No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluation Of the Readiness of Family Physicians In the Prevention of Cyberchondria
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2025
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this research is to determine the readiness of family physicians to prevent cyberchondria.
Methods
The Family Physicians’ Cyberchondria Levels Assessment Questionnaire was applied to 124 family physicians to determine readiness.
Results
Family physicians mention that there can be accurate data on diagnosis and treatments on the internet (62%), but patients’ anxiety increases (88%); reach physicians and find answers on the websites of family physicians. Individuals with low health literacy research on the internet are concerned about family physicians (84.6%). Family physicians declare patients have medication with Internet information (84%), diagnose themselves with research on the internet (85.2%), and have high anxiety levels (83.2%). The family physicians use WhatsApp (90.3%) to answer patients’ questions and increase cyberchondria awareness. The family physicians have knowledge about cyberchondria, accept cyberchondria as a health problem, and have computer literacy.
Conclusions
The Internet provides individuals with a low-cost and easily accessible source of health information. The patients researching the internet have high anxiety and low health literacy. To prevent cyberchondria, direct communication with family physicians, development of health literacy, and facilitating access to communication and counseling services on the internet by central health authorities are essential.
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.
References
Frenk, J, Chen, LC, Chandran, L, et al. Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the Covıd-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2022;400(10362):1539–1556. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02092-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aslantaş, AHB, Altuntaş, M. Cyberchondria’s possible relationship with problematic internet use and ehealth literacy. J Acad Res Med. 2023;13(2):63–69. doi:10.4274/Jarem.Galenos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starcevic, V, Berle, D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related internet use. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13(2):205–213. doi: 10.1586/Ern.12.162. Pmıd: 23368807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elciyar, K, Taşçı, D. Siberkondri Ciddiyet Ölçeği’nin Anadolu Üniversitesi İletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi Öğrencilerine Uygulanması. Abant Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2017;2(4):57–70.Google Scholar
Schenkel, SK, Jungmann, SM, Gropalis, M, et al. Conceptualizations of cyberchondria and relations to the anxiety spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):E27835. doi:10.2196/27835selfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, F, Malik, NI, Atta, M, et al. Relationship between health-anxiety and cyberchondria: role of metacognitive beliefs. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2590. doi:10.3390/Jcm11092590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasiri, M, Mohammadkhani, S, Akbari, M, et al. The structural model of cyberchondria based on personality traits, health-related metacognition, cognitive bias, and emotion dysregulation. Front. Psychiatry. 2023;13:960055. doi: 10.3389/Fpsyt.2022.960055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambrosini, F, Truzoli, R, Vismara, M, et al. The effect of cyberchondria on anxiety, depression and quality of life during Covıd-19: the mediational role of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and internet addiction. Heliyon. 2022;8(5):E09437. doi:10.1016/J.Heliyon.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neeraj, MS, Nirmala, BP, Sharma, MK. Association between health anxiety, smartphone addiction, and cyberchondria. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2024;40(2):126–131. doi: 10.4103/İjsp.İjsp_111_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungmann, SM, Gropalis, M, Schenkel, SK, et al. Is cyberchondria specific to hypochondriasis? J Anxiety Disord. 2023;102:102798. doi: 10.1016/J.Janxdis.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, JH, Hameed, S. Illness Anxiety Disorder. Statpearls. Treasure Island (Fl): Statpearls Publishing. Published July 16, 2023. https://Www.Ncbi.Nlm.Nih.Gov/Books/Nbk554399/. Accessed August 25, 2023Google Scholar
Szawłoga, T, Soroka, K, Śliwińska, M. Cyberchondria in students: an ehealth related problem. A review. Med Sci Pulse. 2024;18(2):12–21. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.5653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, CR, Meijman, FJ. The public and the internet: multifaceted drives for seeking health information. Health Inform J. 2010;16(2):145–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durak, B, Erdoğan Kaya, A. Correlating cyberchondria and health anxiety: demographic insights from stable asthma patients. Eur J Ther. 2024;30(4):502–509. doi:10.58600/eurjther2026Google Scholar
Mclean, J. Benefits of good-quality online health information and risks of “Dr Google.” Nursing Times. 2023;119:10.Google Scholar
Bouwman, M, Teunissen, Q, Wijburg, F, et al. Physician Google ending the diagnostic odyssey in lysosomal storage disorders: parents using internet search engines as an efficient diagnostic strategy in rare diseases. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:642–644. doi:10.1136/Adc.2009.171827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauer, F, Litzkendorf, S, Göbel, J, et al. Rare diseases on the internet: an assessment of the quality of online information. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):E23. doi:10.2196/Jmir.7056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnood, A, Johnston, B, Mair, FS. A mixed methods systematic review of the effects of patient online self-diagnosing in the “Smart-Phone Society” on the healthcare professional-patient relationship and medical authority. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;20(1):253. doi:10.1186/S12911-020-01243-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J, Wang, Y. Social media use for health purposes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):E17917.doi:10.2196/17917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu Khait, A, Mrayyan, M, Al-Rjoub, S, et al. Cyberchondria, anxiety sensitivity, hypochondria, and internet addiction: implications for mental health professionals. Curr Psychol. 2023;42:27141–27152. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03815-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Xu, P, Sun, Q, et al. Factors influencing the e-health literacy in cancer patients: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2023;17(2):425–440. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01260-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, A, Wilson, S. Internet healthcare: do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7:227–229. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.7.3.2273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akaydın, H, Baltacı, A. An overvıew of famıly medicine servıces in the world and in Türkiye. .Aurum J Health Sciences 2023;5(2):77–102.Google Scholar
Bayraktar, M, Mutlu, M. Insufficient knowledge about primary health care services: is it the reason for not applying to family medicine? Cerrahpaşa Med J. 2022;46(2):91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazcano-Ponce, E, Angeles-Llerenas, A, Rodríguez-Valentín, R, et al. Communication patterns in the physician-patient relationship: evaluating determinants associated with low paternalism in Mexico. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):125. doi:10.1186/S12910-020-00566-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starcevic, V, Berle, D, Arnáez, S. Recent insights into cyberchondria. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020;22(11):56. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01179-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElroy, E, Kearney, M, et al. The CSS-12: the CSS-12: development and validation of a short-form version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(5):330–335. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed