Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:50:16.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gene–environment interaction between peer victimization and child aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2008

Mara Brendgen ,
Michel Boivin ,
Frank Vitaro ,
Alain Girard ,
Ginette Dionne  and
Daniel Pérusse
Mara Brendgen*
Affiliation:
University of Québec at Montreal
Michel Boivin
Affiliation:
Laval University
Frank Vitaro
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Alain Girard
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Ginette Dionne
Affiliation:
Laval University
Daniel Pérusse
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Mara Brendgen, Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, CP 8888, Succ. Centreville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada; E-mail: Brendgen.Mara@uqam.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although peer victimization places children at serious risk for aggressive behavior, not all victimized children are aggressive. The diathesis–stress hypothesis of disease proposes that an environmental stressor such as peer victimization should to lead to maladjustment mostly in those individuals with preexisting genetic vulnerabilities. Accordingly, this study examined whether the link between peer victimization and child aggression is moderated by children's genetic risk for such behavior. Using a sample of 506 6-year-old twins, peer victimization was assessed through peer nominations and aggressive behavior was assessed through peer and teacher reports. Children's genetic risk for aggression was estimated as a function of their co-twin's aggression and the pair's zygosity. Genetic modeling showed that peer victimization is an environmentally driven variable that is unrelated to children's genetic disposition. Results also provided support for the notion of a gene–environment interaction between peer victimization and child's genetic risk for aggressive behavior, albeit only in girls. For boys, peer victimization was related to aggression regardless of the child's genetic risk for such behavior. Different socialization experiences in girls' compared to boys' peer groups may explain the different pattern of results for girls and boys.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 455 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was made possible by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Fonds Concerté pour l'Aide à la Recherche, the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec. We thank the participating families, and the authorities and directors as well as the teachers of the participating schools. We also thank Bernadette Simoneau, Jacqueline Langlois, and Hélène Paradis for their assistance in data management and preparation, and Jocelyn Malo for coordinating the data collection.

References

Alsaker, F., & Brunner, A. (1999). Switzerland. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andrieu, N., & Goldstein, A. M. (1998). Epidemiologic and genetic approaches in the study of gene–environment interaction: An overview of available methods. Epidemiologic Reviews, 20, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behar, L., & Stringfield, S. (1974). A behavior rating scale for the preschool child. Developmental Psychology, 10, 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brendgen, M., Dionne, G., Girard, A., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Pérusse, D. (2005). Examining genetic and environmental effects on social aggression: A study of 6-year-old twins. Child Development, 76, 930–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brendgen, M., Markiewicz, D., Doyle, A. B., & Bukowski, W. M. (2001). The relations between friendship quality, ranked-friendship preference, and adolescents' behavior with their friends. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 47, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., & Pérusse, D. (2006). Genetic and environmental effects on reactive versus proactive aggression. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1299–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadoret, R. J., Leve, L. D., & Devor, E. (1997). Genetics of aggressive and violent behavior. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20, 301–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Meerum Terwogt, M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33, 579–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, W., Wang, T., Goldbaum, S., Peters, R., & Silverman, R. (2000). Understanding risk and protective factors in bullying and victimization among Canadian children and adolescents. Ottawa, Canada: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada.Google Scholar
Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2003). The development of psychopathology in females and males: Current progress and future challenges. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 719–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denton, K., & Zarbatany, L. (1996). Age differences in support processes in conversations between friends. Child Development, 67, 1360–1373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiLalla, L. F. (2002). Behavior genetics of aggression in children: Review and future directions. Developmental Review, 22, 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex: Longman Scientific and Technical.Google Scholar
Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Victimization by peers: Associations with children's reports of mother–child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forget-Dubois, N., Perusse, D., Turecki, G., Girard, A., Billette, J. M., Rouleau, G., et al. (2003). Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: Parent report, DNA analysis, and chorionicity. Twin Research, 6, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genta, M. L., Mensini, E., Fonzi, A., & Constabile, A. (1996). Bullies and victims in schools in central and southern Italy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H. (1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note. Behavior Genetics, 21, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, S. E., Tisak, M. S., & Boxer, P. (2002). Preschoolers' normative and prescriptive judgments about relational and overt aggression. Early Education and Development, 13, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2002). Peer victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happonen, M., Pulkkinen, L., Kaprio, J., Van der Meere, J., Viken, R. J., & Rose, R. J. (2002). The heritability of depressive symptoms: Multiple informants and multiple measures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Dodge, K. A., Rutter, M., Taylor, A., et al. (2005). Nature × nurture: Genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Polo-Tomas, M., Price, T. S., & Taylor, A. (2004). The limits of child effects: Evidence for genetically mediated child effects on corporal punishment but not on physical maltreatment. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1047–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105–124). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Eaves, L. J. (1986). Models for the joint effect of genotype and environment on liability to psychiatric illness. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 279–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S., Kessler, R. C., Walters, E. E., & MacLean, C. (1995). Stressful life events, genetic liability, and onset of an episode of major depression in women. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 833–842.Google ScholarPubMed
Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). Victimized children's responses to peers' aggression: Behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression: A rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 51, 964–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, D. R., & Carey, G. (1997). Genetic and environmental architecture of human aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis–stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 406–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morita, Y., Soeda, H., Soeada, K., & Taki, M. (1999). Japan. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus user's guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Nansel, T., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R., Ruan, W., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying Behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R. S., & Murray, B. J. (2005). How students and teachers view the seriousness of peer harassment: When is it appropriate to seek help? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olweus, D. (1992). Victimization among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In Albee, G. W., Bond, L. A., & Monsey, T. V. C. (Eds.), Improving children's lives: Global perspectives on prevention. Primary prevention of psychopathology (pp. 279–295). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ortega, R., & Mora-Merchan, J. (1999). Spain. In Smith, P. I., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ottman, R. (1994). Epidemiologic analysis of gene–environment interaction in twins. Genetic Epidemiology, 11, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipsen, L. C. L. (1999). Associations between age, gender, and group acceptance and three components of friendship quality. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 438–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, S., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 490–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, F., Harold, G., & Thapar, A. (2002). The genetic aetiology of childhood depression: A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, K. (1998). The relationship between reported health and involvement in bully/victim problems among male and female secondary schoolchildren. Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., & Silberg, J. (2002). Gene–environment interplay in relation to emotional and behavioral disturbance. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 463–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 465–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaras, K., Kelly, P. J., Chiano, M. N., Spector, T. D., & Campbell, L. V. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on total-body and central abdominal fat: The effect of physical activity in female twins. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 130, 873–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SantéQuébec, Jetté, M., Desrosiers, H., & Tremblay, R. E. (1998). “In 2001 … I'll be 5 years old!” Survey of 5-month old infants. Preliminary report of the Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Québec. Quebec: Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1997). The early socialization of aggressive victims of bullying. Child Development, 68, 665–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2000). Friendship as a moderating factor in the pathway between early harsh home environment and later victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 36, 646–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Peer group victimization as a predictor of children's behavior problems at home and in school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P. K., Madsen, K. C., & Moody, J. C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Thapar, A., & McGuffin, P. (1995). Are anxiety symptoms in childhood heritable? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development 76, 1072–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une methodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue francaise [Toward a methodology for the transcultural validation of psychological questionnaires: Implications for research in the French language]. Canadian Psychology, 30, 662–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Valk, J. C., van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Verhulst, F. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2003). Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change in children's internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 1212–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vettenburg, N. (1999). Belgium. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., & Slee, P. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vitaro, F., Gagnon, C., & Tremblay, R. E. (1990). Predicting stable peer rejection from kindergarten to grade one. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Gagnon, C. (1990). Profil comportemental et stabilité du statut sociométrique de la maternelle à la première année [Behavioral profile and stability of sociometric status from kindergarten to 1st grade]. Enfance, 45, 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Gagnon, C., & Boivin, M. (1992). Peer rejection from kindergarten to Grade 2: Outcomes, correlates, and prediction. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly 38, 382–400.Google Scholar
Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Kerr, M., Pagani, L., & Bukowski, W. M. (1997). Disruptiveness, friends' characteristics, and delinquency in early adolescence: A test of two competing models of development. Child Development, 68, 676–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, M. (1999). Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar