Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T10:07:47.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Action: On Cause and Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Andrew Sneddon
Andrew Sneddon
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions/Discussions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Winter 2004 , pp. 157 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, John 1989 Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buckareff, Andrei, and Zhu, Jing 2004 “Causalisms Reconsidered.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 43, 1: 147–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980 Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred 1988 Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1970 A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Juarrero, Alicia 1999 Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press—A Bradford Book.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, Andrew 2001a “Considering Causalisms.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 40, 2: 343–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, Andrew 2001b “Does Philosophy of Action Rest on a Mistake?” Metaphilosophy, 32, 5: 502–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar