Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:38:02.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Un moteur peut-il être sémantique?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Pierre Jacob
Pierre Jacob
Affiliation:
CREA–Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

L'intentionnalité pose aux philosophes qui se réclament du matérialisme ou du physicalisme deux problèmes complémentaires qui sont les deux faces d'une même médaille. Premièrement, peut-on naturaliser l'intentionnalité? Deuxièmement, les propriétés intentionnelles des représentations sont-elles causalement efficaces? Un moteur peut-il être sémantique?

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 32 , Issue 3: Philosophy of Mind , Summer 1993 , pp. 527 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références bibliographiques

Adams, F. 1991 «Causal Contents». Dans B. McLaughlin, dir., 1991, p. 131–156.Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. 1991 «Dretske on the Explanatory Role of Belief». Philosophical Studies, vol. 63, p. 99–111.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1981 «Three Kinds of Intentional Psychology». Dans D. Dennett, 1987, p. 43–68.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1987 The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991 «Ways of Establishing Harmony». Dans B. McLaughlin, dir., 1991, p. 119–130.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1981 Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1988a «The Explanatory Role of Content». Dans R. H. Grimm et D. D. Merrill, dir., 1988, p. 31–44.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1988b Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1990 «Reply to Reviewers». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, no4, p. 819–839.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1991a «Dretske's Replies». Dans B. McLaughlin, dir., 1991, p. 55–61.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1991b «How Beliefs Explain: Reply to Baker». Philosophical Studies, vol. 63, p. 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1987 Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1990a A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1990b «Reply to Dretske's “Does Meaning Matter?”» Dans E. Villanueva, dir., 1990, p. 28–35.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1989 «Misinformation». Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 19, no4, p. 533–550.Google Scholar
Grimm, R. H. et Merrill, D. D., dir. 1988 Contents of Thought. Tucson, AZ, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. 1991 «Actions, Reasons, and the Explanatory Role of Content». Dans B. McLaughlin, dir., 1991, p. 73–101.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1991 «Dretske on How Reasons Explain Behavior». Dans B. McLaughlin, dir., 1991, p. 52–72.Google Scholar
LePore, E. et Loewer, B. 1987 «Mind Matters». The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 84, no11, p. 630–641.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., dir. 1991 Dretske and his Critics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1990 «Seismograph Readings for “Explaining Behavior”». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, no4, p. 807–812.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960 Word and Object. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, S. P. 1983 From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, S. P. 1990 «Building Belief: Some Queries about Representation, Indication, and Function». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, no4, p. 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, E., dir. 1990 Information, Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar