Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:59:38.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is Homo Donator a Homo Moralis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Jacques T. Godbout*
Affiliation:
University of Quebec

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Like many interested in the gift, I have to confess to having always experienced a certain attraction for methodological individualism. Through its way of approaching social actors, methodological individualism introduces the actor's concern: what are the sound principles which account for the behaviour of the actors that are observed? This is the question which individualism compels us constantly to ask. Admittedly, its response is almost always the same: self-interest. As R.H. Frank wrote:

Most [economists’] texts mention at the outset that our rational choice model takes peoples’ tastes as given. They may be altruists, sadists, masochists; or they may be concerned solely with advancing their own material interests. But having said that, most texts then proceed to ignore all motives other than material self-interest.

(Frank, 1994, p. xxiii)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

References

Arnsperger, C. (2000) Mauss et l'éthique du don. Pour un altruisme méthodologique, Revue du M.A.U.S.S. semestrielle, 15, 99119.Google Scholar
Caillé, A. (2000) Don et altruisme, Revue du M.A.U.S.S. semestrielle, 15, 120126.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É., (1992) L'enseignement de la morale à l'école primaire, Revue française de sociologie, 33, 609623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J., Gérard-Varet, L.-A., and Passeron, J.-C. (1995) Rationalité et normes sociales: un modèle pluridisciplinaire, Le modèle et l'enquête. Les usages du principe de rationalité dans les sciences sociales (Paris, Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales), pp. 139148.Google Scholar
Frank, R.H. (1994) Microeconomics and Behavior (New York and London, McGraw Hill).Google Scholar
Godbout, J.T. (2000) Le don, la dette et l'identité (Montreal and Paris, Boréal/ La Découverte) [English translation: The World of the Gift, Montreal and London, McGill and Queen's University Press, 1998].Google Scholar
Goux, J.-J. (2000) Frivolité de la valeur. Essai sur l'imaginaire du capitalisme (Paris, Blusson).Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1989c [1922]) Les Argonautes du Pacifique occidental (Paris, Gallimard) [originally published as: Argonauts of the Western Pacific, London, Routledge, 1922 ].Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1985 [1950]) Sociologie et Anthropologie (Paris, Quadrige/ PUF) [English translation of Parts III, IV, V, VI: Sociology and Psychology: Essays, trans. Ben Brewster, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul].Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1995) La volonté de puissance, volume 1 (Paris, Gallimard).Google Scholar
D'Aquin, Saint-Thomas (1932) Somme théologique: les vertus sociales [Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae], 2a-2ae, questions 101-122 (?, Desclée).Google Scholar
Sarthou-Lajus, N. (1997) L'éthique de la dette (Paris, PUF).Google Scholar
Sequeri, P., Gasparini, G., (1999) Dono verticale e orizzontale: fra teologia, filosofia e antropologia, Il Dono. Tra etica e scienze sociali (Rome, Edizioni Lavoro), pp. 107155.Google Scholar
Silber, I.F. (1995) Gift-giving in the great traditions: the case of donations to monasteries in the medieval West, Archives européennes de sociologie [European Journal of Sociology], 36, 209243.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1972) The Gift Relationship. From Human Blood to Social Policy (New York, Vintage Books).Google Scholar
Waissman, R. (1996) Analyse des acceptations et des refus du don d'organes; une étude de cas en France, Sociologie et sociétés, 28: 2, 109–118.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1967 [c.1904]) L'éthique protestante et l'esprit du capitalisme, [English translation: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Parsons, Talcott, London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd.].Google Scholar