Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:18:13.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infant negative reactivity defines the effects of parent–child synchrony on physiological and behavioral regulation of social stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2015

Maayan Pratt ,
Magi Singer ,
Yaniv Kanat-Maymon  and
Ruth Feldman
Maayan Pratt
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
Magi Singer
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
Yaniv Kanat-Maymon
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinarty Center, Herzilia, Israel
Ruth Feldman*
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ruth Feldman, Department of Psychology and the Gonda Brain Sciences Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel; E-mail: feldman@mail.biu.ac.il.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How infants shape their own development has puzzled developmentalists for decades. Recent models suggest that infant dispositions, particularly negative reactivity and regulation, affect outcome by determining the extent of parental effects. Here, we used a microanalytic experimental approach and proposed that infants with varying levels of negative reactivity will be differentially impacted by parent–infant synchrony in predicting physiological and behavioral regulation of increasing social stress during an experimental paradigm. One hundred and twenty-two mother–infant dyads (4–6 months) were observed in the face-to-face still face (SF) paradigm and randomly assigned to three experimental conditions: SF with touch, standard SF, and SF with arms’ restraint. Mother–infant synchrony and infant negative reactivity were observed at baseline, and three mechanisms of behavior regulation were microcoded; distress, disengagement, and social regulation. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia baseline, reactivity, and recovery were quantified. Structural equation modeling provided support for our hypothesis. For physiological regulation, infants high in negative reactivity receiving high mother–infant synchrony showed greater vagal withdrawal, which in turn predicted comparable levels of vagal recovery to that of nonreactive infants. In behavioral regulation, only infants low in negative reactivity who received high synchrony were able to regulate stress by employing social engagement cues during the SF phase. Distress was reduced only among calm infants to highly synchronous mothers, and disengagement was lowest among highly reactive infants experiencing high mother–infant synchrony. Findings chart two pathways by which synchrony may bolster regulation in infants of high and low reactivity. Among low reactive infants, synchrony builds a social repertoire for handling interpersonal stress, whereas in highly reactive infants, it constructs a platform for repeated reparation of momentary interactive “failures” and reduces the natural tendency of stressed infants to disengage from source of distress. Implications for the construction of synchrony-focused interventions targeting infants of varying dispositions are discussed.

Type
Special Section Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 27 , Issue 4pt1 , November 2015 , pp. 1191 - 1204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abidin, R. R. (1990). Parenting Stress Index (PSI). Odessa, FL: Pediatric Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy, 4, 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Apter-Levy, Y., Feldman, M., Vakart, A., Ebstein, R. P., & Feldman, R. (2013). Impact of maternal depression across the first 6 years of life on the child's mental health, social engagement, and empathy: The moderating role of oxytocin. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 1161–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbuckle, J. L. (2009). Amos 18 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
Bates, J. E., Freeland, C. A. B., & Lounsbury, M. L. (1979). Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development, 50, 794–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazhenova, O. V, Plonskaia, O., & Porges, S. W. (2001). Vagal reactivity and affective adjustment in infants during interaction challenges. Child Development, 72, 1314–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, B., Lachmann, F., Jaffe, J., Markese, S., Buck, K. A., Chen, H., et al. (2012). Maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and 4-month mother-infant interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 29, 383–407. doi:10.1037/a0029387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, B., Steele, M., Jaffe, J., Buck, K. A., Chen, H., Cohen, P., et al. (2011). Maternal anxiety symptoms and mother-infant self- and interactive contingency. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 174–206. doi:10.1002/imhj.20274 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908. doi:10.1037/a0017376 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013). Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4, Part 2), 1243–1261. doi:10.1017/S095457941300059X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braungart-Rieker, J. M., Garwood, M. M., Powers, B. P., & Wang, X. (2014). Parental sensitivity, infant affect, and affect regulation: Predictors of later attachment. Child Development, 72, 252–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 230–258.Google Scholar
Burgess, K. B., Marshall, P. J., Rubin, K. H., & Fox, N. A. (2003). Infant attachment and temperament as predictors of subsequent externalizing problems and cardiac physiology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 44, 819–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calkins, S. D., Graziano, P. A., & Keane, S. P. (2007). Cardiac vagal regulation differentiates among children at risk for behavior problems. Biological Psychology, 74, 144–153. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J., & Ehlert, U. (2012). Acute psychosocial stress: Does the emotional stress response correspond with physiological responses? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 1111–1134. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.12.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerezo, M. A., Pons-Salvador, G., & Trenado, R. M. (2008). Mother-infant interaction and children's socio-emotional development with high- and low-risk mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 578–589. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.07.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. L., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994). Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, J. F., & Tronick, E. Z. (1983). Three-month-old infants’ reaction to simulated maternal depression. Child Development, 54, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockenberg, S. C., Leerkes, E. M., & Bárrig Jó, P. S. (2008). Predicting aggressive behavior in the third year from infant reactivity and regulation as moderated by maternal behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 37–54. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000023 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degnan, K. A., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Behavioral inhibition and anxiety disorders: Multiple levels of a resilience process. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 729–746. doi:10.1017/S0954579407000363 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denham, S. A., Workman, E., Cole, P. M., Weissbrod, C., Kendziora, K. T., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2000). Prediction of externalizing behavior problems from early to middle childhood: The role of parental socialization and emotion expression. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A., McClenny, B. D., & Porges, S. W. (2001). Neonatal cardiac vagal tone and school-age developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 38, 56–66.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2006). From biological rhythms to social rhythms: Physiological precursors of mother-infant synchrony. Developmental Psychology, 42, 175–188. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.175 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2007a). On the origins of background emotions: From affect synchrony to symbolic expression. Emotion, 7, 601–611. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.601 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2007b). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing: Physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 48, 329–354. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2007c). Parent-infant synchrony: Biological foundations and developmental outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 340–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00532.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2008). The intrauterine environment, temperament, and development: Including the biological foundations of individual differences in the study of psychopathology and wellness. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 233–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2009). The development of regulatory functions from birth to 5 years: Insights from premature infants. Child Development, 80, 544–561. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01278.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. (2012). Bio-behavioral synchrony: A model for integrating biological and microsocial behavioral processes in the study of parenting. Parenting, 12, 154–164. doi:10.1080/15295192.2012.683342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. (2015). Sensitive periods in human social development: New insights from research on oxytocin, synchrony, and high-risk parenting. Development and Psychopathology. Advance online publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Dollberg, D., & Nadam, R. (2011). The expression and regulation of anger in toddlers: Relations to maternal behavior and mental representations. Infant Behavior & Development, 34, 310–320. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.02.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2004). Parent–infant synchrony and the social-emotional development of triplets. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1133–1147. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1133 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2007). Maternal postpartum behavior and the emergence of infant-mother and infant-father synchrony in preterm and full-term infants: The role of neonatal vagal tone. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 290–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2009). Biological and environmental initial conditions shape the trajectories of cognitive and social-emotional development across the first years of life. Developmental Science, 12, 194–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00761.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Gordon, I., Influs, M., Gutbir, T., & Ebstein, R. P. (2013). Parental oxytocin and early caregiving jointly shape children's oxytocin response and social reciprocity. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, 1154–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Gordon, I., & Zagoory-Sharon, O. (2010). The cross-generation transmission of oxytocin in humans. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 669–676. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1997). Affect regulation and synchrony in mother-infant play as precursors to the development of symbolic competence. Infant Mental Health Journal, 18, 4–23.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C. W., Mayes, L. C., & Erlich, S. H. (1997). Change in mother-infant interactive behavior: Relations to change in the mother, the infant, and the social context. Infant Behavior and Development, 20, 151–163. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90018-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R., Greenbaum, C. W., & Yirmiya, N. (1999). Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecend of the emergence of self control. Developmental Psychology, 35, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Rosenthal, Z., & Eidelman, A. I. (2014). Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Singer, M., & Zagoory, O. (2010). Touch attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science, 13, 271–278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00890.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, T., Healy, B. T., Goldstein, S., & Guthertz, M. (1990). Behavior-state matching and synchrony in mother-infant interactions of nondepressed versus depressed dyads. Developmental Psychology, 26, 7–14. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences 1. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, T. I., Fox, N. A., Pine, D. S., Walker, O. L., Degnan, K. A., & Chronis-Tuscano, A. (2015). Early childhood behavioral inhibition, adult psychopathology and the buffering effects of adolescent social networks: A twenty-year prospective study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, R., & Feldman, R. (2008). A neurobiological model for the effects of early brainstem functioning on the development of behavior and emotion regulation in infants: Implications for prenatal and perinatal risk. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 49, 1031–1041. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01918.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graziano, P., & Derefinko, K. (2013). Cardiac vagal control and children's adaptive functioning: A meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 94, 22–37. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.011 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grienenberger, J. F., Kelly, K., & Slade, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, mother-infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 299–311. doi:10.1080/14616730500245963 Google ScholarPubMed
Ham, J., & Tronick, E. (2006). Infant resilience to the stress of the still-face: Infant and maternal psychophysiology are related. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 297–302. doi:10.1196/annals.1376.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hane, A. A., Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., & Marshall, P. J. (2009). Behavioral reactivity and approach-withdrawal bias in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1491–1496. doi:10.1037/a0012855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrist, A. W., & Waugh, R. M. (2002). Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children's development. Developmental Review, 22, 555–592. doi:10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00500-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, P. D., Nuselovici, J. N., Utendale, W. T., Coutya, J., McShane, K. E., & Sullivan, C. (2008). Applying the polyvagal theory to children's emotion regulation: Social context, socialization, and adjustment. Biological Psychology, 79, 299–306. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.07.005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. L., Degnan, K. A., Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2006). Profiles of externalizing behavior problems for boys and girls across preschool: The roles of emotion regulation and inattention. Developmental Psychology, 42, 913–928. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.913 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofer, M. A. (1995). Hidden regulators. Attachment theory: Social, developmental and clinical perspectives (pp. 203–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Holochwost, S. J., Gariépy, J.-L., Propper, C. B., Mills-Koonce, W. R., & Moore, G. A. (2014). Parenting behaviors and vagal tone at six months predict attachment disorganization at twelve months. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 1423–1430. doi:10.1002/dev.21221 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, J., Pluess, M., Belsky, J., & Wolke, D. (2014). Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children's academic achievement: A test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, S., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Belsky, J., & Silva, P. (2001). Why are children born to teen mothers at risk for adverse outcomes in young adulthood? Results from a 20-year longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 377–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, J., Snidman, N., Kahn, V., & Towsley, S. (2007). The preservation of two infant temperaments into adolescence. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72, 1–75, vii; discussion, 76–91. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00436.x Google ScholarPubMed
Kaitz, M., Maytal, H. R., Devor, N., Bergman, L., & Mankuta, D. (2010). Maternal anxiety, mother-infant interactions, and infants’ response to challenge. Infant Behavior & Development, 33, 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.12.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiff, C. J., Lengua, L. J., & Zalewski, M. (2011). Nature and nurturing: Parenting in the context of child temperament. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 251–301. doi:10.1007/s10567-011-0093-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, P., Feldman, R., Mayes, L. C., Eicher, V., Thompson, N., Leckman, J. F., et al. (2011). Breastfeeding, brain activation to own infant cry, and maternal sensitivity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 52, 907–915. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02406.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S., & Kochanska, G. (2013). Child temperament moderates effects of parent–child mutuality on self-regulation: A relationship-based path for emotionally negative infants. Child Development, 83, 1275–1289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01778.x.Child CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim-Spoon, J., Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2012). A longitudinal study of emotion regulation, emotion lability-negativity, and internalizing symptomatology in maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child Development, 84, 512–527. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01857.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Murray, K., & Coy, K. C. (1997). Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development, 68, 263–277. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01939.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Philibert, R. A., & Barry, R. A. (2009). Interplay of genes and early mother-child relationship in the development of self-regulation from toddler to preschool age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 50, 1331–1338. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02050.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Tjebkes, J. L., & Fortnan, D. R. (2008). Children's emerging regulation of conduct: Restraint, compliance, and internalization from infancy to the second year. Child Development, 69, 1378–1389. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06218.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, C. B. (1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25, 343–354. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulomzin, M., Beebe, B., Anderson, S., & Jaffe, J. (2002). Infant gaze, head, face and self-touch at 4 months differentiate secure vs. avoidant attachment at 1 year: A microanalytic approach. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLean, P. C., Rynes, K. N., Aragón, C., Caprihan, A., Phillips, J. P., & Lowe, J. R. (2014). Mother-infant mutual eye gaze supports emotion regulation in infancy during the Still-Face Paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development, 37, 512–522. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madigan, S., Moran, G., & Pederson, D. R. (2006). Unresolved states of mind, disorganized attachment relationships, and disrupted interactions of adolescent mothers and their infants. Developmental Psychology, 42, 293–304. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.293 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertesacker, B., Bade, U., Haverkock, A., & Pauli-Pott, U. (2004). Predicting maternal reactivity/sensitivity: The role of infant emotionality, maternal depressiveness/anxiety, and social support. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25, 47–61. doi:10.1002/imhj.10085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2009). The many faces of the Still-Face Paradigm: A review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 29, 120–162. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies 1. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills-Koonce, W. R., Gariépy, J.-L., Propper, C., Sutton, K., Calkins, S., Moore, G., et al. (2007). Infant and parent factors associated with early maternal sensitivity: A caregiver-attachment systems approach. Infant Behavior and Development, 30, 114–126. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.11.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2004). Infants’ vagal regulation in the Still-Face Paradigm is related to dyadic coordination of mother-infant interaction. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1068–1080. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1068 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G. A., Cohn, J. F., & Campbell, S. B. (2001). Infant affective responses to mother's still face at 6 months differentially predict externalizing and internalizing behaviors at 18 months. Developmental Psychology, 37, 706–714. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.5.706 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G. A., Hill-Soderlund, A. L., Propper, C. B., Calkins, S. D., Mills-Koonce, W. R., & Cox, M. J. (2009). Mother-infant vagal regulation in the face-to-face Still-Face Paradigm is moderated by maternal sensitivity. Child Development, 80, 209–223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01255.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, L., Fiori-Cowley, A., Hooper, R., & Cooper, P. (1996). The impact of postnatal depression and associated adversity on early mother-infant interactions and later infant outcome. Child Development, 67, 2512–2526. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01871.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parfitt, Y. M., & Ayers, S. (2009). The effect of post-natal symptoms of post-traumatic stress and depression on the couple's relationship and parent-baby bond. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27, 127–142. doi:10.1080/02646830802350831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2009). Differential susceptibility to rearing experience: The case of childcare. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 50, 396–404. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01992.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poehlmanna, J., Hanea, A., Burnsona, C., Malecka, S., Hamburgera, E., & Shah, P. E. (2013). Preterm infants who are prone to distress: Differential effects of parenting on 36-month behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 1018–1025. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02564.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porges, S. W. (1985). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: An index of vagal tone. In F. J. Orlebeke, G. Mulder, & L. J. P. Van Dornen (Eds.), Psychophysiology of cardiovascular control: Models, methods, and data (pp. 437–450). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Porges, S. W. (2001). The polyvagal theory: Phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42, 123–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porges, S. W. (2003). The polyvagal theory: Phylogenetic contributions to social behavior. Physiology & Behavior, 79, 503–513. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00156-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology, 74, 116–143. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provost, M. A., & Gouin-Decarie, T. (1979). Heart rate reactivity of 9- and 12-month-old infants showing specific emotions in a natural setting. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyna, B. A., & Pickler, R. H. (2009). Mother-infant synchrony. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 38, 470–477. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01044.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389–409. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000065 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In Advances in developmental psychology (pp. 37–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. K., Sheese, B. E., Rueda, M. R., & Posner, M. I. (2011). Developing mechanisms of self-regulation in early life. Emotion Review, 3, 207–213. doi:10.1177/1754073910387943 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., Ziaie, H., & O'Boyle, C. G. (1992). Self-regulation and emotion in infancy. New Directions for Child Development, 55, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (2009). The transactional model. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81, 6–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schore, A. N. (2000). Attachment and the regulation of the right brain. Attachment & Human Development, 2, 23–47. doi:10.1080/146167300361309 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifer, R., Schiller, M., Sameroff, A. J., Resnick, S., & Riordan, K. (1996). Attachment, maternal sensitivity, and infant temperament during the first year of life. Developmental Psychology, 32, 12–25. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skuban, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Supplee, L. H., & Nichols, S. R. (2006). The correlates of dyadic synchrony in high-risk, low-income toddler boys. Infant Behavior and Development, 29, 423–434. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.02.004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stack, D. M., & Muir, D. W. (1992). Adult tactile stimulation during face-to-face interactions modulates five-month-olds’ affect and attention. Child Development, 63, 1509–1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, A., Craske, M. G., Lehtonen, A., Harvey, A., Savage-McGlynn, E., Davies, B., et al. (2012). Maternal cognitions and mother-infant interaction in postnatal depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 795–809. doi:10.1037/a0026847 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tarabulsy, G. M., Provost, M. A., Deslandes, J., St.-Laurent, D., Moss, E., Lemelin, J.-P., et al. (2003). Individual differences in infant still-face response at 6 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 421–438. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(03)00039-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (2007). The neurobehavioral and social-emotional development of infants and children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Williams, L. R., Degnan, K. A., Perez-Edgar, K. E., Henderson, H. A., Rubin, K. H., Pine, D. S., et al. (2009). Impact of behavioral inhibition and parenting style on internalizing and externalizing problems from early childhood through adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 1063–1075. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9331-3.ImpactCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelkowitz, P., Papageorgiou, A., Bardin, C., & Wang, T. (2009). Persistent maternal anxiety affects the interaction between mothers and their very low birthweight children at 24 months. Early Human Development, 85, 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.06.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, M. (1999). Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model (pp. 3–23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar