Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:47:22.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socrates’ Human Wisdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2013

DYLAN FUTTER*
Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand

Abstract

The concept of human wisdom is fundamental for an understanding of the Apology. But it has not been properly understood. The received interpretations offer insufficient resources for explaining how Socrates could have been humanly wise before Apollo’s oracle, when he falsely believed that he was not wise at all. I argue that a satisfactory interpretation of human wisdom can be given in terms of “philosophia”. Socrates was humanly wise before the oracle because he loved wisdom—even though he did not know that he did. The analysis is confirmed by its resolution of some enduring difficulties in the interpretation of Apology, in particular, the question of why Socrates continued to search for knowledge he thought impossible to attain.

La notion de sagesse humaine est fondamentale pour comprendre l’Apologie — mais elle n’a jamais été comprise correctement. Les interprétations généralement acceptées n’offrent pas assez d’éléments pour expliquer comment Socrate pouvait faire preuve d’une sagesse humaine devant l’oracle d’Apollon, alors qu’il croyait à tort ne pas être sage du tout. Je soutiens qu’une interprétation satisfaisante de la sagesse humaine est possible en termes de «philosophia». Socrate fut humainement sage devant l’oracle parce qu’il aimait la sagesse — même s’il ne savait pas qu’il l’aimait. L’analyse est confirmée par le fait qu’elle résout certaines difficultés bien établies de l’interprétation de l’Apologie, en particulier la question de savoir pourquoi Socrate continuait à chercher un savoir qu’il savait être hors d’atteinte.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, A. M. A. 1951 The Apology of Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benson, H. 2000 Socratic Wisdom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. 2002 The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. and Smith, N. D. 1994 Plato’s Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calef, S. W. 1996What is Human Wisdom?Knowledge, Teaching and Wisdom. Eds. Lehrer, K., Lum, B., Slichta, B. and Smith., N.Dordrecht: Kluwer: 3547.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alastair V. 2009 The Body in Bioethics. London and New York: Routledge-Cavendish. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Alastair V. 2010 Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1997 Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
De Strycker, E. and Slings, S. R. 1994 Plato’s Apology of Socrates: A Literary and Philosophical Study With a Running Commentary. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1963 Collected Poems (1909-1962). London: Faber.Google Scholar
Forster, M. 2006Socrates’ Demand for Definitions.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 31: 147.Google Scholar
Forster, M. 2007Socrates’ Profession of Ignorance.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32:135.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 2002 What is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hackforth, R. 1933 The Composition of Plato’s Apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, M. 1988The Virtues of Socratic Ignorance.” Classical Quarterly. 38 (2): 331350.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. 1992Socratic Piety in the Euthyphro.” Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates. Ed. Benson., H.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220241.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1992What Did Socrates Teach and To Whom Did He Teach it?Review of Metaphysics 42: 279306.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1998 The Art of Living. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Politis, V. 2006Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato”. Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Eds. Judson, L. and Karasmanis., V.Oxford: Oxford University Press: 88109.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1989 Socrates in the Apology. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Roedl, S. 2007 Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. 1996 “Wisdom”. Knowledge, Teaching, and Wisdom. Lehrer, K., Lum, J., Slichta, B. and Smith, N.. Dordrecht: Kluwer 233242.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. 1999What is Wisdom?Philosophical Studies 93: 119139.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. 2008Wisdom”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/wisdom/Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. 1999 Clitophon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1992Socrates’ Mission”. Socratic Questions: The Philosophy of Socrates and its Significance. Eds. Stokes, M. and Gower., B. S.London: Routledge: 2681.Google Scholar
Stokes, M. C. 1997 Plato: Apology. With an Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1983The Socratic ElenchusOxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: 2758.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1985Socrates’ Disavavowal of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly: 131.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 2004The Socratic Elenchus”. Socratic Studies. Ed. Burnyeat., M. F.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 129.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. 2004Socrates’ Avowals of Knowledge”. Phronesis 48: 74142.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1982 Plato’s Hippias Major. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Yonezawa, S. 2004Socrates’s Conception of Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12: 122.Google Scholar