Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:07:07.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hegel’s Moral Concept of Evil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

TIMOTHY BROWNLEE*
Affiliation:
Xavier University

Abstract

The central aim of this article is to set out the essential elements of Hegel’s conception of evil. I demonstrate that Hegel understands evil primarily as a moral phenomenon. In particular, he identifies evil as a pernicious subjectivism and hypocrisy that undermines the social and institutional conditions for ethical action. An appropriate understanding of his conception of evil points to the centrality of trust to ethicality (die Sittlichkeit).

L’objectif principal de cet article est de faire ressortir les éléments essentiels de la conception du mal selon Hegel. Je démontre que Hegel comprend le mal principalement comme un phénomène (d’ordre) moral. Il identifie tout particulièrement le mal comme un subjectivisme pernicieux et une hypocrisie qui détruit les conditions sociales et institutionnelles d’une action éthique. Une compréhension appropriée de sa conception du mal souligne la centralité de la confiance à la vie éthique (die Sittlichkeit).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah 1958 The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York and Cleveland: Meridian.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette 1995 Moral Prejudices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette 2009 Reflections on How we Live. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 2005 Hegel. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. 2011Trust: On the Real but Almost Always Unnoticed, Ever-Changing Foundation of Ethical Life.Metaphilosophy 42, 4: 395416.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 2001 Radical Evil. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia 2002 The Atrocity Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chételat, Pierre 2009Hegel’s Philosophy of World History as Theodicy.” Hegel on History. Edited by Dudley., WillAlbany, NY: State University of New York Press. 215230.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger and Cowen, Christopher 1994Hypocrisy and Moral Seriousness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 31, 4: 343349.Google Scholar
Fackenheim, Emil 1982 The Religious Dimension of Hegel’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1995 Das System der Sittenlehre nach den Prinzipien der Wissenschaftslehre. Edited by Medicus, Fritz. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1952 Die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Edited by J. Hoffmeister. Hamburg: Meiner; designated “PhG,” followed by the paragraph number and page number.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970a Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. TW 8–10; designated “E,” followed by the volume number, section number (where “R” refers to the “Remark” to the paragraph, and “A” to the “Addition”), and page number.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970b Die Philosophie des Rechts. TW 7; designated “PR,” followed by the section number (where “R” refers to the “Remark” to the paragraph, and “A” to the Addition) and page number.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970c Theorie Werkausgabe. Edited by Eva Moldenauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp; designated “TW.”Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970d Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, 3 Vols. TW 13–15; designated “,” followed by the volume number.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970e Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte. TW 12; designated “VPG.”Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2005 Die Philosophie des Rechts, Vorlesung von 1821/22. Edited by Hoppe, Hansgeorg. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 2005.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1977 Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Theorie Werkausgabe VIII. Edited Weischedel, Wilhelm. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder 1982On hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 13, 3: 277289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1966 A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1984 After Virtue, 2nd Edition. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University PressGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Christine 1991Hypocrisy, with a note on Integrity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28, 4: 321330.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Christine 2005Hypocrisy, Cheating, and Character Possession.” Journal of Value Inquiry 29: 399414.Google Scholar
Moyar, Dean 2011 Hegel’s Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan 2004 Evil in Modern Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan T. 2001 Modern Freedom: Hegel’s Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, Terry 1999Virtues, Morality, and Sittlichkeit: From Maxims to Practices.European Journal of Philosophy 7, 2: 217238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 1997Hegel’s Ethical Rationalism.” Idealism as Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 417450.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2008 Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert 1960 The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. 1927 Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und die damit zusammenhängenden Gegenstände. Schellings Werke IV. Edited by Schröter, Manfred. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith 1984Let us not be hypocritical.” Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 4586.Google Scholar
Szabados, Béla 1979Hypocrisy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9, 2: 6078.Google Scholar
Szabados, Béla and Soifer, Eldon 1999Hypocrisy, Change of Mind, and Weakness of Will.” Metaphilosophy 30, 1/2: 6078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1989 Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar