Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:17:11.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Job for Philosophers: Causality, Responsibility, and Explaining Social Inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2018

ROBIN ZHENG*
Affiliation:
Yale-NUS College

Abstract

People disagree about the causes of social inequality and how to most effectively intervene in them. These may seem like empirical questions for social scientists, not philosophers. However, causal explanation itself depends on broadly normative commitments. From this it follows that (moral) philosophers have an important role to play in determining those causal explanations. I examine the case of causal explanations of poverty to demonstrate these claims. In short, philosophers who work to reshape our moral expectations also work, on the back end, to restructure acceptable causal explanationsand hence solutionsfor social inequality. Empirical and normative inquiry, then, are a two-way street.

On se dispute souvent au sujet des causes des inégalités sociales et de la meilleure façon de les corriger. Ces discussions peuvent sembler relever du domaine des sciences sociales plus que de la philosophie. Cependant, l’explication causale des inégalités sociales dépend elle-même d’engagements normatifs : les philosophes ont donc ici un rôle important à jouer. J’examine le cas des explications causales de la pauvreté afin de démontrer ces assertions. Pour résumer, les philosophes qui essaient de remodeler nos attentes morales peuvent également restructurer des explications causales des inégalités sociales — et donc proposer des solutions à celles-ci. La recherche empirique et la recherche normative sont donc en relation de réciprocité.

Type
Special Issue: Philosophy and its Borders
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, and Sacerdote, Bruce 2001 “Why Doesn’t the U.S. Have a European-style Welfare System?,” in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, edited by Brainard, William C. and Perry, George L.. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 187277.Google Scholar
Alicke, Mark D. 1992 “Culpable Causation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (3): 368378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth 2004 “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce.” Hypatia 19 (1): 124.Google Scholar
Anderson, Martin 1978 Welfare: The Political Economy of Welfare Reform in the United States. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Christopher B., and Maxwell, Daniel G. 2005 Food Aid after Fifty Years: Recasting Its Role. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, Marc 2007 “World Social Forum.” Peace & Change 32 (2): 203220.Google Scholar
Benétreau-Dupin, Yann, and Beaulac, Guillaume 2015 “Fair Numbers: What Data Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy.” Ergo 2 (3): 5981.Google Scholar
Benforado, Adam, and Hanson, Jon 2005 “Costs of Dispositionism: The Premature Demise of Situationist Law and Economics.” Maryland Law Review 64 (1-2): 2484.Google Scholar
Blank, Rebecca M. 2003 “Selecting among Anti-Poverty Policies: Can an Economist Be Both Critical and Caring?” Review of Social Economy 61 (4): 447469.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J.D. 1992 An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Urie 1979 The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, Heather 2006 “Justifying Inequality: A Social Psychological Analysis of Beliefs about Poverty and the Poor.” National Poverty Center Working Paper Series, #06–08.Google Scholar
Carr, Stuart C., and MacLachlan, Malcolm 1998 “Actors, Observers, and Attributions for Third World Poverty: Contrasting Perspectives from Malawi and Australia.” The Journal of Social Psychology 138 (2): 189202.Google Scholar
Choi, Incheol, Nisbett, Richard E., and Norenzayan, Ara 1999 “Causal Attribution Across Cultures: Variation and Universality.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (1): 4763.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. 1940 An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill 1990/2000 Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
CONSAD Research Corporation 2009 “An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages between Men and Women.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Mary, Duncan, Greg J., Gurin, Gerald, and Gurin, Patricia 1985 “Myth and Reality: The Causes and Persistence of Poverty.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4 (4): 516536.Google Scholar
da Costa, Leonor Pereira, and Dias, José G. 2015 “What Do Europeans Believe to Be the Causes of Poverty? A Multilevel Analysis of Heterogeneity within and between Countries.” Social Indicators Research 122 (1): 120.Google Scholar
Danziger, Sheldon, and Weinberg, Daniel H. 1986 Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn’t. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darby, Derrick 2010 “Reparations and Racial Inequality.” Philosophy Compass 5 (1): 5566.Google Scholar
Darby, Derrick, and Branscombe, Nyla R. 2012 “Egalitarianism and Perceptions of Inequality.” Philosophical Topics 40 (1): 725.Google Scholar
Deveaux, Monique 2015 “The Global Poor as Agents of Justice.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (2): 125150.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, Galiant, Sebastian, and Schargrodsky, Ernesto 2007 “The Formation of Beliefs: Evidence from the Allocation of Land Titles to Squatters.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (1): 209241.Google Scholar
Eccles, Jacquelynne S. 1987 “Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement-Related Decisions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 11 (2): 135172.Google Scholar
England, Paula 1992 Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe R. 1972 “Poverty: We Still Believe That God Helps Those Who Help Themselves.” Psychology Today 6 (6): 101129.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel 1970 Doing & Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda 2007 Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton 1962 Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galster, George C., and Carr, James H. 1991 “Housing Discrimination and Urban Poverty of African-Americans.” Journal of Housing Research 2 (2): 87123.Google Scholar
Gannett, Lisa 1999 “What’s in a Cause?: The Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Explanations.” Biology and Philosophy 14 (3): 349373.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun, and Sonderholm, Jorn 2012 “Global Poverty: Four Normative Positions.” Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3): 193213.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T., and Malone, Patrick S. 1995 “The Correspondence Bias.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 2138.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret 1989 On Social Facts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol 1982 In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guimond, Serge, and Palmer, Douglas L. 1990 “Type of Academic Training and Causal Attributions for Social Problems.” European Journal of Social Psychology 20 (1): 6175.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1995 “The Looping Effect of Human Kinds,” in Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, edited by Sperber, Dan, Premack, David, and Premack, Ann James. London: Clarendon Press, pp. 351383.Google Scholar
Hanson, Jon 2012 Ideology, Psychology, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra 1991 Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., and Honoré, Tony 1985 Causation in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1958 “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71 (4): 593629.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy 1983 “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism,” in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, edited by Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 283310.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher, and Knobe, Joshua 2009 “Cause and Norm.” Journal of Philosophy 106 (11): 587612.Google Scholar
Hunt, Matthew O. 2004 “Race/Ethnicity and Beliefs about Wealth and Poverty.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (3): 827853.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., and Braman, Donald 2006 “Cultural Cognition and Public Policy.” Yale Law & Policy Review 24 (1): 149172.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard 1936 The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 1996 The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua 2009 “Folk Judgments of Causation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (2): 238242.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua 2010 “Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4): 315329.Google Scholar
Kronfeldner, Maria 2014 “Commentary: How Norms Make Causes.” International Journal of Epidemiology 43 (6): 17071713.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1977 The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Melvin J. 1980 The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David 1973 “Causation.” Journal of Philosophy 70 (17): 556567.Google Scholar
Lewis, Oscar 1966 La Vida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty—San Juan and New York. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990 Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1995 “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese 104 (3): 383397.Google Scholar
Lukács, György 1971 History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J.L. 1965 “Causes and Conditions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (4): 245264.Google Scholar
Markus, Hazel R., and Kitayama, Shinobu 1991 “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological Review 98 (2): 224253.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1867/1976 Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Volume One). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maseko, Nokwanda, Viljoen, Diana, and Muzindutsi, Paul-Francois 2014 “Differences in Perceived Causes of Poverty between First and Third Year Economics Students in a Higher Education Institution.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5 (21): 245250.Google Scholar
McLoyd, Vonnie C. 1998 “Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Child Development.” American Psychologist 53 (2): 185204.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1843/2011 A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker 1976 Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Charles A. 1984 Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ng, Irene Y.H., and Koh, Grace 2012 “Chinese Singaporean Attitudes Towards Poverty and Inequality: A Comparative Analysis.” International Journal of Social Welfare 21 (2): 149159.Google Scholar
Nisbett, Richard E., Peng, Kaiping, Choi, Incheol, and Norenzayan, Ara 2001 “Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition.” Psychological Review 108 (2): 291310.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason 2010 “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32 (2): 303330.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Michael, and Crowley, Stephen J. 2012 “Philosophical Intervention and Cross-Disciplinary Science: The Story of the Toolbox Project.” Synthese 190 (11): 19371954.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas 2014 Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Reskin, Barbara 1993 “Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 19 (1): 241270.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur 1994 “Equality, Luck, and Responsibility.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 23 (1): 323.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee 1977 “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 10, edited by Berkowitz, Leonard. New York: Academic Press, pp. 173220.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1912 “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 126.Google Scholar
Sampson, Edward E. 1989 “The Challenge of Social Change for Psychology: Globalization and Psychology’s Theory of the Person.” American Psychologist 44 (6): 914921.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer 2013 “Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy,” in Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, edited by Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3960.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan 2005 “Contrastive Causation.” Philosophical Review 114 (3): 327358.Google Scholar
Schweiger, Gottfried 2016 “Epistemic Injustice and Powerlessness in the Context of Global Justice: An Argument for ‘Thick’ and ‘Small’ Knowledge.” Wagadu. A Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies 15: 104115.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1995 The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sesardic, Neven, and De Clercq, Raphael 2014 “Women in Philosophy: Problems with the Discrimination Hypothesis.” Academic Questions 27 (4): 461473.Google Scholar
Shaver, Kelly G. 1970 “Defensive Attribution: Effects of Severity and Relevance on the Responsibility Assigned for an Accident.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 14 (2): 101113.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Tracy, and Rucell, Jessica 2015 “Sociological Perspectives on Poverty.” York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Smiley, Marion 1992 Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community: Power and Accountability from a Pragmatic Point of View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert 1910 Social Statics. London: Watts and Co.Google Scholar
Steger, Manfred B., and Wilson, Erin K. 2012 “Anti-Globalization or Alter-Globalization? Mapping the Political Ideology of the Global Justice Movement.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (3): 439454.Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael 2008 Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel 1974 “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 11241131.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980 The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vu, Catherine M. 2010 “The Influence of Social Science Theories on the Conceptualization of Poverty in Social Welfare.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 20 (8): 9891010.Google Scholar
Waters, Kenneth C. 2007 “Causes That Make a Difference.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (11): 551579.Google Scholar
Wilson, William J. 1987 The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James 2010 “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation.” Biology & Philosophy 25 (3): 287318.Google Scholar
Woodward, James 2003 Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank 1990 “World Development Report: Poverty.” Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank 2015 “World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 2011 Responsibility for Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar