Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:18:43.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Les conditions de l'interprétation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Martin Montminy
Affiliation:
Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey

Extract

Donald Davidson considère qu'une théorie de l'interprétation doit être radicale, c'est-à-dire qu'elle ne doit présupposer aucune connaissance de la langue à interpréter. Cette exigence repose sur l'idée suivante: si une théorie de l'interprétation pour une langue L présuppose une certaine compréhension de L, alors elle perd son pouvoir explicatif et échoue à rendre compte de ce qui permet la compréhension de L. L'interpr'tation radicale a l'avantage de nous forcer à rendre explicite ce qui est à l'œuvre dans le processus d'interprétation du comportement verbal d'autrui. Elle nous permet aussi de nous concentrer sur la nature des données empiriques qui rendent possible la communication. Il importe de noter que Davidson ne veut aucunement suggérer qu'un interprète compétent de L connaϊt ou possède une théorie de l'interprétation pour L: la théorie set plutôt à donner une description de sa compétence.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Ayer, Alfred Jules 1946 Language, Truth and Logic, 2e éd., New York, Dover Publications, 1952.Google Scholar
Bar-On, Dorit et Mark, Risjord 1992 «Is There Such a Thing as a Language?», Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 22, p. 163190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 1985 «Critical Notice of Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation», Mind, vol. 94, p. 601626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel 1992 Belief and Meaning, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brandl, Johannes et Gombocz, Wolfgang L., dir. 1989 The Mind of Donald Davidson, Amsterdam, Rodopi.Google Scholar
Brueckner, Anthony 1986 «Charity and Skepticism», Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 67, p. 264268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1979 «Individualism and the Mental», dans French et al., 1979, p. 73121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982 «Other Bodies», dans Woodfield, 1982, p. 97120.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1963 «W. V. Quine on Logical Truth», dans Schilpp, 1963, p. 915922.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980a Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1980b «Toward a Unified Theory of Meaning and Action», Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 2, p. 112.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984a «First Person Authority», Dialectica, vol. 38, p. 101111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1984b Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985a «A New Basis for Decision Theory», Theory and Decision, vol. 18, p. 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1985b «RationalAnimals», dans Leporeet McLaughlin, 1985, p. 473481.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1986a «A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge», dans Lepore, 1986, p. 307319.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1986b «A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs», dans Lepore, 1986, p. 433446.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1987 «Knowing One's Own Mind», Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 60, p. 441458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1989a «The Conditions of Thought», dans Brandl et Gombocz, 1989, p. 193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1989b «The Myth of the Subjective», dans Krausz, 1989, p. 159172.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1990a «Representation and Interpretation», dans Said et al., 1990, p. 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1990b «The Structure and Content of Truth», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, p. 279328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1991a «Epistemology Externalized», Dialectica, vol. 45, p. 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1991b «Three Varieties of Knowledge», dans Griffiths, 1991, p. 153166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1994 «The Social Aspect of Language», dans McGuinness et Oliveri, 1994, p. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel 1987 The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard et Fumerton, Richard 1985 «Davidson's Theism?», Philosophical Studies, vol. 48, p. 8389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, A. P., Uehling, T. et Wettstein, H., dir. 1979 Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 4, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Glymour, Clark 1982 «Conceptual Scheming or Confessions of a Metaphysical Realist», Synthese, vol. 51, p. 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, Richard 1973 «Reference, Meaning, and Belief», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 70, p. 439452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. et Strawson, P. F. 1956 «In Defense of a Dogma», Philosophical Review, vol. 65, p. 141158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A., dir. 1991 A. J. Ayer: Memorial Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, David 1987 «The Principle of Charity and the Problem or Irrationality», Synthese, vol. 73, p. 225252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, M. et Lukes, S., dir. 1982 Rationality and Relativism, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Peter 1986 «Radical Interpretation and Global Skepticism», dans Lepore, 1986, p. 369386.Google Scholar
Michael, Krausz, dir. 1989 Relativism, Notre-Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Laurier, Daniel 1992 «Rationality and Intentionality: A Defence of Optimization in Theories of Interpretation», Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 43, p. 125141.Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernest, dir. 1986 Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lepore, E. et McLaughlin, B., dir. 1985 Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Kirk 1992 «Skepticism and Interpretation», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 52, p. 317339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven 1982 «Relativism in Its Place», dans Hollis et Lukes, 1982, p. 261305.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Graham et Pettit, Philip 1981 Semantics and Social Science, Londres, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin 1977 «Charity, Interpretation, and Belief», The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 74, p. 521535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1986 «Radical Interpretation and Epistemology», dans Lepore, 1986, p. 356368.Google Scholar
McGuinness, B. et Oliveri, G., dir. 1994 The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montminy, Martin 1990 «Logique et comportement verdictif», Logique et Analyse, vol. 131–132, p. 295309.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1960 Word and Object, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Said, K. A. M. et al, dir. 1990 Modelling the Mind, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, P. A., dir. 1963 The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, IL, Open Press.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen 1983 From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul et Nisbett, R. E. 1983 «Rationality and Charity», Philosophy of Science, vol. 50, p. 250267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermazen, Bruce 1983 «The Intelligibility of Massive Error», The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 33, p. 6974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael 1988 «Scepticism and Charity», Ratio, vol. 1, p. 176194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodfield, Andrew, dir. 1982 Thought and Object, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar