Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:58:43.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aggression, hostile attributions, status, and gender: A continued quest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Antonius H. N. Cillessen ,
Tessa A. M. Lansu  and
Yvonne H. M. Van Den Berg
Antonius H. N. Cillessen*
Affiliation:
Radboud University
Tessa A. M. Lansu
Affiliation:
Radboud University
Yvonne H. M. Van Den Berg
Affiliation:
Radboud University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Antonius H. N. Cillessen, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands; E-mail: a.cillessen@psych.ru.nl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study had two goals. The first goal was to examine the association between two indicators of negative bias in children and their associations with children's aggression. The second goal was to examine a possible dual role of social status, operationalized as popularity, as a concurrent correlate of negative bias and as a moderator of the effect of negative bias on children's aggression. The roles of gender and type of aggression were also examined. Participants were 366 fifth- and sixth-grade children (49% girls; Mage = 11.07 years, SD = 0.85 year) who completed peer- and self-report measures in their classrooms. The results showed that the two indicators of negative bias were associated with each other and with children's aggression. Popularity was weakly associated with negative bias. However, popularity did moderate the association of hostile attributions with aggression. The associations of both measures of negative bias with aggression also varied by gender, with stronger associations for boys than for girls. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 26 , Special Issue 3: The Legacy of Nicki R. Crick's Contributions to Developmental Psychopathology , August 2014 , pp. 635 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bellmore, A. D. (2010). Social skills and social competence in interactions with peers. In Smith, P. K. & Hart, C. H. (Eds.), The Wiley–Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed., pp. 393–412). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In S. R., Asher & Coie, J. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 365–401). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In Asher, S. R. & Coie, J. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R. (2007, March). Aggression in peer relations. Discussion presented at the Peer Relations Preconference of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social-information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and psychically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73, 1134–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, B. O., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 1467–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., & Crick, N. R. (1990). Social information-processing bases of aggressive behavior in children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51, 1–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, P., & Asher, S. R. (1987, August). Aggressive-rejected children's attributional biases about liked and disliked peers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132.Google Scholar
Lansu, T. A. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2013). Implicit and explicit peer evaluation: Associations with early adolescents’ prosociality, aggression, and bullying. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 762–771.Google Scholar
Lansu, T. A. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Karremans, J. C. (2012). Implicit associations with popularity in early adolescence: An approach–avoidance analysis. Developmental Psychology, 48, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children's social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109.Google Scholar
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.Google Scholar
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 473–485.Google Scholar
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387.Google Scholar
Shure, M. B., & Spivack, G. (1979). Interpersonal cognitive problem solving and primary prevention: Programming for preschool and kindergarten children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 8, 89–94.Google Scholar
Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S. M., Oldehinkel, A. J., de Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar