Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:52:21.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effortful control as a moderator of the relation between contextual risk factors and growth in adjustment problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2008

Liliana J. Lengua ,
Nicole R. Bush ,
Anna C. Long ,
Erica A. Kovacs  and
Anika M. Trancik
Liliana J. Lengua*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Nicole R. Bush
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Anna C. Long
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Erica A. Kovacs
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Anika M. Trancik
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Liliana Lengua, University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195; E-mail: liliana@u.washington.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effortful control was examined as a moderator of the relations of three domains of contextual risk factors to growth in internalizing and externalizing problems in a community sample (N = 189) of children (8–12 years at Time 1). Socioeconomic, maternal, and environmental risk factors were examined as predictors of initial levels and growth in children's adjustment problems across 3 years. The effects of the risk factors depended on children's level of effortful control. For children lower in effortful control, socioeconomic risk was related to significantly higher initial levels of internalizing and externalizing problems and decreases over time. However, children lower in effortful control had higher levels of problems at all three time points than children higher in effortful control. Maternal risk was associated with increases in internalizing for children lower in effortful control, and environmental risk was related to increases in internalizing and externalizing problems for children lower in effortful control, but not those higher in effortful control. Children who were lower in effortful control appeared to experience more adverse effects of contextual risk than those higher in effortful control, suggesting that interventions aimed at improving children's effortful control might serve to protect children from increased risk of adjustment problems associated with contextual risk factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 509 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Support for this research was provided by NIMH Grant R29MH57703. The authors thank the families who participated in this study and acknowledge Craig Colder for his contribution to this manuscript.

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Biesanz, J.C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845–876.Google Scholar
Bird, H. R., Gould, M. S., & Staghezza, B. M. (1993). Patterns of diagnostic comorbidity in a community sample of children aged 9 through 16 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 361–368.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Lerner, R. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buckner, J. C., Mezzacappa, E., & Beardslee, W. R. (2003). Characteristics of resilient youths living in poverty: The role of self-regulatory processes. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, K. B., Van Dulmen, M., Carlivati, J., Egeland, B., Sroufe, A., Forman, D. R., et al. (2005). Mediating links between maternal depression and offspring psychopathology: The importance of independent data. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 490–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capaldi, D. M. (1991). Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: I. Family factors and general adjustment at grade 6. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capaldi, D. M., & Rothbart, M. K. (1992). Development and validation of an early adolescent temperament measure. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1995). Technical report of the scale construction for the Neighborhood Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Cook, W. L., & Goldstein, M. J. (1993). Multiple perspectives on family relationships: A latent variables model. Child Development, 64, 1377–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coplan, R. J., Bowker, A., & Cooper, S. M. (2003). Parenting daily hassles, child temperament and social adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18, 376–395.Google Scholar
Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., Wyman, P. A., Parker, G. R., Wannon, M., & Gribble, P. (1992). Test comparisons among stress-affected, stress-resilient, and nonclassified fourth through sixth grade urban children. Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 200–214.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J., & Willoughby, M. T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 220–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1998). Multiple risk factors in the development of externalizing behavior problems: Group and individual differences. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1996). Regulatory processes and the development of cognitive representations. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 633–652.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1990). Mechanisms in the cycle of violence. Science, 250, 1678–1683.Google Scholar
Downey, G., & Coyne, J. (1990). Children of depressed parents: An intergrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 50–76.Google Scholar
Dubow, E. F., & Ippolito, M. F. (1994). Effects of poverty and quality of the home environment no changes in the academic and behavioral adjustment of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebenov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Development, 65, 296–318.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136–157.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Karbon, M., & Murphy, B. C. (1996). The relations of children's dispositional prosocial behavior to emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Child Development, 67, 974–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Smith, M., & Maszk, P. (1996). The relations of children's dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 195–209.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Fabes, R. A., Smith, C. L., Reiser, M., Shepard, S. A., et al. (2003). The relations of effortful control and ego control to children's resiliency and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 39, 761–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, G. H., & Caspi, A. (1988). Economic stress in lives: Developmental perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W. (2003). A multimethodological analysis of cumulative risk and allostatic load among rural children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 924–933.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W., & English, K. (2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development, 73, 1238–1248.Google Scholar
Gartstein, M. A., Fagot, B. I. (2003). Parental depression, parenting and family adjustment, and child effortful control: Explaining externalizing behaviors for preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 143–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, C. J. (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test. A manual for clinical and experimental uses. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting Company.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. H., & Gotlieb, I. H. (2002). Children of depressed parents: Mechanisms of risk and implications for treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. T., Lengua, L. J., Coie, J. D., Pinderhughes, E. E., Bierman, K, Dodge, K. A., et al. (1999). Predicting developmental outcomes at school entry using a multiple-risk model: Four American communities. Developmental Psychology, 35, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammen, C., Brennan, P. A., & Shih, J. H. (2004). Family discord and stress predictors of depression and other disorders in adolescent children of depressed and nondepressed women. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 994–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Fegley, S. (2003). Personality and development in childhood: A person-centered approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(Serial No. 272).Google ScholarPubMed
Hinshaw, S. P., & Park, T. (1999). Research problems and issues: Toward a more definitive science of disruptive behavior disorders. In Quay, H. C. & Hogan, A. E. (Eds.), Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders (pp. 593–620). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, W. T. (2000). Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it? Psychological Methods, 5, 64–86.Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, J., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Taylor, A. (2004). Genetic and environmental processes in young children's resilience and vulnerability to socioeconomic deprivation. Child Development, 75, 651–668.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G. (1997). Multiple pathways to conscience for children with different temperaments: From toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology, 33, 228–240.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., Jacques, T. Y., Koenig, A. L., & Vandegeest, K. A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Development, 67, 490–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacs, M., (1981). Rating scales to assess depression in school aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatry, 46, 305–315.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J. (2002). The contribution of emotionality and self-regulation to the understanding of children's response to multiple risk. Child Development, 73, 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengua, L. J. (2003). Associations among emotionality, self-regulation, adjustment problems and positive adjustment in middle childhood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 595–618.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Honorado, E., & Bush, N. (2007). Cumulative risk and parenting as predictors of effortful control and social competence in preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., & Long, A. C. (2002). The role of emotionality and self-regulation in the appraisal-coping process: Tests of direct and moderating effects. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 471–493.Google Scholar
Lengua, L. J., Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., & West, S. G. (2000). The additive and interactive effects of temperament and parenting in predicting adjustment problems of children of divorce. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 232–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liaw, F., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1994). Cumulative familial risks and low birth weight children's cognitive and behavioral development. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 360–372.Google Scholar
Lupien, S. J., King, S., Meaney, M. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2001). Can poverty get under your skin? Basal cortisol levels and cognitive function in children from low and high socioeconomic status. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 653–676.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., Wikstrom, P. H., Loeber, R., & Novak, S. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context on offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmazy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.Google Scholar
McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsky, A. F. (1996). Disorders of attention: A neuropsychological perspective. In Lyon, G. R., Reid, G., & Krasnegor, N. A. (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 71–95). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Sessa, F. M., Avenevoli, S., & Essex, M. J. (2002). Temperamental vulnerability and negative parenting as interacting predictors of child adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 461–471.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L., Sameroff, A. J., Kerr, D. C., Lopez, N. L., & Wellman, H. M. (2005). Developmental foundations of externalizing problems in young children: The role of effortful control. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2000). Developing mechanisms of self-regulation. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 6, 271–280.Google Scholar
Rice, F., Harold, & G. T., Thapar, A. (2002). Assessing the effects of age, sex and shared environment on the genetic aetiology of depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1039–1051.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K. (1989). Temperament in childhood: A framework. In Kohnstamm, G., Bates, J., & Rothbart, M. K. (Eds.), Handbook of temperament in childhood (pp. 59–73). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E., (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Hershey, K. L. (1994). Temperament and social behavior in childhood. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 40, 21–39.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72, 1394–1408.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (1995). Emotionality, emotion regulation, and preschoolers' social adaptation. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 49–62.Google Scholar
Salmon, K., & Pereira, J. K. (2002). Predicting children's response to an invasive medical investigation: The influence of effortful control and parent behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 227–233.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Barocas, R., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: Social–environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1994). Urban poverty and the family context of delinquency: A new look at structure and process in a classic study. Child Development, 65, 523–540.Google Scholar
Saylor, C. F., Finch, A. J., Spirito, A., & Bennett, B. (1984). The Children's Depression Inventory: A systematic evaluation of psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 955–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, D. S., Keenan, K., & Vondra, J. (1994). Developmental precursors of externalizing behavior: Ages 1 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 30, 355–364.Google Scholar
Strelau, J. (1995). Temperament and stress: Temperament as a moderator of stressors, emotional states, coping, and costs. In Spielberger, C., Sarason, I., Brebner, J. M. T., Greenglass, E., Laungani, P., & O'Roark, A. M. (Eds.), Stress and emotion: Anxiety, anger and curiosity (Vol. 15, pp. 215–254). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Tein, J., Roosa, M. W., & Michaels, M. (1994). Agreement between parent and child reports on parental behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 341–355.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., Bierman, J. M., & French, F. E. (1971). The children of Kauai: A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Wertlieb, O., Weigel, C., Springer, T., & Feldstein, M. (1988). Temperament as a moderator of children's stressful experiences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 234–245.Google Scholar
Winsler, A., De Leon, J. R., Carlton, M., Barry, M., Jenkins, T., & Carter, K. L. (April, 1997). Components of self-regulation in the preschool years: Developmental stability, validity, and relationships to classroom behavior. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child DevelopmentWashington, DC.Google Scholar
Wyman, P. A., Cowen, E. L., Work, W. C., & Parker, G. R. (1991). Developmental and family milieu correlates of resilience in urban children who have experienced major life stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 405–426.Google Scholar