Article contents
Some Attitudes Toward Death
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Extract
The massive literature of modern psychology, which embraces so many important and unimportant subjects, fails conspicuously to deal with one fundamental human problem—many would term it the fundamental human problem—death. Why, when there are libraries of books on every aspect of normal or abnormal character in infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and (more recently) old age, is the human adjustment to death ignored? An essay by Freud, several articles by Schilder, a volume by Anthony, and a few other scattered papers virtually exhaust the scientific literature on the subject. Does the vain Faustian spirit, searching ever for the light, fear to examine the heart of darkness? Or has society, uncloaking sexuality, put death in its place as a secret rite not to be discussed in public? Has psychology, like so much of physics, become a kind of dignified engineering, forsaking truth for utility and therefore disinterested in a matter about which nothing can be done? Or is it felt that inquiry can disclose no more than what has always been known—that all men are mortal?
- Type
- Notes and Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1957 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)
References
1. All quotations from Montaigne are from the Trechmann translation.
2. Sylvia Anthony, The Child's Discovery of Death (New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1940).
3. Sigmund Freud, "Our Attitude towards Death," Collected Papers, IV (London: Hogarth Press, 1925), 304-17.
4. Paul Schilder, Goals and Desires of Man (New York: Columbia University Press, 1942), pp. 61-110.
- 2
- Cited by