Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:38:19.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TAOTIE, DRAGON, PHOENIX, AND FARMER: A HIGHLY DECORATED QIN EXCAVATED FROM JIULIANDUN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Yuanzheng Yang
Yuanzheng Yang*
Affiliation:
Yang Yuanzheng 楊元錚, Department of Music, The University of Hong Kong; email: yuanzhen@hku.hk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mythical origins of the Chinese qin have been forged by ancient literature ever since the age of Confucius, nevertheless, very little is known about the morphology of the ancient qin and its embodied symbolism. This article, by analyzing a most recently discovered ancient qin found in a fourth-century b.c.e. tomb in Jiuliandun, Zaoyang city, Hubei province, in 2002, will explore the relief carving and lacquered drawings found on the instrument itself and their symbolic significance as a representation of the worldview and philosophical state of mind of the Warring States period. I will suggest that a qin contemporaneous to Confucius and played by him looks distinctly different from the version produced by the fertile imagination of the medieval Chinese; instead, it was divided into five registers, and it is this segmented subdivision which defines the ancient qin and differentiates it fundamentally from its classical counterpart. Strikingly, the symbolic depictions in which it was clad represent not only the fertile imagination of the Chu aristocracy, but also include portrayal of the more menial tasks of the ordinary Chu farmer and herdsman as he proceeds through the cycle of the agricultural year, and thus provide the modern scholar with an extraordinarily vivid insight into contemporary Chu life.

提要

琴的起源，在孔子時代流傳下來的古典文獻中就已經被神化了。目前我們對上古琴的形製及其象徵意義仍知之甚少。本文通過考察2002年湖北棗陽九連墩出土的一床戰國琴，嘗試解讀該琴無與倫比的華麗浮雕和精美漆畫中隱含的象徵意義。作者指出孔子時代人們所彈奏的琴的真實形態與中古時代人們對上古琴形製的想像大相徑庭。出土上古琴構造分爲五節，這種分段結構是上古琴與中古以來的傳世琴的最大區別。尤其值得重視的是：該琴的文樣和圖案所展現的情景並不囿於楚國貴族所特有的瑰麗想像，其中相當一部分還可以闡釋爲楚國農夫牧者一年之中種種勞作的平凡場景，從而爲現代學者揭示了戰國時代楚人日常生活的生動一瞥。

Keywords

QinWarring States periodChu kingdomrelief carvinglacquered drawing琴戰國時代楚國、浮雕漆畫
Type
Articles
Information
Early China , Volume 38 , 2015 , pp. 129 - 150

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For the complex ideology the Chinese have developed around its music, see van Gulik, Robert, The Lore of the Chinese Lute: An Essay in the Ideology of the Ch'in, 3rd ed. (Bangkok: Orchid Press, 2011)Google Scholar. In this book, he calls the qin a “lute,” rather than a “zither,” in order to convey to the general reader something of the cultural significance of the instrument and its music.

2. For a complete facsimile of Lidai qinshi tu 歷代琴式圖 (literally, the Manual of Qin Styles in the Past Dynasties), see Guoli Gugong bowuyuan bianji weiyuanhui 國立故宮博物院編輯委員會, ed., Gugong shuhua tulu 故宮書畫圖錄, vol. 22 (Taipei: National Palace Museum, 2003), 102–11Google Scholar.

3. For a complete facsimile of the Ming dynasty woodblock edition of Profound Airs Spread by the Wind printed in 1539, see Wenhuabu wenxue yishu yanjiuyuan yinyue yanjiusuo 文化部文學藝術硏究院音樂硏究所 and Beijing guqin yanjiuhui 北京古琴硏究會, eds., Qinqu jicheng 琴曲集成, vol. 2 (Beijing: Zhonghua, 1980), 1–380 Google Scholar. Facsimile of a similar woodcut of Confucius' qin can be found in Yuanzheng, Yang, ed., Guwu Wang Mengshu xiansheng qinxue yizhu 古吳汪孟舒先生琴學遺著 (Beijing: Zhonghua, 2013)Google Scholar, vol. 1, 291.

4. For musical instruments excavated from this tomb, see von Falkenhausen, Lothar, “The Zeng Hou Yi Finds in the History of Chinese Music,” Music in the Age of Confucius, ed. So, Jenny F. (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 2000), 101–13Google Scholar; Bagley, Robert, “The Prehistory of Chinese Music Theory,” Proceedings of British Academy 131 (2004), 41–90 Google Scholar; and bowuguan, Hubei sheng, Zeng hou Yi mu曾侯乙墓, vol. 1 (Beijing: Wenwu, 1989), 75–174 Google Scholar.

5. Hubei sheng Jingmen shi bowuguan, “Jingmen Guodian yihao Chu mu” 荊門郭店一號楚墓, Wenwu 1997.7, 35–48; Huang Gangzheng 黃綱正, “Changsha chutu de Zhan'guo qin” 長沙出土的戰國琴, Yueqi 樂器 1984.1, 19–20; Changsha shi wenwu gongzuodui 長沙市文物工作隊, “Changsha shi Wulipai Zhan'guo muguo mu” 長沙市五里牌戰國木椁墓, Hu'nan kaogu jikan 湖南考古輯刊 1 (1982), 32–36 Google Scholar; and Lawergren, Bo, “Strings,” Music in the Age of Confucius, ed. So, Jenny F. (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 2000), 65–86 Google Scholar.

6. See Hubei sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, “Hubei Zaoyang shi Jiuliandun Chu mu” 湖北棗陽市九連墩楚墓, Kaogu 2003.7, 10–14, and colour plates 3–6. An even more perfunctory version can be found in Liu Guosheng 劉國勝, “Hubei Zaoyang Jiuliandun Chu mu huo zhongda faxian” 湖北棗陽九連墩楚墓獲重大發現, Jianghan Kaogu 江漢考古 2003.2, 29–30.

7. Hubei sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, “Hubei Zaoyang shi Jiuliandun Chu mu,” 12.

8. For illustrations of the numerous bronze, jade, and musical instruments excavated from the two tombs, see bowuguan, Hubei sheng, ed., Jiuliandun: Changjiang zhongyou de Chu guo guizu damu 九連墩: 長江中游的楚國貴族大墓 (Beijing: Wenwu, 2007)Google Scholar; and bowuguan, Shenzhen, ed., Jian wu Chu tian: Hubei chutu Chu wenwu zhan 劍舞楚天: 湖北出土楚文物展圖錄 (Beijing: Wenwu, 2010)Google Scholar.

9. Hubei sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, “Hubei Zaoyang shi Jiuliandun Chu mu,” 11–12.

10. Wang Hongxing 王紅星 suggests the age of the male occupant was between 50 and 60, that of the female occupant between 45 and 55, but Hu Yali 胡雅麗 suggests that the age of the male occupant was between 35 and 40, that of the female occupant between 26 and 30. See: Hongxing, Wang, “Jiuliandun yierhao Chu mu de niandai yu muzhu shenfen” 九連墩一二號楚墓的年代與墓主身份, in Chu wenhua yanjiu lunji 楚文化研究論集, vol. 6, ed. yanjiuhui, Chu wenhua 楚文化研究會 (Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu, 2005), 433–37Google Scholar; Hu Yali, “Jiuliandun yierhao mu zongshu” 九連墩一二號墓綜述, in Jiuliandun: Changjiang zhongyou de Chu guo guizu damu, 21 and 23; and Hu Yali, “Jiuliandun Chu mu fajue yu chubu yanjiu” 九連墩一二號楚墓發掘與初步研究, in Jianwu Chu tian: Hubei chutu Chu wenwu zhan, 19.

11. Hu, “Jiuliandun yierhao mu zongshu,” 21.

12. The qin's museum accession number is M1: 851; its temporary excavation number is M1: 363 (this number is written in yellow on the back of the instrument's front plate), whilst next to this number, I found another number M2: 363 in white. This confusing state of affairs might explain why some commentators have erroneously described two different qin as having provenance in this tomb complex. See Hubei sheng wenwu kaogu yanjiusuo, “Hubei Zaoyang shi Jiuliandun Chu mu,” 12; and Ding Chengyun 丁承運, “Handai qinzhi gegudingxin kao” 漢代琴製革故鼎新考, Zijincheng 紫禁城 2013.10, 48. The archeological designator of the qin is M1: W363. See Hubei sheng bowuguan, ed., Jiuliandun: Changjiang zhongyou de Chu guo guizu damu, 89.

13. The average diameter of the string holes is 0.3 cm, and the distance between two adjacent string holes is 1.9 cm. The sound-hole on the back of the top plate is 29.4 cm in length, and 2.0 cm in width.

14. Some scholars argue that zoomorphic taotie face designs can be traced back to jade pieces found in the much earlier Neolithic sites of the so-called Liangzhu culture (3310–2250 b.c.e.).

15. Rawson, Jessica, “Late Shang Bronze Design: Meaning and Purpose,” The Problem of Meaning in Early Chinese Ritual Bronzes, ed. Whitfield, Roderick (London: Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1993)Google Scholar, 75. For discussions regarding the presence or absence of the symbolic meaning of the taotie motif, see also Bagley, Robert, Shang Ritual Bronzes in the Arthur M. Sackler Collection (Washington D.C.: Arthur M. Sackler Foundation, 1987), 30–36 Google Scholar; Sarah Allan, “Art and Meaning,” The Problem of Meaning in Early Chinese Ritual Bronzes, ed. Whitfield, 9–33; Robert Bagley, “Meaning and Explanation,” The Problem of Meaning in Early Chinese Ritual Bronzes, 34–55; Chang, K. C., Art, Myth, and Ritual, The Path to Political Authority in Ancient China (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; and Paper, Jordan, “The Meaning of the T'ao-t'ieh ,” History of Religions 18 (1978), 18–41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. The Lore of the Chinese Lute, 102–3.

17. The Lore of the Chinese Lute, 200–209, plates 23–26; and Shōsōin Jimusho 正倉院事務所, ed., Shōsōin no gakki 正倉院の楽器 (Tōkyō: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, 1967), 17–18 Google Scholar, 74, plates 2, 3, 27–33.

18. He'nan sheng wenwu yanjiusuo, Xinyang Chu mu 信陽楚墓 (Beijing: Wenwu, 1986), 29–31 Google Scholar, colour plates II, III, and plates XIV–XVII; Zhongguo yinyue wenwu daxi zong bianjibu 中國音樂文物大系總編輯部, ed., Zhongguo yinyue wenwu daxi: He'nan juan 中國音樂文物大系: 河南卷, 132–34; and Music in the Age of Confucius, 26–27, and Figure 1.10.

19. For shamanism in Chu, see Sukhu, Gopal, “Monkeys, Shamans, Emperors, and Poets: The Chuci and Images of Chu during the Han Dynasty,” Defining Chu: Image and Reality in Ancient China, ed. Cook, Constance A. and Major, John S. (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1999), 145–66Google Scholar; and John S. Major, “Characteristics of Late Chu Religion,” Defining Chu: Image and Reality in Ancient China, 121–44.

20. Chu (c. 1030–223 b.c.e.) was an ancient Chinese state in the Yangtze valley during the Zhou Dynasty (c. 1046–256 b.c.e.). See Barry B. Blakeley, “The Geography of Chu,” Cook and Major, Defining Chu, 9–20.

21. Music in the Age of Confucius, 134.

22. Yuanzheng, Yang, “Inventing the Fuxi Style of Qin ,” Studien zur Musikarchäologie VIII, Orient-Archäologie 27, ed. Eichmann, Ricardo, et al. (Rahden/Westf.: Leidorf, 2012), 195–98Google Scholar.