Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:49:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Respect-Worthiness and Dignity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2013

CAROL HAY
CAROL HAY*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Lowell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that failing to fulfill the Kantian obligation to protect one’s rational nature might actually vitiate future instances of this obligation. To avoid this conclusion, I argue that, contrary to the received view among Kant scholars, the feature in virtue of which someone has unconditional and incomparable value is not the same feature in virtue of which she is owed the respect that constrains how she may be treated. Even though someone who fails to attempt to protect her rational nature fails to respect herself, and even though this moral failing does make her lose a certain kind of value, her obligations to respect herself remain.

Je soutiens que le fait de manquer au devoir kantien de protéger sa propre nature rationnelle pourrait vicier les instances futures de ce devoir. Pour éviter cette conclusion, je soutiens, contrairement au consensus établi parmi les spécialistes de Kant, que la caractéristique qui confère à une personne sa valeur inconditionnelle et incomparable n’est pas la même que celle en vertu de laquelle cette personne mérite le respect qui délimite le traitement qui lui est dû. Bien qu’une personne manquant à son devoir de protéger sa nature rationnelle ne se respecte pas, et bien que cet échec moral lui fasse perdre un certain type de valeur, ses obligations au respect de soi demeurent.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 587 - 612
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxley, Anne Margaret 2003 “Autonomy and Autocracy,” Kant-Studien 94: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 1977 “Two Kinds of Respect,” Ethics 88: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Richard 2006 The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara 2010 “Freedom, Primacy, and Perfect Duties to Oneself,” Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Denis, Lara. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen 1996 “Happiness and the Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant,” Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2000 Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2003 “Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy,” Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 70–98.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas 1992 Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas 2000 Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1780 Lectures on Ethics, ed. and trans. Heath, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1785 Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1788 The Critique of Practical Reason, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1793 Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, ed. and trans. Wood, Alan and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1797 The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine 1996 Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Michael J. 1989 “Dignity, Rights, and Self-Control,” Ethics 99: 520–534.Google Scholar
Paton, Herbert James 1947 The Categorical Imperative. London: Hutchison & Co.Google Scholar
Selby, Hubert 1957 “Tralala,” Last Exit to Brooklyn. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver 2009 “Kant’s Conception of Human Dignity,” Kant-Studien 100: 309–331.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark 2002 Moral Theory: An Introduction. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wood, Allan 1999 Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allan 2008 Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar