Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:12:10.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theism and Atheism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Crimes committed in the name of God are a recurrent theme in the history of Christian Europe. The ancients practiced torture and murder in war, on slaves (who were supplied by the wars) and as a form of entertainment: the circenses. But in spiritual matters the emperors were relatively tolerant. If the Christians were singled out as scapegoats, it was because they did not yet at that time place the state above all else and still recognized something higher than the empire. But since Constantine in his unscrupulous way singled out Christianity from among the existing religions to fill in the cracks in his crumbling empire and elevated it to the state religion, Europe has stood under the sign of that doctrine and betrayed it again and again. If the words of the founder, his recorded will, his precepts had been put in practice instead of being interpreted by the scholars, neither the unified Christians of the middle ages nor the disunited Christians of the modern period would have had their splendid careers. Whatever teachings could have been taken over from the Old Testament, glory in battle was no part of it. Under the heathen emperors, the commandment to render unto caesar what was caesar's could bring Christians into conflict with the state and, when they rightly refused to observe it, to the cross. But the Christian emperors would have untertaken no wars of conquest, they would have named no tribunals to punish those who had offended against them. The victorious course of Christianity since Nicaea and especially since Augustine, which was not unlike the expansion of Buddhism since the reign of Asoka, sealed its pact with that worldy wisdom which it had originally professed to renounce. Its readiness for fanaticism, without which its ascendancy would have been unthinkable, testified to a secret and indomitable hatred for that attitude of mind for which its founder had earlier been put to death.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

1 Martin Luther, Die Hauptschriften, ed. by H. V. Campenhausen, Berlin, n. d., p. 409.

2 Paul H. D. d'Holbach, Système de la nature, vol. 3, the Second Year of the Republic, p. 167.

3 Ibid., vol. 5, p. 211.

4 Cf. Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 23 ff. and pp. 183 ff.

5 Cf. Pope John XXIII, Pacem in terris, Encyclical of April 11, 1963.

6 Cf. John A. T. Robinson, Honest to God, London 1963, p. 67.

7 Cf. Ibid., p. 76.

8 Cf. Ibid., p. 114.