Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T20:38:34.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is a Scientific Approach To the Eschatological Problem Possible?

A Logical Analysis of the Ecological Problem in the Widest Sense of the Term

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Vassili V. Nalimov

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“For there shall be days when you will say: Blessed is the womb which has not conceived, and those breasts which have not given suck.”

The Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas (1)

“ Oh man! why is the world becoming so narrow for you? You want to possess it alone; but if you had possessed it, it would not have been spacious enough for you:

Ah! this is the pride of the devil who has fallen from heaven into hell.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 27 , Issue 107 , September 1979 , pp. 86 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

New Testament Apocrypha. Gospels and Related Writings, v. I, Ed. by Wilson, R. McL., London, Lutterworth Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Mager, R.A., and Downhower, J., “An Evolution of Three Biomo Programs,” Science, 192, 4242, p. 859–865, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, , “ Resistance of Scientists to Scientific Discovery,” Science, 134, p. 596–602, 1961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. “The Rationality of Scientific Revolution,” Problems of Scientific Revolutions: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in Science (Ed. by Harré, R.). The Herbert Spencer Lectures, 1973, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Duncan, S.S., “The Isolation of Scientific Discovery,” Science Studies, 4, p. 109–134, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfield, E., “Negative Science and The Outlook for the Flying Machines,” Current Contests, June 27, p. 9, 26, 1977.Google Scholar
Leoni, E., Nostradamus: Life and Literature. New York, Exposition Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Leontief, V., “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts,” The American Economic Review, 61, 1, p. 1–7, March 1971.Google Scholar
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., Time Series Analysis - Forecasting and Control, San F'rancisco, 1970.Google Scholar
Feigenberg, I.M., Mozg, psikhika, zdorovye (Brain, Physics, Health), Moscow, Nauka, 1972. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, M. “Critical Remarks on Modern Theory of Myths,” Voprosy filosofii, 10, 1973. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.Z., Konders, J., Behrens, W.W., III, The Limits to Growth, a Report for the Club of Rome, Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York, Universe Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Nalimov, V.V., Barinova, Z.B., “ Sketches on the History of Cybernetics. Predecessors of Cybernetics in Ancient India, “ Darshana International, April 1974.Google Scholar
Fisher, I., Bori Brahmani Lide, Ctyri Tisicileti Hinduismu, Prague, 1964.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A., “The Religious Background to Present Environmental Studies,” International Journal of Enrivonmental Studies, 3, p. 141–148, 1972.Google Scholar
Nowakowska, M., Language of Motivations and Language of Actions. The Hague, Mouton Publishers, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalimov, V.V., Veroyatnostnaya Model Yazyka (Probabilistic Model of Language), Moscow, Nauka, 1974. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, London, 1955.Google Scholar
Reich, C.A., The Greening of America. Toronto, Bantam Books of Canada, 1971.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.R. “Prediction and social Change,” Future, 9, Oct. 1977, p. 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar