Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:32:40.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Must Constrained Maximizers Be Uncharitable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Jordan Howard Sobel
Jordan Howard Sobel
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By his definition of them, David Gauthier's co-operative constrained maximizers are not necessarily unsharing and disposed to exclude straight maximizers from benefits of their co-operation. Here is Gauthier's full and exact account, his official account, of constrained maximization.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 241 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bright, Robert 1994 “Comments on Howard Sobel, ‘Must Constrained Maximizers Be Uncharitable?’.” Canadian Philosophical Association Annual Meetings, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Campbell, Richmond 1988 “Gauthier's Theory of Morals by Agreement.” Philosophical Quarterly, 38: 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielson, Peter 1988 “The Visible Hand of Morality.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18: 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 Danielson, PeterArtificial Morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1975 “Reason and Maximization.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4:411–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David 1985 “Maximization Constrained: The Rationality of Cooperation.”; In Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem. Edited by Campbell, R. and Sowden, L.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1986 Morals by Agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1950 Leviathan. 1651. Rpt. Introduction by A. D. Lindsay. Everyman's Library No. 691 A. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, Duncan 1991 “Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality.” Dialogue, 30, 1–2: 3-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1975 “Interaction Problems for Utility Maximizers.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4: 677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1976 “Utility Maximizers in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemmas.” Dialogue, 15: 38–53. (Reprinted with revisions in Jordan Howard Sobel, Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.)Google Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1988 “Maximizing, Optimizing and Prospering.” Dialogue, 27: 233–62. (Reprinted in part with revisions in Jordan Howard Sobel, Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.)Google Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1989 “Kent Bach on Good Arguments.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19: 447-53. (Reprinted with revisions in Jordan Howard Sobel, Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.)Google Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1991 “Constrained Maximization.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Jordan Howard 1993 “Straight vs Constrained Maximization.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23: 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar