Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:49:12.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevance of Postmodernism for Social Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

John W. Murphy

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past few years postmodernism has been gaining popularity. Because the works of writers such as Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, and Félix Guattari, for example, are now readily available to the English reader, a novel intellectual force is present that must be assessed (Hassan, 1985). Terms such as “mise en abîme”, “libido”, “schizo-analysis”, “undecidables”, and so forth must be explained and their relevance for social analysis deciphered. Furthermore, a conception of knowledge, a research methodology, and an image of social order that are consistent with these somewhat odd ideas have been introduced, and thus must be evaluated with respect to their sociological importance. At first, due to the strange language that is adopted and the nature of the philosophy offered, postmodernism appears to the uninitiated as an attempt to subvert rational discussion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 36 , Issue 143 , September 1988 , pp. 93 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Barthes, Roland (1967). Writing Degree Zero, New York, Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1978). Reflections, New York, Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1969). Illuminations, New York, Schocken.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. (Ed.) (1985). Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge, Mass., SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. David (1984). Turing's Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1977). “Nomad Thought”. pp. 142–149 in The New Nietzsche, ed. Allison, David B., New York, Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1983). On the Line, New York, Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1977). Anti-Oedipus, New York, The Viking Press.Google Scholar
de MAN, PAUL (1986). The Resistance of Theory, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
de MAN, PAUL (1979). Allegories of Reading, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1974). Of Grammatology, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1973). Speech and Phenomena, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques (1979). The Policing of Families, New York, Pantheon.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Stuart, E. (1986). Mind over Machine, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana (1985). Writing and Madness, Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980). Knowledge/Power, New York, Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984). The Construction of Society, Berkeley, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Guattari, Felix (1984). Molecular Revolution, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hassan, Ihab (1985). “The Culture of Postmodernism”, Theory, Culture and Society 2, 119–130.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1982). Critical Theory, New York, Continuum.Google Scholar
Hoy, David (1985). “Jacques Derrida”, pp. 41–64 in The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, ed. Skinner, Quentin, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1980). Desire in Language, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques (1977). Ecrits, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
Lingis, Alphonso (1986). Libido, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1982). The Differentiation of Society, New York, Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984a). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984b). Driftworks, New York, Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François and Thébaud, Jean-Loup (1985). Just Gaming, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mayrl, William W. (1977). “Ethnomethodology: Sociology without Society?” pp. 262–279 in Understanding Social Inquiry, ed. Dallmayr, F.R., Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1973). The Prose of the World, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1968). The Visible and the Invisible, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1986). Iconology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, John W. (1985). “The Centered Society and the Sacrifice of Human Freedom”, et cetera 42, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1924). Joyful Wisdom, New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1982). The Open Universe, Totowa, New Jersey, Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Thom, René (1975). Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Reading, MA: Benjamin.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology, Berkeley, SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1982). The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature, Berkeley, SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version, Menlo Park, Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar