2013). A dynamic state-space analysis of interpersonal emotion regulation in couples who smoke. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:0265407513508732.Google Scholar
Butler, E. A., & Randall, A. K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210.Google Scholar
Cole, D. A., & Rehm, L. P. (1986). Family interaction patterns and childhood depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, E. M., El-Sheikh, M., Kouros, C. D., & Keller, P. S. (2007). Children's skin conductance reactivity as a mechanism of risk in the context of parental depressive symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 436–445.Google Scholar
Dalgleish, L. I. (1994). Discriminant analysis: Statistical inference using the jackknife and bootstrap procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. T., Hops, H., Alpert, A., & Sheeber, L. (1998). Child responses to parental conflict and their effect on adjustment: A study of triadic relations. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B., Sheeber, L., Hops, H., & Tildesley, E. (2000). Adolescent responses to depressive parental behaviors in problem-solving interactions: Implications for depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 451–465.Google Scholar
Diamond, G., Siqueland, L., & Diamond, G. M. (2003). Attachment-based family therapy for depressed adolescents: Programmatic treatment development. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., Winter, C., & Bullock, B. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651–663.Google Scholar
Ehrmantrout, N., Allen, N. B., Leve, C., Davis, B., & Sheeber, L. (2011). Adolescent recognition of parental affect: Influence of depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 628–634.Google Scholar
Emery, R. E. (1982). Interparental conflict and the children of discord and divorce. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 310–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The primary triangle: A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers, and infants. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Granic, I. (2000). The self-organization of parent-child relations: Beyond bidirectional models. In Lewis, M. D. & Granic, I. (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization (pp. 267–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 641–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2006). A survey of dynamic systems methods for developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 889–930). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Granic, I., & Lamey, A. V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother–child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 265–283.Google Scholar
Granic, I., O'Hara, A., Pepler, D., & Lewis, M. D. (2007). A dynamic systems analysis of parent–child changes associated with successful “real-world” interventions for aggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 845–857.Google Scholar
Hollenstein, T. (2007). State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollenstein, T. (2012). Using state space grids for understanding processes of change and stability in adolescence. In Kunnen, S. (Ed.), A dynamic systems approach to adolescent development. Studies in adolescent development (pp. 73–89). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hollenstein, T. (2013). State space grids. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollenstein, T., Granic, I., Stoolmiller, M., & Snyder, J. (2004). Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 595–607.Google Scholar
Hollenstein, T., & Lewis, M. D. (2006). A state space analysis of emotion and flexibility in parent-child interactions. Emotion, 6, 656–662.Google Scholar
Hollenstein, T., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Potworowski, G. (2013). A model of socioemotional flexibility at three time scales. Emotion Review, 5, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hops, H., Biglan, A., Tolman, A., Arthur, J., & Longoria, N. (1995). LIFE: Living in Family Environments coding system manual. Eugene, OR: Oregon Research Institute.Google Scholar
Jacobvitz, D., Hazen, N., Curran, M., & Hitchens, K. (2004). Observations of early triadic family interactions: Boundary disturbances in family predict symptoms of depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 577–592.Google Scholar
Joiner, T. E., & Coyne, J. C. (Eds.). (1999). The interactional nature of depression: Advances in interpersonal approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kane, P., & Garber, J. (2004). The relations among depression in fathers, children's psychopathology, and father–child conflict: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 339–360.Google Scholar
Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. B. (2010). Emotional inertia and psychological maladjustment. Psychological Science, 21, 984–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://statespacegrids.org Google Scholar
Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744–754.Google Scholar
Lavictoire, L. A., Snyder, J., Stoolmiller, M., & Hollenstein, T. (2012). Affective dynamics in triadic peer interactions in early childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 293–312.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 457–475.Google Scholar
Lindsey, E. W., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Campbell, J., Frabutt, J. M., & Lamb, M. E. (2002). Marital conflict and boys' peer relationships: The mediating role of mother–son emotional reciprocity. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 466–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunkenheimer, E. S., Hollenstein, T., Wang, J., & Shields, A. M. (2012). Flexibility and attractors in context: Family emotion socialization patterns and children's emotion regulation in late childhood. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 16, 269–291.Google Scholar
Lunkenheimer, E. S., Olson, S. L., Hollenstein, T., Sameroff, A. J., & Winter, C. (2011). Dyadic flexibility and positive affect in parent–child coregulation and the development of child behavior problems Development and Psychopathology, 23, 577–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmorstein, N. R., & Iacono, W. G. (2004). Major depression and conduct disorder in youth: Associations with parental psychopathology and parent–child conflict. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 377–386.Google Scholar
McCleary, L., & Sanford, M. (2002). Parental expressed emotion in depressed adolescents: Prediction of clinical course and relationship to comorbid disorders and social functioning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 587–595.Google Scholar
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oldehinkel, A. J., Veenstra, R., Ormel, J., de Winter, A. F., & Verhulst, F. C. (2006). Temperament, parenting, and depressive symptoms in a population sample of preadolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 684–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orvaschel, H., & Puig-Antich, J. (1994). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Epidemiologic Version-5 (K-SADS-E-5). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova Southeastern University.Google Scholar
Pincus, D. (2001). A framework and methodology for the study of nonlinear, self-organizing family dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, D., Ortega, D., & Metten, A. (2010). Orbital decomposition for the comparison of multiple categorical time-series. In Guastello, S. J. & Gregson, R. (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical systems analysis for the behavioral sciences: Real data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Restifo, K., & Bogels, S. (2009). Family processes in the development of youth depression: Translating the evidence to treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 294–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richters, J. E. (1997). The Hubble hypothesis and the developmentalist's dilemma. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 193–229.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 237–294). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sander, J. B., & McCarty, C. A. (2005). Youth depression in the family context: Familial risk factors and models of treatment. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 8, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, O. S., Dudgeon, P., Sheeber, L. B., Yap, M. B. H., Simmons, J. G., & Allen, N. B. (2011). Observer maternal responses to adolescent behavior predict the onset of major depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 331–338.Google Scholar
Schwartz, O. S., Sheeber, L. B., Dudgeon, P., & Allen, N. B. (2012). Emotion socialization within the family environment and adolescent depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication (Vol. 19, p. 1). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sheeber, L., Allen, N., Davis, B., & Sorensen, E. (2000). Regulation of negative affect during mother-child problem-solving interactions: Adolescent depressive status and family processes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheeber, L. B., Allen, N. B., Leve, C., Davis, B., Shortt, J. W., & Katz, L. F. (2009). Dynamics of affective experience and behavior in depressed adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 1419–1427.Google Scholar
Sheeber, L. B, Davis, B., Leve, C., Hops, H., & Tildesley, E. (2007). Adolescents' relationship with their mothers and fathers: Associations with depressive disorder and subdiagnostic symptomatology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 144–154.Google Scholar
Sheeber, L., Hops, H., Alpert, A., Davis, B., & Andrews, J. (1997). Family support and conflict: Prospective relations to adolescent depression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 333–344.Google Scholar
Sheeber, L., Hops, H., Andrews, J., Alpert, T., & Davis, B. (1998). Interactional processes in families with depressed and non-depressed adolescents: Reinforcement of depressive behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 417–427.Google Scholar
Sheeber, L., Hops, H., & Davis, B. (2001). Family processes in adolescent depression. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheeber, L., & Sorensen, E. (1998). Family relationships of depressed adolescents: A multimethod assessment. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 268–277.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56, 30–35.Google Scholar
Tremblay-Leveau, H., & Nadel, J. (1996). Exclusion in triads: Can it serve “meta-communicative” knowledge in 11- and 23-month-old children? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 145–158.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z., & Cohn, J. F. (1989). Infant–mother face-to-face interaction: Age and gender difference in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Development, 60, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kleef, G. A. (2010). The emerging view of emotion as social information. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 331–343.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, S., Emery, R. E., & Cassidy, J. (1988). Family members as third parties in dyadic family conflict: Strategies, alliances, and outcomes. Child Development, 59, 1293–1302.Google Scholar
Yap, M. B., Allen, N. B., & Ladouceur, C. D. (2008). Maternal socialization of positive affect: The impact of invalidation on adolescent emotion regulation and depressive symptomatology. Child Development, 79, 1415–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, M. B. H., Allen, N. B., O'Shea, M., Di Parsia, P., Simmons, J. G., & Sheeber, L. (2011). Early adolescents' temperament, emotion regulation during mother–child interactions, and depressive symptomatology. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 267–282.Google Scholar
Yap, M. B. H., Schwartz, O. S., Byrne, M. L., Simmons, J. G., & Allen, N. B. (2010). Maternal positive and negative interaction behaviors in early adolescents' depressive symptoms: Adolescent emotion regulation as a mediator. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 1014–1043.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hollenstein supplementary material

Table S1

Download Hollenstein supplementary material(File)
File 34.6 KB