Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:19:08.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Culture: Pragmatic and Philosophical Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Marcelo Dascal
Marcelo Dascal*
Affiliation:
University of Tel Aviv

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Telematic technologies, so-called, will impinge increasingly on personal and professional lives in the decades to come. Digitized data are already transforming international communication and the way we live our everyday lives. Sharper conceptual instruments are needed to help us analyse how to deal with these changes, as technological evolution outpaces the cultural, and the nature of the questions to be resolved is semantic rather than technical. The Turing and the Chinese room tests are invoked to help examine how man and computer can work together. But however well provided we are with syntactic and semantic knowledge, it is the absence of a developed pragmatics that stands in the way of truly intelligent computers and search engines that can do more than match symbols - i.e. identify matching content via genuinely pluridisciplinary linkages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , August 2006 , pp. 23 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2006

References

Cassell, J., et al. (2000) Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosland, M. P. (1978) Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (1978) La sémiologie de Leibniz [The Semiology of Leibniz]. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (1987) Leibniz. Language, Signs and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M. (2002) ‘Leibniz y las tecnologías cognitivas’, in Andrieu, A., Echeverría, J., and Roldan, C. (eds), Ciencia, Tecnología y Bien Común: La Actualidad de Leibniz, pp. 359–88. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.Google Scholar
Dascal, M. (2003) Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. (1966) Œuvres [Works], edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dresner, E. and Dascal, M. (2001) ‘Semantics, Pragmatics and the Digital Information Age’. Studies in Communication Sciences 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1981) Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foner, L. N. (2000) ‘Are we having fun yet? Using social agents in social domains’, in Dautenhaha, K. (ed.), Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, pp. 323–348. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Th. (1962) Leviathan, edited by Plamenatz, John. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1999) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe [Collected Writings and Letters], 6th series, volume 4. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Maudlin, L. (1994) ‘Chatterbots, tinyMUDS and the Turing Test’, in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. (1938) ‘Foundations of the Theory of Signs’, in Neurath, O., Carnap, R. and Morris, C. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1980) ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3: 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1984) Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2002) Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Haakonssen, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1996) ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, in Geirsson, H. and Losonsky, M. (eds), Readings in Language and Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ‘ELIZA - A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine’, Communications of the Association Computing Machinery 9: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Design: A New Foundation for Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar