Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:43:13.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language, Concepts, and Emotions in Charles Taylor’s The Language Animal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

CHRISTOPH DEMMERLING
CHRISTOPH DEMMERLING*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena
*
*<christoph.demmerling@uni-jena.de>
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human beings shape the landscapes of their individual, social, and political lives entangled in a web of language. Everything that human beings do, the way they act and think, is shaped by the use of language. Charles Taylor explores these anthropological dimensions of language. This article discusses three different aspects of Taylor’s language-oriented anthropology and confronts his considerations with three distinct questions concerning the relation between language and the lives of human beings. The first question is how Taylor’s constitutive view of language can be related to his criticism of the mediational view of language. Next, the relation between language and concepts is discussed. Finally, emotions are considered.

Les êtres humains tracent les contours de leur vie individuelle, sociale et politique dans un réseau de langage. L’utilisation de la langue préside à tout ce qu’ils font, à la manière dont ils agissent et pensent. Charles Taylor explore ces dimensions anthropologiques du langage. Cet article traite de trois différents aspects de cette anthropologie fondée sur le langage et met à l’épreuve les considérations de Taylor à l’aide de trois questions distinctes touchant à la relation entre le langage et la vie des êtres humains. Il s’agit d’abord de comprendre comment sa vision constitutive du langage peut être liée à sa critique de l’approche médiationnelle du langage. L’article aborde ensuite la relation entre le langage et les concepts et, enfin, la question des émotions.

Keywords

languagemediational viewconceptsemotionsunderstanding
Type
Special Issue: Charles Taylor’s The Language Animal
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 633 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allmäng, Jan 2008 “Affordances and the Nature of Conceptual Content,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2): 161–177.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor 2003 Heidegger’s Analytic. Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time, Cambridge/Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demmerling, Christoph 2002 Sinn, Bedeutung, Verstehen. Untersuchungen zu Sprachphilosophie und Hermeneutik, Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demmerling, Christoph 2016 “An den Grenzen der Sprache? Heideggers Zeuganalyse und die Begrifflichkeitsthese,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 64 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Taylor, Charles 2015 Retrieving Realism, Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1996 Being and Time. A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Translated by Stambaugh, Joan, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 2005 “Merleau-Ponty and the Epistemological Picture,” in: The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Carman, T. and Hansen, M.B.N. (eds.). Cambridge/Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 2016 The Language Animal. The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, Cambridge/Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1953 Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar