Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:44:23.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Social Network Analysis to Major Petrochemical Accident: Interorganizational Collaboration Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Marzieh Abbassinia
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Omid Kalatpour
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Majid Motamedzade
Affiliation:
Ergonomics Department, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Alireza Soltanian
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Iraj Mohammadfam*
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Iraj Mohammadfam, Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran (e-mail: mohammadfam@umsha.ac.ir).

Abstract

Objective:

Crisis management in major accidents requires the collaboration among different organizations. One of the most important problems of crisis management is the lack of coordination between executive organizations. The aim of this study was to examine the structural characters and problems of interorganizational network during crisis in the petrochemical industry and provide solutions to achieve the highest performance in crisis management.

Methods:

The organizations involved in crisis management were identified through interviews and questionnaires. Gephi (0.9.1) software was used to examine interorganizational relationships.

Results:

In this study, the crisis management team consisted of 25 public and private organizations and non-governmental organizations. The highest betweenness centrality was observed in Crisis Management of Provincial Government (CMPG) (142.16) and Fire Department of Petrochemical Complex (FDC) (89.3). The highest closeness centrality was observed in FDC (0.77), CMPG (0.7), Shazand Governorate (0.7), and Crisis Management of University of Medical Sciences (0.7).

Conclusions:

Coordination between organizations plays an important role in crisis and emergency management, and social network analysis helps identify strengths and weaknesses of organizations involved in crisis management, overcome those weaknesses, and consequently achieve the best performance in crisis management.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Tang, P, Chen, H, Shao, S. Examining the intergovernmental and interorganizational network of responding to major accidents for improving the emergency management system in China. Complexity. 2018;2018:1-16.Google Scholar
Mohammadfam, I, Bastani, S, Esaghi, M, et al. Evaluation of coordination of emergency response team through the social network analysis. Case study: oil and gas refinery. Saf Health Work. 2015;6(1):30-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C-W, Yao, H-Q, Wu, T-C. Applying data mining techniques to analyze the causes of major occupational accidents in the petrochemical industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2013;26(6):1269-1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X, Zhang, Q, Xu, X. Petrochemical plant multi-objective and multi-stage fire emergency management technology system based on the fire risk prediction. Procedia Eng. 2013;62:1104-1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkowski, J. Disaster management handbook. New York, CRC Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshmiri, S, Pordel, S, Raeesi, A, et al. Environmental pollution caused by gas and petrochemical industries and its effects on the health of residents of Assaluyeh Region, Iranian energy capital: a review study. ISMJ. 2018;21(2):162-185.Google Scholar
Mohammadfam, I, Bastani, S, Golmohamadi, R, et al. Applying social network analysis to evaluate preparedness through coordination and trust in emergency management. Environ Haz. 2015;14(4):329-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcik, B, Beamon, BM, Krejci, CC, et al. Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Econ. 2010;126(1):22-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikdelo, F, Rahnavard, F. Measuring inter-organizational coordination and identifying factors affecting it in public organizations. J Manag Dev Process. 2017;30(2):3-22.Google Scholar
Aros, SK, Gibbons, DE. Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;269(2):451-465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opdyke, A, Lepropre, F, Javernick-Will, A, Koschmann, M. Inter-organizational resource coordination in post-disaster infrastructure recovery. Constr Manag Econ. 2017;35(8-9):514-530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, N, Hanig, S, Brown, DJ, Shen, W. How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: a social network analysis. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(6):648-662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbassinia, M, Kalatpour, O, Soltanian, AR, et al. Determination and score of effective criteria to prioritize emergency situations in a petrochemical industry. Occup Hyg Health Promot J. 2019;3(1):16-25.Google Scholar
Bastian, M, Heymann, S, Jacomy, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; 2009:361-362.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, D, Altamirano, F, Banks, J, et al. CSB investigation of the explosions and fire at the BP Texas City refinery on March 23, 2005. Process Saf Prog. 2006;25(4):345-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghorani-Azam, A, Riahi-Zanjani, B, Balali-Mood, M. Effects of air pollution on human health and practical measures for prevention in Iran. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:65.Google ScholarPubMed
Chai, C, Liu, X, Zhang, W, et al. Social network analysis of the vulnerabilities of interdependent critical infrastructures. Int J Crit Infrastruct. 2008;4(3):256.Google Scholar
Mohammadfam, I, Bastani, S, Es-haghi, M, et al. Assessment of working interactions of emergency team members using social network analysis. Health Saf Work. 2014;4(3):3748.Google Scholar
Behmanesh, DS, Kargar, A. Provide a theoretical model of inter-organizational coordination in strategic management of natural crises. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Interdisciplinary Studies. 2017;27(1):71-102. [In Persian]Google Scholar
Mohebifar, R, Tabibi, S, Asefzadeh, S. Designing a structure of disaster management for Iran. Journal of Health Administration. 2008;11(33):47-56.Google Scholar
Sahebi, IG, Arab, A, Moghadam, MRS. Analyzing the barriers to humanitarian supply chain management: a case study of the Tehran Red Crescent Societies. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;24:232-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiee, A, Ardalan, A, Poorhoseini, S. Assessment of coordination among lead agencies of natural disasters management in Iran. Hakim Res J. 2013;16(2):107-117.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N, Arslan, T, Collins, ML. Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: toward a network-centered approach. Adm Soc. 2010;42(2):222-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar