Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:08:59.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Involvement of the US Department of Defense in Civilian Assistance, Part I: A Quantitative Description of the Projects Funded by the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Margaret Ellis Bourdeaux ,
Lynn Lawry ,
Eugene V. Bonventre  and
Frederick M. Burkle Jr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To review the history and goals of the US Department of Defense's largest civilian assistance program, the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid Program and to describe the number, geographic regions, years, key words, countries, and types of projects carried out under this program since 2001.

Methods: Using the program's central database, we reviewed all approved projects since 2001 and tabulated them by year, combatant command, country, and key word. We also reviewed the project descriptions of projects funded between January 1, 2006, and February 9, 2008, and examined how their activities varied by combatant command and year.

Results: Of the 5395 projects in the database, 2097 were funded. Projects took place in more than 90 countries, with Southern, Pacific, and Africa Command hosting the greatest number. The most common types of projects were school, health, disaster response, and water infrastructure construction, and disaster-response training. The “global war on terror” was the key word most frequently tagged to project descriptions. Project descriptions lacked stated goals as well as implementation and coordination strategies with potential partners, and did not report outcome or impact indicators.

Conclusion: The geographic reach of the program is vast and projects take place in a wide variety of public sectors. Yet their security and civilian assistance value remains unclear given the lack of stated project goals, implementation strategies, or measures of effectiveness. To facilitate transparency and policy discussion, we recommend project proposals include hypotheses as to how they will enhance US security, their relevance to the public sector they address, and outcome and impact indicators that can assess their value and effectiveness.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2010;4:66-73)

Keywords

humanitarian assistancedisaster responsemilitary aid programscivic aidmonitoring and evaluationcivil-military
Type
Original Articles
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 66 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Olson, L, Gregorian, H. Civil-military coordination: challenges and opportunities in Afghanistan and beyond. J Milit Strategic Stud. 2007;10 (1):1–12http://www.jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/article/view/34/32. Accessed January 18, 2010.Google Scholar
2.Evans, G, Sahnoun, Mand the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The responsibility to protect. http://www.iciss.ca/pdf/Commission-Report.pdf. Published December 2001. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
3.White, J. Gates sees terrorism remaining enemy number one. Washington Post. July 31, 2008:A01.Google Scholar
4.Department of Defense. DoD Directive 3000.05: Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations. November 28, 2005. http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300005p.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2010.Google Scholar
5.Ploch, L. Africa Command: U.S. strategic interests and the role of the U.S. Military in Africa. http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL34003_05162007.pdf. Published May 16, 2007. Accessed February 9, 2009.Google Scholar
6.US Army; for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint tactics, techniques, and procedures for foreign disaster assistance. Joint Publication 3-07.6. http://reliefweb.int/rw/lib.nsf/db900sid/OCHA-772KWT/$file/us%20gov-joint%20tactics%20for%20humanitarian%20assistance-2001.pdf?openelement. Published August 15, 2001. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
7.Withers, G, Isacson, A, Haugaard, L, Olson, J, Fyke, JReady, aim, foreign policy: how the Pentagon's role in foreign policy is growing, and why Congress—and the American public—should be worried.http://www.wola.org/media/LAWG-Combo-ForeignPolicy-5.pdf. Published March 2008. Accessed January 29, 2009.Google Scholar
8.Patrick, S, Brown, KThe Pentagon and global development: making sense of the DoD's expanding role: working paper 131.http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/14815/. Published November 12, 2007. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
9.Drifmeyer, JL, Llewellyn, CCOverview of overseas humanitarian disaster and civic aid programs.Mil Med. 2003;168 (12):975–980.Google Scholar
10.Armed Forces. 10 USC §404. (2007).http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/10/subtitles/a/parts/i/chapters/20/sections/section%5F404.html. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
11.Webb, N, Richter, AStrategy at the crossroads: The case of the navy hospital ships.at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14752/. Published April 2009. Accessed January 18, 2010.Google Scholar
12.Smith, TOverseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid Appropriation (OHDACA).Defense Security Cooperation Agency Web site.http://www.dsca.mil/programs/ha/new/OHDACA_ONE-PAGER_b.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
13.Perry, CM, Travayiakas, MThe US foreign disaster response process: how it works and how it could work better.http://www.ifpa.org/pdf/DisasterRelief.pdf. Published May 2008. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
14.Hanrahan, CECRS report for Congress: Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami: food aid needs and the U.S. response.http://ncseonline.org/nle/crs/abstract.cfm?NLEid=325. Published April 8, 2005. Updated June 2, 2005.Google Scholar
15.Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance. USAID budget.http://www.usaid.gov/policy/budget/cbj2006/cent_progs/central_dcha_ofda.html. Accessed January 29, 2009.Google Scholar
16.US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Topographic Engineering Center. Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS) User Guide.https://www.ohasis.org/OHASIS/help/OHASIS_User_Manual_5_10_07.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2009.Google Scholar
17.Leaning, JThe dilemma of neutrality.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22 (5):418–421.Google Scholar
18.Bristol, NMilitary incursions into aid work anger humanitarian groups.Lancet. 2006;367 (9508):384–386.Google Scholar
19.Anderson, MB.Do No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace—or War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Reaves, EJ, Schor, KW, Burkle, FMJImplementation of evidence-based humanitarian programs in military-led missions, part I: qualitative gap analysis of current military and international aid programs.Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2 (4):230–236.Google Scholar
21.Burns, RPentagon chief: military must accept criticism.USA Today. June 10, 2008.http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-06-10-806511852_x.htm. Accessed February 22, 2009.Google Scholar
22. Congressional budget justification: foreign operations: fiscal year 2008.USAID Web site.http://www.usaid.gov/policy/budget/cbj2008/fy2008cbj_full.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2009.Google Scholar
23.Bonventre, EVMonitoring and evaluation of Department of Defense humanitarian assistance programs.Milit Rev. 2008;88 (1):66–72.Google Scholar