Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:35:03.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Truth and Metaphor: Interpretation as Philosophical and Literary Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Brayton Polka
Brayton Polka*
Affiliation:
Toronto

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When Auerbach writes in Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature that, although Homer can be analyzed, he cannot be interpreted, he puts the reader on notice that not all verbal discourse embodies the structure of interpretation. He equally shows the reader that there is discourse which, in order to be read, must be interpreted—that of the Bible and its heirs. Although Mimesis has long been celebrated, its readers have not properly remarked that what allows Auerbach to achieve his penetrating reading of Western literature is precisely the critical distinction which he makes between analysis and interpretation, between that which is devoid of or lacks (is ignorant of) interpretation and that which consciously involves (wills) interpretation. Given the failure to appreciate the distinction which Auerbach systematically draws between analysis and interpretation, it is hardly surprising that philosophers and literary critics have failed to see that the distinction between analysis and interpretation presupposes a general theory of interpretation which applies no less to philosophy than to literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 36 , Issue 143 , September 1988 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

Aristotle, The Complete Works (the revised Oxford tr.), 2 vols., ed. Barnes, J. (Princeton, 1984).Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, tr. W.R. Trask (Princeton paper).Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint, Confessions, tr. R.S. Pine-Coffin (Penguin paper).Google Scholar
Barfield, Owen, Saving the Appearances: A Study in Idolatry (Harbinger paper).Google Scholar
BIBLE, (Revised Standard Version).Google Scholar
Buber, Martin, I and Thou, tr. R.G. Smith (Scribners paper); The Complete Greek Tragedies, 4 vols., ed. Grene, D. & Lattimore, R. (Chicago, 1964).Google Scholar
Descartes, Rene, Discourse on Method, tr. D.A. Cress (Hackett paper).Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, vol. III: The Consummate Religion, ed. Hodgson, P.C. (Berkeley, 1985).Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., Logic, tr. W. Wallace (Oxford paper).Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., Phenomenology of Spirit, tr. A.V. Miller (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. N.K. Smith (St. Martin's paper).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. J.W. Ellington (Hackett paper).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, The Concept of Irony with Constant Reference to Socrates, tr. L.M. Capel (Indiana paper).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Concluding Unscientific Postscript, tr. D.F. Swenson & W. Lowrie (Princeton paper).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Fear and Trembling, tr. H.V. & E.H. Hong (Princeton paper).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Works of Love: Some Christian Reflections in the Form of Discourses, tr. H. & E. Hong (Harper Torchbook).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Joyful Wisdom, tr. T. Common (Ungar paper).Google Scholar
Plato, , Apology, in Five Dialogues, tr. G.M.A. Grube (Hackett paper).Google Scholar
Plato, , Gorgias, tr. D.J. Zeyl (Hackett paper).Google Scholar
Plato, , Republic, tr. G.M.A. Grube (Hackett paper).Google Scholar
Plato, , Symposium, tr. B. Jowett (Library of Liberal Arts paper).Google Scholar
Plato, , Theaetetus, tr. F. Cornford (Library of Liberal Arts paper).Google Scholar
Polka, Brayton, The Presocratic Philosophers, rev. ed. tr. G.S. Kirk, et al (Cambridge paper).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Finitudine e colpa, tr. M. Girardet (Bologna, 1970); Finitude et culpabilité I, in Philosophie de la volonté, T. II, Paris, Subier - Montaigne, 1960.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William, Hamlet, ed. Farnham, W. (Pelican paper).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict, Ethics, in Collected Works, vol. I, tr. E. Curley (Princeton, 1985).Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict, Theologico-Political Tractatus, in The Chief Works, vol. I, tr. R.H.M. Elwes (Dover paper) [forthcoming in vol. II of Collected Works, op. cit.].Google Scholar
Stevens, Wallace, The Palm at the End of the Mind: Selected Poems and a Play, ed. Stevens, H. (Vintage paper).Google Scholar