Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:08:25.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Logics of Delusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Remo Bodei
Remo Bodei*
Affiliation:
University of Pisa

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Delusion is an exceptional test case for the principal categories of common sense and philosophical thought such as ‘reason’, ‘truth’ and ‘reality’. Via an engagement with the legacy of Freud and the most remarkable results of 20th-century psychiatry, the author's aim is to analyse the paradoxical forms of delusion and to shed light on the logics that underlie and orient its specific modalities of temporalization, conceptualization and argumentation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 37 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2004

References

Notes

The original text of this article is in Italian. When it was presented as a lecture in the context of a colloquium on ‘Madness and Philosophy’ organized by the Society for European Philosophy at Staffordshire University in 2001, it was translated into English by David Webb. It was next translated into French for Diogène by Jean Pascaud, with Pierre-Emmanuel Dauzat translating additional material from Italian. This version was translated into English for this issue by Jean Burrell.

1. Colloquium entitled ‘Le Rêve et les sociétés humaines’, Cercle Culturel de Royaumont, June 1962. Published in English as Von Grunebaum, G. E. and Caillois, R. (eds) (1966), The Dream and Human Societies, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press. See also Caillois, R. (1956), L’Incertitude qui vient des rêves, Paris, Gallimard, and (1970) L’Écriture des pierres, Geneva, Skira.

2. Blankenburg, W. (1991), La Perte de l’évidence naturelle, Paris, PUF.

3. Particularly in Bodei, R. (1997) Géométrie des passions, Paris, PUF.

4. Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J. and Weakland, J. W. (1956), ‘Towards a Theory of Schizophrenia’, Behavioral Science, vol. I, 1, pp. 251-64.

5. Goldstein, K. (1948), Language and Language Disturbances, New York, Grune & Stratton.

6. Cameron, N. (1947), The Psychology of Behavior Disorders, Boston, Houghton Mifflin.

7. Frith, C. D. (1979), ‘Consciousness, Information Processing and Schizophrenia’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, pp. 225-35.

8. Von Domarus, E. (1944), ‘The Specific Laws of Logic in Schizophrenia’, in Kasinin, J. S. (ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, pp. 104-14.

9. Matte Blanco, I. (1975), The Unconscious as Infinite Sets. An Essay in Bi-Logic, London, Duckworth; (1988) Thinking, Feeling and Being. Clinical Reflections on the Fundamental Anatomy of Human Beings and World, London and New York, Routledge.

10. Ciompi, L. (1982), Affecktlogik. Uber die Struktur der Psyche und ihre Entwicklung. Ein Beitrag zur Schizophrenie Forschung, Stuttgart, Klett Cotta.

11. See Mead, M. and Bateson, G. (1941), Balinese Character, New York, New York Academy of Sciences.

12. For a better understanding of this text, see Bodei, R. (2002) Logiques du délire. Raison, affects, folie, Paris, Aubier/Philosophie. This is a French translation of Bodei, R. (2001), Le logiche del delirio. Ragione affetti, follia, Rome and Bari, Laterza, by Pierre-Emmanuel Dauzat, to whom we extend our warmest thanks for his friendship and assistance. See also (1995) Le Prix de la liberté. Aux origines de la hiérarchie sociale chez Hegel, Paris, Cerf; (1997) Géométrie des passions. Peur, espoir, bonheur; de la philosophie à l’usage politique, Paris, PUF; (1999) La Philosophie au XXe siècle, Paris, Champs-Flammarion.