Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:38:49.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Matters in Love: Reflections on the Relationship between Love and Persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

GARY FOSTER*
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University

Abstract

In Reasons and Persons, Derek Parfit takes issue with Bernard Williams’ view of the relation between love and identity. Williams thought that, in a world where there were several co-existing replicas of one’s beloved, our current conception of love would begin to crumble. Parfit agrees with Williams in the branching case of replication, but thought that, where replication takes a non-branching form, our ordinary view of love would remain intact. I believe Parfit arrives at this conclusion because he has not fully appreciated the degree to which Williams’ claim is primarily about a view of love rather than one of identity.

Dans Reasons and Persons, Derek Parfit conteste le point de vue de Bernard Williams quant à la relation entre l’amour et l’identité. Williams pensait que dans un monde où plusieurs répliques de son bien-aimé existeraient, notre conception actuelle de l’amour s’avèrerait caduque. Parfit partage l’avis de Williams sur les ramifications de la réplication, mais croit que lorsque la réplication adopte une forme non ramifiée notre vision courante de l’amour demeure intacte. Je pense que Parfit arrive à cette conclusion parce qu’il a mésestimé combien l’affirmation de Williams se rapportait davantage à une vision de l’amour que de l’identité.

Type
Original Article/Article original
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Sousa, Ronald 1978 “Self-Deceptive Emotions.” Journal of Philosophy 75(11): 684697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 1988 “Identification and Wholeheartedness,” in his The Importance of What We Care About. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, Christopher 2010 “Love and History.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 48(3): 246271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert 1987 “Love De Re.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10(1): 413430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFollette, Hugh 1996 Personal Relationships: Love, Identity, and Morality. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1962 Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Smith, Colin. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Milligan, Tony 2013 “The Duplication of Love’s Reasons.” Philosophical Explorations 16(3): 315323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek 1986 Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato 1989 Symposium in Plato: The Republic and Other Works, translated by Jowett, Benjamin. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1992 Oneself as Another, translated by Blamey, Kathleen. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1956 Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, translated by Barnes, Hazel E.. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Soble, Alan 1990 The Structure of Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David 1999 “Love as a Moral Emotion.” Ethics 109(2): 338374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1973 “Are Persons Bodies?,” in his Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan 1986 “Self-Interest and Interest in Selves.” Ethics 96(4): 704720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 2005 On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like A Girl” and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar