Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:30:05.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fathering Through Change (FTC) intervention for single fathers: Preventing coercive parenting and child problem behaviors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2019

David S. DeGarmo  and
Jeremy A. Jones
David S. DeGarmo*
Affiliation:
Prevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Jeremy A. Jones
Affiliation:
Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
*
Author for Correspondence: David S. DeGarmo, Prevention Science Institute, 1600 Millrace, Suite 106, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-6217. Email: degarmo@uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dishion and Patterson's work on the unique role of fathers in the coercive family process showed that fathers' coercion explained twice the variance of mothers' in predicting children's antisocial behavior and how treatment and prevention of coercion and promotion of prosocial parenting can mitigate children's problem behaviors. Using these ideas, we employed a sample of 426 divorced or separated fathers randomly assigned to Fathering Through Change (FTC), an interactive online behavioral parent training program or to a waitlist control. Participating fathers had been separated or divorced within the past 24 months with children ages 4 to 12 years. We tested an intent to treat (ITT) mediation hypothesis positing that intervention-induced changes in child problem behaviors would be mediated by changes in fathers' coercive parenting. We also tested complier average causal effects (CACE) models to estimate intervention effects, accounting for compliers and noncompliers in the treatment group and would-be compliers in the controls. Mediation was supported. ITT analyses showed the FTC obtained a small direct effect on father-reported pre–post changes in child adjustment problems (d = .20), a medium effect on pre–post changes in fathers' coercive parenting (d = .61), and a moderate indirect effect to changes in child adjustment (d = .30). Larger effects were observed in CACE analyses.

Keywords

coerciondivorce and separationfathersparentingpreventive intervention
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 31 , Special Issue 5: Honoring the Contributions and Legacy of Thomas Dishion , December 2019 , pp. 1801 - 1811
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Baumel, A., Pawar, A., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2016). Digital parent training for children with disruptive behaviors: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 26, 740–749. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0048Google Scholar
Baumel, A., Pawar, A., Mathur, N., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2017). Technology-assisted parent training programs for children and adolescents with disruptive behaviors: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78, e957–e969. doi:10.4088/JCP.16r11063Google Scholar
Braver, S. L., Griffin, W. A., & Cookston, J. T. (2005). Prevention programs for divorced nonresident fathers. Family Court Review, 43, 81–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00009.xGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. C., Wang, W., Kellam, S. G., Muthén, B. O., Petras, H., Toyinbo, P., … Windham, A. (2008). Methods for testing theory and evaluating impact in randomized field trials: Intent-to-treat analyses for integrating the perspectives of person, place, and time. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S74–S104. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.11.013Google Scholar
Burns, G., & Patterson, D. R. (2000). Factor structure of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory: A parent rating scale of oppositional defiant behavior toward adults, inattentive behavior, and conduct problem behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 569–577. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_9Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
Chacko, A., Jensen, S., Lowry, L., Cornwell, M., Chimklis, A., Chan, E., … Pulgarin, B. (2016). Engagement in behavioral parent training: Review of the literature and implications for practice. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 19, 204–215. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2Google Scholar
Coley, R. L., & Medeiros, B. L. (2007). Reciprocal longitudinal relations between nonresident father involvement and adolescent delinquency. Child Development, 78, 132–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00989.xGoogle Scholar
Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., & Knox, V. (2010). Marriage and fatherhood programs. The Future of Children, 20, 205–230.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. (2007). An approach to preventing coparenting conflict and divorce in low-income families: Strengthening couple relationships and fostering fathers' involvement. Family Process, 46, 109–121. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00195.x.Google Scholar
Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., Pruett, M. K., Pruett, K., & Wong, J. J. (2009). Promoting fathers' engagement with children: Preventive interventions for low-income families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 663–679. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00625.xGoogle Scholar
DeGarmo, D. S. (2010). Coercive and prosocial fathering, antisocial personality, and growth in children's postdivorce noncompliance. Child Development, 81, 503–516. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01410.xGoogle Scholar
DeGarmo, D. S., & Forgatch, M. S. (2007). Efficacy of parent training for stepfathers: From playful spectator and polite stranger to effective stepfathering. Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/15295190701665631Google Scholar
DeGarmo, D. S., Nordahl, K. B., & Fabiano, G. A. (2016). Fathers and coercion dynamics in families. In Dishion, T. & Snyder, J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of coercive dynamics in close relationships: Implications for development, psychopathology and intervention science (pp. 114–128). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeGarmo, D. S., Reid, J. B., & Knutson, J. F. (2006). Direct laboratory observations and analog measures in research definitions of child maltreatment. In Feerick, M. M., Knutson, J. F., Trickett, P. K., & Flanzer, S. M. (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect: Definitions, classifications, & a framework for research (pp. 293–328). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Forgatch, M., Chamberlain, P., & Pelham, W. E. III. (2016). The Oregon model of behavior family therapy: From intervention design to promoting large-scale system change. Behavior Therapy, 47, 812–837. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.002Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (Vol. 2, pp. 421–471). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Owen, L. D., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Like father, like son: Toward a developmental model for the transmission of male deviance across generations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 105–126. doi:10.1080/17405620444000094Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D., Connell, A., Gardner, F., Weaver, C., & Wilson, M. (2008). The Family Check-Up with high-risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents' positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Development, 79, 1395–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.xGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Snyder, J. (Eds.). (2016). Oxford handbook of coercive dynamics in close relationships: Implications for development, psychopathology and intervention science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Stormshak, E. A. (2007). Intervening in children's lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., Cheng, H., O'Connor, T. G., & Bridges, L. (2004). Children's perspectives on their relationships with their nonresident fathers: Influences, outcomes and implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 553–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00245.xGoogle Scholar
Emery, R. E., Laumann-Billings, L., Waldron, M. C., Sbarra, D. A., & Dillon, P. (2001). Child custody mediation and litigation: Custody, contact, and coparenting 12 years after initial dispute resolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 323–332. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.323Google Scholar
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.Google Scholar
Fabiano, G. A. (2007). Father participation in behavioral parent training for ADHD: Review and recommendations for increasing inclusion and engagement. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 683–693. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.683Google Scholar
Fabricius, W. V., & Braver, S. L. (2006) Relocation, parent conflict, and domestic violence: Independent risk factors for children of divorce. Journal of Child Custody, 3, 7–27. doi: 10.1300/J190v03n03_02Google Scholar
Fabricius, W. V., & Luecken, L. J. (2007). Postdivorce living arrangements, parent conflict, and long-term physical health correlates for children of divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 195–205. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.195Google Scholar
Ford, T., Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., Goodman, A., & Goodman, R. (2009). Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire added value scores: Evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventions. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 552–558. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052373Google Scholar
Forgatch, M. S. (1994). Parenting through change: A programmed intervention curriculum for groups of single mothers. Eugene, OR: Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective parenting training program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.711Google Scholar
Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2002). Extending and testing the social interaction learning model with divorce samples. In Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Snyder, J. (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention (pp. 235–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Frank, T. J., Keown, L. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Enhancing father engagement and interparental teamwork in an evidence-based parenting intervention: A randomized-controlled trial of outcomes and processes. Behavior Therapy, 46, 749–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.008Google Scholar
Gearing, R. E., Colvin, G., Popova, S., & Regehr, C. (2008). Re:Membering fatherhood: Evaluating the impact of a group intervention on fathering. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 33, 22–42. doi: 10.1080/01933920701798539Google Scholar
Graham, J. W. (2003). Adding missing-data-relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 80–100. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_4Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 98, 39–57. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001Google Scholar
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8Google Scholar
Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J. M., Put, C. E., Dubas, J. S., Laan, P. H., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2012). A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 771–785. doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9608-1Google Scholar
Jaffee, S. R., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Taylor, A. (2003). Life with (or without) father: The benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father's antisocial behavior. Child Development, 74, 109–126. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00524Google Scholar
Jo, B. (2002). Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: Alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 385–409. doi: 10.3102/10769986027004385Google Scholar
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.115Google Scholar
King, V., & Sobolewski, J. M. (2006) Nonresident fathers’ contributions to adolescent well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 537–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00274.xGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, H., Kiernan, M., Essex, M., & Kupfer, D. J. (2008). How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 27, S101–S108. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S101Google Scholar
Leidy, M. S., Schofield, T. J., & Parke, R. D. (2013). Fathers' contributions to children's social development. In Cabrera, N. J. & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Little, R. J., & Yau, L. H. Y. (1998). Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: Treatment of no-shows using Rubin's Causal Model. Psychological Methods, 3, 147–159. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.147Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64Google Scholar
McIntosh, J. E., Wells, Y. D., Smyth, B. M., & Long, C. M. (2008). Child-focused and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of postseparation adjustment. Family Court Review, 46, 105–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00186.xGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2018). Mplus user's guide. (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castilia.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (2005). The next generation of PMTO models. Behavior Therapist, 28, 25–32.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Chamberlain, P. (1994). A functional analysis of parent resistance during parent training therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 53–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1994.tb00006.xGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1988). Multilevel family process models: Traits, interactions, and relationships. In Hinde, R. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.), Relationships and families: Mutual influences (pp. 283–310). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2010). Cascading effects following intervention. Development & Psychopathology, 22(Special Issue 04), 949–970. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000568Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). A social interactional approach: Antisocial boys (Vol. 4). Eugene, OR: Castilla.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–737. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879Google Scholar
Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Snyder, J. (2002). Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. S., Forgatch, M. S., Fishbein, D. H., & Sandler, I. N. (2018). Editorial: The life and contributions of Thomas Dishion. Prevention Science, 19(7), 849–852. doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0934-1Google Scholar
Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., Beaman, J., & Conger, R. D. (1994) The impact of mothers’ parenting, involvement by nonresidential fathers, and parental conflict on the adjustment of adolescent children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 356–374. doi: 10.2307/353105Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 30(3), 283–302. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3003_2Google Scholar